Trains.com

what do ya know bout the 44 ton center cabs

3809 views
10 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Saturday, February 27, 2010 6:50 AM

BNSFwatcher

GE also made "45-tonners".  Dunno why.  Maybe they came along after the unions relaxed their rules.  Some of them had side-rods.  Maybe the 44's did, too.  Anyone got definitive references?  Tnx.

Hays.

The 45-tonner was strictly an industrial design.  There were some internal differences, too.  The 44-tonner had two double-reduction traction motors on each truck, each hood extended to the end of the frame.  The 45-tonner had one traction motor per truck, with the axles connected by side rods or chains.  The hoods did not extend to the end of the frame.

The 44-tonner and the 70-tonner were the only light switcher models that GE specifically intended for the common carrier market.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    May 2009
  • 798 posts
Posted by BNSFwatcher on Friday, February 26, 2010 4:23 PM

Check out the "SIMS/Hugo Neu" 44-tonner on the "Ugly Locomotive" thread.  I don't think it is ugly....

Hays

  • Member since
    May 2009
  • 798 posts
Posted by BNSFwatcher on Friday, February 26, 2010 3:53 PM

GE also made "45-tonners".  Dunno why.  Maybe they came along after the unions relaxed their rules.  Some of them had side-rods.  Maybe the 44's did, too.  Anyone got definitive references?  Tnx.

Hays.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, February 25, 2010 3:35 PM

In the early 70's (and before) the B&O had a yard job that went on duty in the vicinity of the B&O Museum at Baltimore and used a GE 44 ton center cab to service the customers that were located on Pratt Street in Baltimore.  The track the job operated on was in the middle of Pratt street and to those that didn't know any better, was believed to be trolley car trackage, except there was no overhead trolley wires.  The job serviced 10/15 customers between the Museum and President Street.  For the most part, loads were taken to the customers and empties were pull from the customers.  The grade was descending from the Museum to President Street so this traffic flow worked well,  except if the number of cars to go back to the Museum exceeded 10 empties (roughly 300 tons) the the 44 toner would have to double its train to get all the cars back to the Museum area.

In the area that is now Harbor Place in Baltimore....back in the early 70's one could view two B&O yard crews actively servicing their customers between Light Street and President Street as another yard job from Locust Point using a EMD 600hp yard engine would shove it's way from Locust Point, down Key Highway and Light Street to Pratt street and on down to a Interchange with the Pennsylvania Railroad at President Street with a caboose leading the way and generally using a case of fusees a night to highlight the caboose to street traffic.

Sights that will never be seen again.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    May 2009
  • 798 posts
Posted by BNSFwatcher on Monday, February 22, 2010 8:57 AM

From my 4-5th grade classroom at Cinnibar School, in Petaluma, CA (1947-'49), I could watch the de-electrified Petaluma & Santa Rosa 44-tonners at work.  They seemed to pull a substantial number of cars.  Don't remember if they were ever double-headed.  Cool!  Farther in the distance, an occasional Northwestern Pacific train went by (in steam).  Cool, again!  Never saw any other trains, from the classrooms in NY, which is why I became such a poor student!  Lack of "Self-Espeesteam" is as good an excuse as any.  Har!  Shouldn't have said that....  Up in my new home of Vermont, the GE 70-tonners were ubiquitous on the St.J&LC and the M&B.  I even got to ride in some.

Hays 

 

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,486 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Saturday, February 20, 2010 9:40 AM

 

The Pennsylvania had about fifty of them at one point and managaement liked them because of the one man rule.  Performance on the other hand was not as good as the 0-4-0 switchers they replaced so there was a trade off. Basically they are all very light duty slow engines used primarily at industrial locations for moving short cuts of cars.  Most pictures I have seen show them handling four or less.  The one exception was Alton Steel in Alton Illinois that mated several with  44 ton slugs made from a cut down engine with billets on the frame for weight and radio controlled by an operator who would ride the footboards.  They often pulled ten and twelve car loads of billets in the mill.
  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: Southington, CT
  • 1,326 posts
Posted by DMUinCT on Saturday, February 20, 2010 9:21 AM

And the 90K agreement allowed a one man crew, no fireman.

Don U. TCA 73-5735

  • Member since
    July 2001
  • From: Shelbyville, Kentucky
  • 1,967 posts
Posted by SSW9389 on Saturday, February 20, 2010 9:16 AM
The 44 Ton center cab switchers were built in response to the 90,000 pound rule in a 1937 railroad labor agreement. These 44 Ton units were built by GE, the Canadian Locomotive Company, Davenport, Porter, Plymouth, and Whitcomb. Are we talking about all of these? Wink
COTTON BELT: Runs like a Blue Streak!
  • Member since
    February 2016
  • 176 posts
Posted by Tugboat Tony on Saturday, February 20, 2010 5:56 AM

I think most of them had a center cab as well.

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Calgary
  • 2,047 posts
Posted by cx500 on Saturday, February 20, 2010 12:52 AM

 They weigh about 44 tons. 

In other words, ask a vague question, get a generic reply.....

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: West Coast
  • 315 posts
what do ya know bout the 44 ton center cabs
Posted by countershot on Saturday, February 20, 2010 12:21 AM

what do ya know bout the 44 ton center cabs

http://community.webshots.com/album/337011280mnJplY http://photobucket.com/albums/c126/sd40-2/

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy