Trains.com

first pictures of NJT/AMT ALP-45dp

3948 views
7 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Brewster, NY
  • 648 posts
first pictures of NJT/AMT ALP-45dp
Posted by Dutchrailnut on Tuesday, September 21, 2010 8:13 PM

posted by bregt:

http://s25.photobucket.com/albums/c63/bengts/ellok/ALP45/

 

 note the small pantograph?

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Thursday, September 23, 2010 12:54 PM

Wow!  Thanks for posting.  Transit-style fabricated wheels?

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Brewster, NY
  • 648 posts
Posted by Dutchrailnut on Friday, September 24, 2010 5:27 AM

nope, standard wheels, the bolts are for quill drive.

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • 2,741 posts
Posted by Paul Milenkovic on Friday, September 24, 2010 10:03 PM

The photographer's image is seen in at least one of the photos, reflected off the high gloss paint.

So this thing is like an EMD E-unit, with twin Diesels, carbody, and radiators mounted over the Diesels?  Doesn't this present problems with maintenance, such as changing out "power assemblies" (i.e. pistons)?

Quill drive, eh?  Amtrak's latest "order", in contrast, specs locomotives with axle-mounted traction motors (so called nose-hung).  Can you run axle-mounted traction motors at 110 MPH plus (or even 79 MPH) without pounding up the tracks, or does track work come out of "someone else budget"?  Does NJT know something Amtrak doesn't, or is it that Bombardier locomotives just "come that way", that Amtrak or NJT doesn't know their nose-hung from a quill-drive from a whatever or whether this has any effect on the tracks, and that people just purchase what the vendor serves up?

If GM "killed the electric car", what am I doing standing next to an EV-1, a half a block from the WSOR tracks?

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • From: North Jersey
  • 1,781 posts
Posted by ns3010 on Tuesday, September 28, 2010 7:26 PM

Let's just hope that the AMT locos will have that kind of "wave" design rather than what's in that hideous artist's portrayal...

My Model Railroad: Tri State Rail
My Photos on Flickr: Flickr
My Videos on Youtube: Youtube
My Photos on RRPA: RR Picture Archives

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Tuesday, September 28, 2010 8:18 PM

Paul Milenkovic

 

So this thing is like an EMD E-unit, with twin Diesels, carbody, and radiators mounted over the Diesels?  Doesn't this present problems with maintenance, such as changing out "power assemblies" (i.e. pistons)?

I suspect the engines are skid mounted engine gen sets.  You probably don't do individual power assembly change-outs.  Just swap out the whole thing...  I'll have to take a closer look a the photos...

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Tuesday, September 28, 2010 8:21 PM

Paul Milenkovic

Quill drive, eh?  Amtrak's latest "order", in contrast, specs locomotives with axle-mounted traction motors (so called nose-hung).  Can you run axle-mounted traction motors at 110 MPH plus (or even 79 MPH) without pounding up the tracks, or does track work come out of "someone else budget"?  Does NJT know something Amtrak doesn't, or is it that Bombardier locomotives just "come that way", that Amtrak or NJT doesn't know their nose-hung from a quill-drive from a whatever or whether this has any effect on the tracks, and that people just purchase what the vendor serves up?

People just purchase whatever the vendor serves up.  They might spec out ride quality/track force measurement performance spec and not care too much how you get there (as long as it doesn't drive maintenance costs thru the roof.  If you let Mechanical write the spec - you might get nose suspended traction motors written in because change out is cheap and easy.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Tuesday, September 28, 2010 8:28 PM

OK.  Looking at the general arrangement and the photos again, it looks like you can pull the fan hatch assembly and lift the engine gen set straight up.  It also looks like there is plenty of space to work on the diesel engine inside the carbody.  It's a high speed diesel with relatively small, man-handleable parts.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy