wjstix wrote:Seems to me there was a South American company that bought or leased the rights / tooling etc. to the Volkswagen "Beetle" and kept making them until the late 1990's?? I think there was also a company there that made Ford Model A's until the seventies or eighties....??
I think it was a Volkswagen plant in Brazil that continued to manufacture the "Beetle", not a licensing arrangement.
YoHo1975 wrote:Are they building 7FDLs or GEVOs?The original post implies 7FDLs, but 2 posts up the poster said Evolution series. edit: Wikipedia says they will be Evolution Series. Therefore the original poster is incorrect (regardless of any other agendas) GE is not exporting their old 7FDL (which by the way is not the same as the regular FDL that they started with. It's the 7th version of it) and it's not the HDL either. They're shipping their best product.So the entire foundation for this thread is in error.
Are they building 7FDLs or GEVOs?
The original post implies 7FDLs, but 2 posts up the poster said Evolution series.
edit: Wikipedia says they will be Evolution Series. Therefore the original poster is incorrect (regardless of any other agendas) GE is not exporting their old 7FDL (which by the way is not the same as the regular FDL that they started with. It's the 7th version of it) and it's not the HDL either. They're shipping their best product.
So the entire foundation for this thread is in error.
Good catch, although GE had previously supplied 7FDL engines to Kazakhstan, these will use the new GEVO engine.
In the old GE engine system the "7" didn't indicate a variation of the diesel engine, but rather just the category of equipment, in this case "Rotating Transportation Equipment" the variant is indicated by a suffix letter that is rarely quoted for GE locomotives. For example the diesel used in most C30-7s was a "7FDL-16F5" where the "F" indicated the 6th variant, and the "5" a subvariant. Very rare to find detailed information on this. My shop manual for UP AC6044CWs shows them as having a 7FDL-16G3 diesel engine.
My train videos - http://www.youtube.com/user/karldotcom
trainfan1221 wrote:Ummm.. How did this post suddenly get renamed halfway through?
Since the last update of the forum it has been possible to change the heading for each posting.
M636C
Many people have little idea of the real size of General Electric as a company. The concept that they need to keep a particular engine in production to remain a viable company is so much nonsense. This is a company with US$ 160 billion yearly revenue, in those terms an individual engine's contribution is less than rounding error.
New posters certainly are welcome to the forums. However, it is a stretch to believe this subject has attracted two new posters whose native language is not English, and both of them have the same viewpoint.
Jock Ellis Cumming, GA US of A Georgia Association of Railroad Passengers
I notice that both you and the OP are first time posters to this forum. Both of you are making troll type comments yet you cannot back up what you claim about GE. GE 7FDL12 engine can be UIC2 compliant as this linked story shows.
Rebuilds using new GE 7FDL engines
CSSHEGEWISCH wrote:If the FDL engines are so terrible, then why were so many used in locomotives sold to railroads in the United States and a host of other countries? As far as age is concerned, the 251 engine (still being manufactured both here and abroad) is also a half-century-old design.
It seems to me that GE has almost always made a profit on ventures it entered into. - a. s.
So know I know why Borat retired from journalism, he is now into locomotive sales. Thanks for the heads up!
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.