Trains.com

New GE Plant in Texas...

2391 views
7 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2011
  • 165 posts
Posted by CPM500 on Monday, August 12, 2013 9:36 AM

Overmod

CSSHEGEWISCH
I looked at the picture carefully and came to the conclusion that TFM 1034 is actually on the track behind the boxcar.

I looked at the picture and concluded 'sideswipe'.  Note how the boxcar appears to have no trucks, you can see daylight through the roof, and the visible hood portion of 1034 is WAY too close to the visible side of the boxcar.

Sorry for the drift.  One other thing to look at with plant relocation is local incentives -- free or low-cost land, PILOT or other tax abatement/forgiveness, etc. 

Labor costs may certainly have something to do with it, as might particular state regulations on things like workmen's compensation, at-will employment, or right-to-work/open shop policies.

Couldn't agree more about local incentives. My point was that it is hard for a US manufacturer to compete with third-world labor rates-and all that goes with them.
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Saturday, August 10, 2013 8:14 AM

CSSHEGEWISCH
I looked at the picture carefully and came to the conclusion that TFM 1034 is actually on the track behind the boxcar.

I looked at the picture and concluded 'sideswipe'.  Note how the boxcar appears to have no trucks, you can see daylight through the roof, and the visible hood portion of 1034 is WAY too close to the visible side of the boxcar.

Sorry for the drift.  One other thing to look at with plant relocation is local incentives -- free or low-cost land, PILOT or other tax abatement/forgiveness, etc. 

Labor costs may certainly have something to do with it, as might particular state regulations on things like workmen's compensation, at-will employment, or right-to-work/open shop policies.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Saturday, August 10, 2013 6:50 AM

I looked at the picture carefully and came to the conclusion that TFM 1034 is actually on the track behind the boxcar.

I am also convinced that the real reason that Cat opened its Muncie plant and GE opened the Fort Worth plant was to reduce labor costs (union-busting).

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Friday, August 9, 2013 9:14 PM

Hello

EMD is building locomotives in Mexico at Bombardier's Sahagun plant.

Firelock76
Yeah, anyone buying a new diesel doesn't want the air conditioning provided courtesy of bullet holes.

An interesting side note to that is that the FRA has mandated that windshields withstand a bullet from a 22 rifle. This is why you see most cabooses have plated windows in transfer service, as it would cost too much to replace them.

That said, TFM apparently put 1034 in a boxcar body to protect it...

NW

 

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Friday, August 9, 2013 8:24 PM

Yeah, anyone buying a new diesel doesn't want the air conditioning provided courtesy of bullet holes.

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • 131 posts
Posted by Bonaventure10 on Friday, August 9, 2013 6:51 PM

Skills and the fact that there is a civil war going on in Mexico does not help either

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Rhode Island
  • 2,289 posts
Posted by carnej1 on Friday, August 9, 2013 11:24 AM

And it is true that EMD subcontracted a lot of assembly work to a fabricator in Mexico (San Luis Potasi, was part of N De M don't know who owns it now).

 However, since Cat/Progress rail acquired EMD that work seems to have shifted To EMD's new Indiana plant so maybe dirt cheap laboe isn't everything..

 

"I Often Dream of Trains"-From the Album of the Same Name by Robyn Hitchcock

  • Member since
    October 2011
  • 165 posts
New GE Plant in Texas...
Posted by CPM500 on Thursday, August 8, 2013 3:43 PM

A friend whose specialty is supply chain stuff remarked to me that the industrial labor rate in Mexico  is in the range of 1.65 to 2.25 USD/hr-for a 48 hour work week. This is cheaper than the Chinese  rate -even before  transportation, duties, etc. are factored in.

My thoughts:

  • Labor rates at  GE-Texas and PR- Muncie could be viewed as downright expensive by comparison to Mexico.
  • GE Aircraft Engines has a large presence in Mexico, over 1000 employees. One has to wonder if  beginning to move the loco business south of the border was politically tenable at this time.
  • It appears than sooner than later, less of the manufacturing equity for domestic locos will remain in Erie compared to EMD and their domestic production.
  • Perhaps EMD has regained their historical role as the low-cost producer.
  • If so, one would expect some additional flexibility in terms of pricing,i.e., ability to undercut the competition.

btw, the progressive station assembly line shown in Texas was used at the(years ago) modernized Alco plant  and GMD London.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy