Trains.com

Caltrans F59PHI 710ECO

7488 views
8 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2005
  • 965 posts
Posted by Lyon_Wonder on Friday, July 24, 2009 8:04 PM

espeefoamer

As broke as California is,where do they get the money to "upgrade" F59PHIs.

Federal stimulus money?

  • Member since
    April 2008
  • 113 posts
Posted by AlienKing on Wednesday, July 22, 2009 10:25 AM

I think you guys might be blowing this way out of proportion. It's possible this upgrade could consist of putting in a new computer, changing a few of the electronic components, and adding a few new sensors. At the very least, a new 710ECO is quite likely a drop-in replacement for an older 710.

Taking a 40 year old FP40H and retrofitting it for a completely different block, electronics, etc is probably A LOT more expensive than doing a few smaller upgrades to some very similar units that are less than 10 years old.

In a few years, they will be required to use Tier 2. None of your current engines qualify. If its costs 3x more to upgrade a bunch of older worn out units, which would you choose to upgrade?

Here's a good analogy: Let's say you wanted to play the newest video game on your computer, but it's just not quite fast enough. You have two older computers, one thats a few years old, and one that's a dinosaur. With the newer computer, you could put in a bit more RAM and upgrade the video card for say $200 and it would play the game fine. With the old one, you could maybe reuse the keyboard, mouse, case, and possibly the CDROM. So basically its an entirely new computer, and would probably cost you $700. If your goal is to be able to play the game, the cheaper upgrade is the way to go.

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Tuesday, July 21, 2009 8:40 PM

As broke as California is,where do they get the money to "upgrade" F59PHIs.Why doesn't Caltrain put these engines in the older F40PHs instead.Throwing away perfectly good diesels makes no economical sense whatsoever.But then if California was more careful about where they spent their dollars we wouldn't be in the mess we are in now.SoapBox

Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Poulsbo, WA
  • 429 posts
Posted by creepycrank on Tuesday, July 21, 2009 2:51 PM
There's a lot of porkulus money floating around so instead of paying to rebuild the engines in kind they probably got a grant to replace them with new engines instead. EMD being in the business of building new engines I sure is happy to comply. Will slight improvements on 15 engines make the air safe, well you should never put your head down an exhaust pipe.
Revision 1: Adds this new piece Revision 2: Improves it Revision 3: Makes it just right Revision 4: Removes it.
  • Member since
    September 2005
  • 965 posts
Posted by Lyon_Wonder on Tuesday, July 21, 2009 1:35 AM

The F59PHIs already had a 12-710 before the 710ECO rebuild.  I think this is a move by  Caltrans to make the F59PHIs comply with stricter emissions standards.  This lead to my speculation that even GP59/60s could be rebuilt with a 710ECO, or even SD60-series and older SD70-series should EMD come out with a 16-710ECO.

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • 1,123 posts
Posted by HarveyK400 on Sunday, July 19, 2009 4:18 PM

Curious:

  • Do these locomotives have a separate HEP package; or is HEP taken from the primary diesel?
  • Will ballast be added to make up for the lost weight of the 16-645? 
  • Given the relatively short trains, 3,000 hp seems more than adequate.
  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: Southington, CT
  • 1,326 posts
Posted by DMUinCT on Sunday, July 19, 2009 8:55 AM

Glad to see that California has the money to upgrade perfectly good diesels to reduce some air emissions on a few dozen locomotives.

 

Don U. TCA 73-5735

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Rhode Island
  • 2,289 posts
Posted by carnej1 on Saturday, July 18, 2009 2:24 PM

Lyon_Wonder

Caltrans is in the process of refitting their entire F59PHI fleet with 710ECOs. Though the article doesn’t mention it, the 710ECO the F59PHIs get has to be 12-cylinder since they already had a 3,000hp 12-710.  I thought the 710ECO was specifically for upgrading 645-engine locos? It’s interesting that a 710ECO can be fitted to regular 710 powered locos too, which means a GP59 or GP60/60M could be refitted if a railroad wanted to.  I said GP60 too since they’d make a good 3,000hp 4-axle loco and I doubt anyone would downgrade a SD60/60M or any other 6-axle 16-710 with a 12-710ECO.   


http://www.ble.org/pr/news/headline.asp?id=26908 

Later this month, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) plans to introduce an environmentally friendly locomotive for its Amtrak California services. On July 22, the department will unveil the cleaner-diesel locomotive at Sacramento Valley Station.

Electro-Motive Diesel Inc. (EMD) has upgraded a Model F59PHI locomotive built in October 2001 into a 710ECO™ Repower unit, which features microprocessor-controlled engine technology designed to reduce emissions, increase fuel economy and boost reliability. The Repower unit meets the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Tier 2 emissions standard — two levels “cleaner” than the model requires, according to Caltrans.

The unit already has begun operating between Sacramento and the Bay Area along Amtrak California’s Capitol Corridor route. Caltrans plans to convert Amtrak California’s entire fleet of 15 F59PHI locomotives to Repower units, which would reduce emissions by about 50 percent, department officials believe.

The locomotive conversion is a joint effort between Caltrans, Amtrak, EMD, the EPA, Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority, California Air Resources Board, Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District and Bay Area Air Quality Management District.

 I would not be surprised to see some GP59s or GP60s rebuilt with the EMD ECO package but I suspect they would likely emerge as 8 cylinder GP22s..

"I Often Dream of Trains"-From the Album of the Same Name by Robyn Hitchcock

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • 965 posts
Caltrans F59PHI 710ECO
Posted by Lyon_Wonder on Saturday, July 18, 2009 2:04 PM

Caltrans is in the process of refitting their entire F59PHI fleet with 710ECOs. Though the article doesn’t mention it, the 710ECO the F59PHIs get has to be 12-cylinder since they already had a 3,000hp 12-710.  I thought the 710ECO was specifically for upgrading 645-engine locos? It’s interesting that a 710ECO can be fitted to regular 710 powered locos too, which means a GP59 or GP60/60M could be refitted if a railroad wanted to.  I said GP60 too since they’d make a good 3,000hp 4-axle loco and I doubt anyone would downgrade a SD60/60M or any other 6-axle 16-710 with a 12-710ECO.   


http://www.ble.org/pr/news/headline.asp?id=26908 

Later this month, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) plans to introduce an environmentally friendly locomotive for its Amtrak California services. On July 22, the department will unveil the cleaner-diesel locomotive at Sacramento Valley Station.

Electro-Motive Diesel Inc. (EMD) has upgraded a Model F59PHI locomotive built in October 2001 into a 710ECO™ Repower unit, which features microprocessor-controlled engine technology designed to reduce emissions, increase fuel economy and boost reliability. The Repower unit meets the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Tier 2 emissions standard — two levels “cleaner” than the model requires, according to Caltrans.

The unit already has begun operating between Sacramento and the Bay Area along Amtrak California’s Capitol Corridor route. Caltrans plans to convert Amtrak California’s entire fleet of 15 F59PHI locomotives to Repower units, which would reduce emissions by about 50 percent, department officials believe.

The locomotive conversion is a joint effort between Caltrans, Amtrak, EMD, the EPA, Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority, California Air Resources Board, Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District and Bay Area Air Quality Management District.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy