Trains.com

B & O Big Sixes

2952 views
7 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: Michigan City, In.
  • 781 posts
B & O Big Sixes
Posted by spikejones52002 on Monday, November 5, 2007 11:22 AM

I was just watching the B & O Big Sixes from the home page of trains.

Why are they called big SIXES when they all were 2-8-2s?

Thank You for the correction   I could not make out the 5 set of drivers. 2-10-2s not 2-8-2s.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Northern VA
  • 484 posts
Posted by feltonhill on Monday, November 5, 2007 12:42 PM
Their road numbers started with the number 6, e.g, 6100 for the first S1
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • 318 posts
Posted by VAPEURCHAPELON on Monday, November 5, 2007 1:40 PM
These engines were 2-10-2s, not 2-8-2s, and they were - while not the very largest of that wheel arrangement - really BIG.
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • 803 posts
Posted by GP40-2 on Monday, November 5, 2007 10:01 PM
As stated eariler, they were numbered in the 6000 series (hence "Sixes") and they were big. Built in the mid-1920's by both Baldwin and Lima for the B&O, they produced both high starting tractive effort and high horsepower at speed. Their boilers were similar in size to a Superpower 4-8-4. The Big Sixes could maintain 70MPH with a heavy frieght and produce 4000 DBHP. They were the biggest single reason why the B&O never bothered buying 4-8-4 in the 1940's, and they were so durable that they stayed in service until the late 1950's, with minimal maintenance.

Photo of Big Six 6124:

www.rr-fallenflags.org/bo/bo-s6124amm.jpg
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Tuesday, November 6, 2007 10:21 AM
A high-speed 2-10-2?  It would be interesting to find out how engine crews and the M/W department felt about fast running with a Big Six.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • 803 posts
Posted by GP40-2 on Tuesday, November 6, 2007 9:03 PM
 CSSHEGEWISCH wrote:
A high-speed 2-10-2?  It would be interesting to find out how engine crews and the M/W department felt about fast running with a Big Six.


The Big Sixes were in service for almost 35 years and were a favorite of the crews. Why are you so suprised by the B&O using a Big Six on fast freight? They had well designed and well balanced running gear. No worse on the track than a 4-8-4. Heck, the B&O ran their enormous 2-8-8-4 EM1s even faster in express freight service.
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Akron,OH
  • 229 posts
Posted by Kurn on Saturday, November 10, 2007 6:45 PM
They also excelled in pusher service.A couple of 'em could generally shove anything up Sandpatch.

If there are no dogs in heaven,then I want to go where they go.

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Ohio
  • 1,615 posts
Posted by Virginian on Thursday, November 22, 2007 8:55 AM
There have been very few sights/experiences to match an EM-1 and a pair of Big Sixes fighting a heavy train over Sand Patch in a steam lover's eyes.  Near the end, the ballast was black and yellow from all the Kodak boxes.
What could have happened.... did.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy