Is it more economical to operate one 4000 hp than two 2000 hp locomotives coupled together? A lower horsepower locomotive like a GP38-2 is probably more versatile than an AC4400CW...so why have builders been trying to outdo each other on horsepower? When those AC4400CW get old they probably won't be of much interest to short line operators whereas a lower horsepower more bi-directional hood unit would be, and that would be reflected in its resale value.
Ulrich wrote: Is it more economical to operate one 4000 hp than two 2000 hp locomotives coupled together? A lower horsepower locomotive like a GP38-2 is probably more versatile than an AC4400CW...so why have builders been trying to outdo each other on horsepower? When those AC4400CW get old they probably won't be of much interest to short line operators whereas a lower horsepower more bi-directional hood unit would be, and that would be reflected in its resale value.
Maybe you should ask Tim Allen. (insert grunts here)
Much lower ownership costs. Far fewer moving part, less cab equipment, fewer wheels, axles, & brake shoes, fewer inspections to do, less periodic maintenance to do, etc.
-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/)
According to those cost criteria the DDA40X should have been a resounding success... two engines on one frame... one cab...8 traction motors as opposed to an SD40/SD45 combo with two cabs...TWELVE motors etc...Yet the DDA40X didn't really catch on. You would think twin engine locomotives that can use existing engines to generate 9000 hp would be a hit...but where are they?
Ulrich wrote: According to those cost criteria the DDA40X should have been a resounding success... two engines on one frame... one cab...8 traction motors as opposed to an SD40/SD45 combo with two cabs...TWELVE motors etc...Yet the DDA40X didn't really catch on. You would think twin engine locomotives that can use existing engines to generate 9000 hp would be a hit...but where are they?
Well, if you have something go wrong on a DDA40X that takes it out of service, you are losing what would be two SD40's. Its just a balancing act for the right package. Railroads do not look at resale costs when it buys equipment, they just look at performance and cost issues. No one can predict what a locomotive resale value will be in 30 years.
An "expensive model collector"
Mike WSOR engineer | HO scale since 1988 | Visit our club www.WCGandyDancers.com
n012944 wrote: Ulrich wrote: According to those cost criteria the DDA40X should have been a resounding success... two engines on one frame... one cab...8 traction motors as opposed to an SD40/SD45 combo with two cabs...TWELVE motors etc...Yet the DDA40X didn't really catch on. You would think twin engine locomotives that can use existing engines to generate 9000 hp would be a hit...but where are they? Well, if you have something go wrong on a DDA40X that takes it out of service, you are loosing what would be two SD40's. Its just a balancing act for the right package. Railroads do not look at resale costs when it buys equipment, they just look at performance and cost issues. No one can predict what a locomotive resale value will be in 30 years.
Well, if you have something go wrong on a DDA40X that takes it out of service, you are loosing what would be two SD40's. Its just a balancing act for the right package. Railroads do not look at resale costs when it buys equipment, they just look at performance and cost issues. No one can predict what a locomotive resale value will be in 30 years.
...you're losing 2 GP40s.....
And, a DD40AX only saves you the cab and a pair of couplers and draft gear. You still have two complete locomotives under the hood - and the same number of axles and TMs.
Thats right, 2 GP40's.....I knew that
oltmannd wrote: n012944 wrote: Ulrich wrote: According to those cost criteria the DDA40X should have been a resounding success... two engines on one frame... one cab...8 traction motors as opposed to an SD40/SD45 combo with two cabs...TWELVE motors etc...Yet the DDA40X didn't really catch on. You would think twin engine locomotives that can use existing engines to generate 9000 hp would be a hit...but where are they? Well, if you have something go wrong on a DDA40X that takes it out of service, you are loosing what would be two SD40's. Its just a balancing act for the right package. Railroads do not look at resale costs when it buys equipment, they just look at performance and cost issues. No one can predict what a locomotive resale value will be in 30 years....you're losing 2 GP40s..... And, a DD40AX only saves you the cab and a pair of couplers and draft gear. You still have two complete locomotives under the hood - and the same number of axles and TMs.
Plus, those 4 axle trucks were probably a real headache.
TomDiehl wrote:Plus, those 4 axle trucks were probably a real headache.
They are great for testing the track. The UP engineering dept. uses the 6936 on inspection trains. If there are any irregularities in the track, the engine wiggles and waggles, and sends the extra motions to the office and testing cars.
I got to see a WSOR SD40-2 tie up traffic on University Avenue while switching a long cut of hopper cars at the Randall crossing on the Friday before the Indiana game. It made a cool whistling sound as it powered up to back that string of cars through the crossing, although I don't quite understand the logic of an EMD turbocharged 6-axle unit used as a switcher.
At the same crossing, I saw a two-unit consist of GP-38's today, with the lead unit making lots of smoke as it accelerated the train through the crossing, and the smoke didn't smell like Diesel fumes but more like the fumes from smoke oil drops you put in a model train steam engine with a smoke unit.
If I work at one of the PC's at Computer Aided Engineering, I can look out these big picture windows and watch the trains go by, and they blow their horns to tell you they are coming after the Mayor of Madison lost the battle with the Federal Railroad Administration about no-horn crossings. Who needs a model railroad when there is 12 inch scale?
If GM "killed the electric car", what am I doing standing next to an EV-1, a half a block from the WSOR tracks?
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.