Trains.com

UP SD9043 Locomotives in Roseville.

8738 views
21 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2007
  • From: Rocklin, California
  • 12 posts
UP SD9043 Locomotives in Roseville.
Posted by georgeh on Tuesday, November 5, 2013 11:43 AM

I have noticed quite a few UP SD9043 locomotives parked on the sand track in Roseville, CA. yard. Are these going to be sold, scapped or traded in? They have been there for some time now.

George Halstead ghalstead@surewest.net
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NW Wisconsin
  • 3,857 posts
Posted by beaulieu on Tuesday, November 5, 2013 12:02 PM

The whole fleet of 300+ locomotives is currently stored at various locations. They are suffering frame cracking at the point where the fuel tank attaches to the frame. Two units have had a modification done to hopefully solve the problem. If the modifications prove successful then the rest of the fleet will be modified and they will be returned to service.

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • From: Libertyville, IL
  • 372 posts
Posted by Mr. Railman on Tuesday, November 5, 2013 9:31 PM

Some of their fleet was being sold on Ozark Mountain Railcar. It looks like they sold, though...
 

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: SE Minnesota
  • 6,845 posts
Posted by jrbernier on Thursday, November 7, 2013 1:00 PM

Mr. Railman

Some of their fleet was being sold on Ozark Mountain Railcar. It looks like they sold, though...
 

Mr. Railman,

 What is for sale on the Ozark Mtn site appears to be a SD90MAC engine.  The thread is about SD9043MAC engines.  The SD90MAC engines have the 4 stroke 265 power plant that is not upgrade-able to meet the EPA emissions standards(at lest no one has offered a kit).  Many of these were EMD owned and have very early electrical systems.  The EMD owned units were deemed not worth upgrading the electricals or re- powering with a 710 series power plant.  UP owned ones are too small of a fleet and are being sold off.  SD9043MAC engines have a basic 2 stroke 710 power plant and are being kept as long as they do not have a major mechanical issue. The current frame 'sag' issue is being addressed as previously noted.  If that 'fix' does not work out, then maybe they will sold off.  Remember, these locomotives are already 15-20 years old!

Jim

Modeling BNSF  and Milwaukee Road in SW Wisconsin

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,813 posts
Posted by YoHo1975 on Thursday, November 14, 2013 9:56 PM

Yes, a month, month and a half ago, the stored 9043s were all moved from the smog track where they had been collected to the Sand track and all the Dash 9s and dash 8s were moved off to Smog. Then some of the dash 8/9s left I think sold or lease returns, but more got put back on the Sand Track. The other day I saw a Dash 8 waiting to go into the shops and a 3 window 60M that had been on the sand track for a long long time being run around the service area.

They are definitely waiting for a fix on the 9043s though.

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,826 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Sunday, November 17, 2013 4:51 PM

There's a bunch stored at Missouri Valley, IA, and I think maybe at Marshalltown, IA too.  I haven't been that way since last winter, so don't know but that's what I've been told.  Local management has said those engines won't be coming back into service.  They are going to be disposed of.  No one was sorry to hear that when the news was disclosed at our last union meeting.

So now that they said they are getting rid of them, like other times, they'll probably change their minds and put them back into service.

Jeff

 

  • Member since
    October 2013
  • 212 posts
Posted by McKey on Wednesday, November 27, 2013 8:52 AM

Do I get it right is I say this is an SD90MAC unit? Where the SD9043MAC would have a rounded section atop the engine, if the roundness has here any significance.

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,813 posts
Posted by YoHo1975 on Wednesday, November 27, 2013 6:04 PM

No the rounded back units are the 90MACs. That is a 9043.

Also, I think, though someone else here probably knows for sure that all of the "classic" EMD M cabbed 90MACs are long gone and the remaining ones all have cabs like the SD70ACes

  • Member since
    October 2013
  • 212 posts
Posted by McKey on Friday, November 29, 2013 3:05 AM

Thanks for the info! 

YoHo1975

No the rounded back units are the 90MACs. That is a 9043.

Also, I think, though someone else here probably knows for sure that all of the "classic" EMD M cabbed 90MACs are long gone and the remaining ones all have cabs like the SD70ACes

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,325 posts
Posted by Overmod on Friday, November 29, 2013 5:56 AM

McKey
No the rounded back units are the 90MACs. That is a 9043.

To amplify slightly (Peter may care to comment, too):

The 265H engine is not as 'tall' as the 710 2-stroke, so paradoxically the locomotive carbody height over the engine is not as great for the nominally-more-powerful version.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NW Wisconsin
  • 3,857 posts
Posted by beaulieu on Friday, November 29, 2013 10:10 AM

McKey

Do I get it right is I say this is an SD90MAC unit? Where the SD9043MAC would have a rounded section atop the engine, if the roundness has here any significance.

The locomotive in the photograph is a SD9043MAC(which is not an EMD model nomenclature). The flat section of the hood which is present on a 6,000 hp version of this locomotive with the 265H engine is not present on this locomotive. The flat sections were at a 45% angle to the hood sides and the top of the roof. Also the 6000 hp. versions were numbered between UP 8500 and UP 8560. All of these are now off the UP's roster. The UP 8500 series is currently occupied by the similar appearing SD70ACe, although if you know what to look for you can spot the differences.

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Sunday, December 1, 2013 11:45 PM

This is all from memory, so it may be a bit warped:

EMD wanted to only build 265H engine locomotives, but the prime mover still had (and still has) bugs. To not lose orders to GE, they built convertibles, still called SD90MAC. When the 265H was "ready", they designated those SD90MAC-H. Later improved models to fix some issues with the -Hs were designated SD90MAC-H as well, but had phase II cabs (like SD70ACe) and other modifications.

The SD90MAC-Hs have angled sides over the prime mover, SD90MACs do not, and look very close to SD80MACs.

The SD9043MAC was "invented" by railroads to help eliminate confusion over which "Big MAC" was in discussion.

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,813 posts
Posted by YoHo1975 on Friday, March 14, 2014 9:20 PM

There was a newer thread on the 9043s, but I can't seem to find it.

a little more than a week ago, one of the 9043s was off the sand track and in the shop. A fix had been tried back east. Now, some time this week all the 9043s have been pulled from the sand track. Presumably sent east for a fix.

  • Member since
    October 2013
  • 212 posts
Posted by McKey on Saturday, March 15, 2014 2:35 AM

This is very interesting news for all SD90 fans! And a clear proof that U.S. economy is recovering and is already back on track. Very much unlike the euro currency countries in Europe (outside Germany itself). 

YoHo1975

There was a newer thread on the 9043s, but I can't seem to find it.

a little more than a week ago, one of the 9043s was off the sand track and in the shop. A fix had been tried back east. Now, some time this week all the 9043s have been pulled from the sand track. Presumably sent east for a fix.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,476 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Saturday, March 15, 2014 10:09 AM

The SD9043AC's were being stored because of frame problems.  A fix was being tested on two of them and it seems to be working out so we'll see what happens.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    May 2007
  • From: Rocklin, California
  • 12 posts
Posted by georgeh on Saturday, March 15, 2014 6:10 PM

They all went to Stockton Yard some for movement east to be repaired, some to return to leasor and some to scrap.

George Halstead ghalstead@surewest.net
  • Member since
    September 2010
  • From: East Coast
  • 1,174 posts
Posted by D.Carleton on Sunday, March 16, 2014 8:19 PM

As of January there were a ton of them stored in North Platte.

Editor Emeritus, This Week at Amtrak

  • Member since
    May 2007
  • From: Rocklin, California
  • 12 posts
Posted by georgeh on Sunday, March 16, 2014 8:48 PM

I have been told there are a ton of them in Dunsmuir , CA too.

George Halstead ghalstead@surewest.net
  • Member since
    October 2013
  • 212 posts
Posted by McKey on Monday, March 17, 2014 12:20 AM

This might be a secondary consideration U.S. economy running on high gear but how does the 9043 fuel economy compare with the most recent models of EMD-Cat and GE?

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 1,864 posts
Posted by Leo_Ames on Monday, March 17, 2014 5:25 AM

It's competitive, that's a big reason why the Indiana Railroad leased some of this model instead of getting brand new power. They get many of the benefits for a fraction of the cost.

Their main faults rest with their electrical system, not their 710's. And with extra care, even that can be kept in check. The problems start when they're treated like their contemporaries and then their mean time between failures starts to plummet. 

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Monday, March 17, 2014 8:57 AM

Has there been a fix to their frame crack issues? That was another reason they were sidelined.

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,813 posts
Posted by YoHo1975 on Thursday, April 17, 2014 12:37 AM

The Frame crack is absolutely the only reason they were sidelined.

Sorry to raise this thread a month later without new information, but after I last posted I saw some repeats of already old info, some misinformation and confusions.

The SD9043s are not being returned to lessor or scrapped. At least not in major numbers. They are in process of getting the frame issue fixed. I would be very surprised if there are any in Dunsmir or any other west coast location.

Many were just renumbered to WP as they wait to be cycled through the shop to get their new 3000series number. The 8000s are being freed up for new units.

UP is super power short. I've seen dash 8cs and CWs along with 3 window SD60Ms and spartan SD60s going through Roseville shops and at the fuel rack. Engines that had been on the deadline for years here. In fact, a bunch of Dash8s came in from across the system over the past few weeks. UP is hurting without those 200+ 9043s.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy