Trains.com

bio-diesel

6508 views
17 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • 707 posts
Posted by tdmidget on Wednesday, March 9, 2016 9:18 PM

Tugboat Tony

So you've answered the question. IT IS NOT A VIABLE FUEL. You tell us that you have all this experience with it and then list a boatload of serious problems that come with it. It is a dumb idea to take a product, waste or otherwise that has a viable market and pretend it is a viable fuel just because you can jump through enough hoops to make it sort of work.

 

 
tdmidget

Biodiesel is a fantasy. The highest percentage of so called "bio diesel  allowed is 25 %. "Biodiesel" at the pump is as little as 2%. It is a "Feel good" thing. Just like corn ethanol, it is an energy loser. It takes more energy to produce than it contains. In case you hadn't noticed , there is/was a market for used vegetable and animal fats before the "biodiesel " fad and the result will be higher prices for the items which consumed them, such as soaps and cosmetics.

These fantasies are like perpetual motion machines that keep popping up in the minds of fanatics.

 

 

 

 

Thats funny I have been using B99 bio diesel for underground mining applications for a long time.  Bio has a very similar power rating and burns much much cleaner.  the drawbacks are that it can be very corrosive depending on the oil source, and the glycerin can plug up fuel injector nozzles. 

 

  • Member since
    February 2016
  • 176 posts
Posted by Tugboat Tony on Monday, March 7, 2016 12:25 AM

tdmidget

Biodiesel is a fantasy. The highest percentage of so called "bio diesel  allowed is 25 %. "Biodiesel" at the pump is as little as 2%. It is a "Feel good" thing. Just like corn ethanol, it is an energy loser. It takes more energy to produce than it contains. In case you hadn't noticed , there is/was a market for used vegetable and animal fats before the "biodiesel " fad and the result will be higher prices for the items which consumed them, such as soaps and cosmetics.

These fantasies are like perpetual motion machines that keep popping up in the minds of fanatics.

 

 

Thats funny I have been using B99 bio diesel for underground mining applications for a long time.  Bio has a very similar power rating and burns much much cleaner.  the drawbacks are that it can be very corrosive depending on the oil source, and the glycerin can plug up fuel injector nozzles. 

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,644 posts
Posted by Wizlish on Saturday, October 10, 2015 5:37 PM

Deggesty
Back in June, as I was on my way to Seattle from Chicago, I saw many tank cars that were marked as containing inedible animal fat (or something like that). I had never seen such before, and wondered just what it was and where it was going. Could they have been headed for a plant which produces biodiesel?

Most of that stuff will be used for animal feed (disturbing as that might be), withother principal uses for soaps and greases.  Only a very little is presently used for biodiesel; Here is a PDF that tells you some of what is needed.

Most biodiesel is made from vegetable feedstock that has the 'right' composition for diesel fuel -- rapeseed oil (AKA one of the base oils for 'canola') being a principal one.  There used to be a considerable market for 'waste vegetable oil' conversions for diesel vehicles -- the 'drive free with the smell of french fries wherever you go, and save the environment' -- but several things have conspired to marginalize this, ranging from the need to remove the abrasive particles found from restaurant fry-grill cleaning to the unsuitability of even small amounts of wax or other material to pass modern high-pressure small-volume fuel injectors.  Needless to say, there is now a market for that waste oil, and when it is not free the hoops you have to jump through to use it are not as attractive...

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Saturday, October 10, 2015 11:12 AM

Back in June, as I was on my way to Seattle from Chicago, I saw many tank cars that were marked as containing inedible animal fat (or something like that). I had never seen such before, and wondered just what it was and where it was going. Could they have been headed for a plant which produces biodiesel?

Johnny

  • Member since
    October 2012
  • 177 posts
Posted by nfotis on Monday, October 5, 2015 8:34 AM

Here in EU we have about 7% biodiesel in our fuel stations (military grade diesel is exempted).

This seems to cause problems with filters plugged up with a kind of fungi and residues (the fungi seems to thrive on fuel tanks which have humidity inside).

A sample link (in Greek) by a train enginner, includes some photos from fuel filters in a DMU, and shows the gunk plugging the filters (plus some links):

http://mixanikosose.blogspot.gr/2015/09/blog-post_14.html

 

N.F.

  • Member since
    April 2015
  • 54 posts
Posted by groomer man on Wednesday, August 19, 2015 6:49 PM
Non road diesel is still dyed red and I have heard the DOT will check tanks at inspections. As to running cleaner lot of sulphated ash in diesel
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • 707 posts
Posted by tdmidget on Wednesday, August 19, 2015 6:59 AM

Biodiesel is a fantasy. The highest percentage of so called "bio diesel  allowed is 25 %. "Biodiesel" at the pump is as little as 2%. It is a "Feel good" thing. Just like corn ethanol, it is an energy loser. It takes more energy to produce than it contains. In case you hadn't noticed , there is/was a market for used vegetable and animal fats before the "biodiesel " fad and the result will be higher prices for the items which consumed them, such as soaps and cosmetics.

These fantasies are like perpetual motion machines that keep popping up in the minds of fanatics.

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 2,505 posts
Posted by caldreamer on Tuesday, August 18, 2015 9:01 PM

Is there any required tuning or tweaking of the engine settings to burn bio-diesel as compared to regular diesel?

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Tuesday, August 18, 2015 7:01 PM

Railroads do not need to pay road tax on their fuel in most states, so they are likely exempt from any requirement. Non-road diesel was once dyed red to help catch scofflaws, but I don't think this process persists.

  • Member since
    July 2011
  • 29 posts
Posted by f45gnbn on Tuesday, August 18, 2015 5:56 PM

In Minnesota all Diesel sold at the pumps is mandated to have a minimum of like 2% biodiesel, so Locomotives fueled here may run a little bit unless they are exempt from buying the mixture since they don't go down to the gas station to fuel up.

  • Member since
    March 2013
  • 711 posts
Posted by SD70M-2Dude on Tuesday, August 11, 2015 1:08 PM

NS was using 100% biodiesel in locomotives out of their Meridian, Mississippi terminal and it apparently worked quite well.  The fuel they were using was made from waste animal fat and grease (think rendered slaughterhouse byproducts).  The experiment only ended when the biodiesel plant shut down, for lack of feedstock IIRC.  But from what I heard NS was saving quite a bit of money, both on fuel costs and engine maintenance because the biodiesel burned cleaner.

Greetings from Alberta

-an Articulate Malcontent

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Monday, August 10, 2015 10:32 PM

I think just steam, but their steam locomotives burned diesel before, so it is possible.

There have been on-and-off tests for years, with the Trains article being about a more recent NS test. When properly refined and mixed with a usual amount of regular diesel (sort of like ethanol in gasoline) there are no problems, but the challenge is making large enough quantities of it to make it worthwhile.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Monday, August 10, 2015 10:01 PM

Didn't the GCRR go to all 'green' fuel, or was that just for their steam power.

IIRC, Herr Diesel originally designed his engine to run on peanut oil...

Chuck

  • Member since
    April 2015
  • 54 posts
Posted by groomer man on Sunday, August 9, 2015 2:50 AM
Wasn't there an article in Trains not long ago on CSX running some on a mixture. We run our Hercules on our sawmill on it and it runs fine. Less oil contamination also except you have a hankering for French fries when your sawing
  • Member since
    November 2014
  • 137 posts
Posted by JoeBlow on Sunday, November 30, 2014 12:42 PM

The San Francisco Bay Railroad uses biodiesel to fuel their locomotives. They are a class 3 railroad. Check it out: www.sfbayrail.com

  • Member since
    April 2011
  • 649 posts
Posted by LensCapOn on Wednesday, November 26, 2014 11:09 AM

An idea. Let's eat the food and put the useless stuff that comes from the ground in our engines.

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: SE Minnesota
  • 6,847 posts
Posted by jrbernier on Wednesday, November 26, 2014 10:22 AM

  There have been experiments through the years to prove that it will work.    The big issue is cost, get millions of gallons to power a freight railroad may not be feasable at this point.    And with normal diesel fuel available, will it be cost competative?

Jim

Modeling BNSF  and Milwaukee Road in SW Wisconsin

  • Member since
    May 2007
  • 194 posts
bio-diesel
Posted by nyc#25 on Wednesday, November 26, 2014 7:09 AM

  Does anyone know if any railroads have tried or  are using

bio-diesel?   Would there be any negagtives such as excessive

engine wear?

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy