Trains.com

Dual-Control locos

6603 views
14 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Dual-Control locos
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, May 31, 2007 3:40 AM
I know that the Southern had dual-control locos from EMD and GE, but I was wondering about other RR that also purchased that option. I know some already. PRSL GP38s 2001-2014, RDG  SD45s 7600-7604, and PC GP38s 7815-7824 as well as an order of U23Bs. The EMDs had a distinctive built-out cab to accomdate the control layout.
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Thursday, May 31, 2007 5:43 AM

A couple of clarifications and additions:

"PRSL" GP38s 2010-2014, were actually PC.  PRSL ordered them, but couldn't afford them when they were built.  PC took them instead.  These and the 2000-2009 actually had a single control stand, but had mechanical linkage to operate the throttle from the LH side.  To accomodate the linkage, the front cab wall had to by bumped out a few inches.

The PC U23Bs weren't really dual control, they were bi-directional.  They had a single control stand that was placed parallel to the side wall of the cab so that you could turn the seat either way and still have easy access to the controls.  PC also bought some GP38-2s with this arrangment.   The Southern had started the practice and the PC president at the time of these purchase was a Moore, an ex-SOU guy.

Conrail also has the ex-EL SD45-2s that had dual control stands.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Thursday, May 31, 2007 6:57 AM
N&W was very big on dual controls, I don't have too many specifics on which locomotives were so equipped.  VGN did buy its Train Masters with dual controls.  As you might imagine, it was an expensive option and took up a lot of space in the cab.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, May 31, 2007 12:07 PM
RF&P GP35's and GP40's were dual-control units and were often run long hood forward. SW1500 #91 was also equipped with dual-controls.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, June 2, 2007 7:49 PM
 oltmannd wrote:

A couple of clarifications and additions:

"PRSL" GP38s 2010-2014, were actually PC.  PRSL ordered them, but couldn't afford them when they were built.  PC took them instead.  These and the 2000-2009 actually had a single control stand, but had mechanical linkage to operate the throttle from the LH side.  To accomodate the linkage, the front cab wall had to by bumped out a few inches.

The PC U23Bs weren't really dual control, they were bi-directional.  They had a single control stand that was placed parallel to the side wall of the cab so that you could turn the seat either way and still have easy access to the controls.  PC also bought some GP38-2s with this arrangment.   The Southern had started the practice and the PC president at the time of these purchase was a Moore, an ex-SOU guy.

Conrail also has the ex-EL SD45-2s that had dual control stands.

I guess the PC GP38/38-2s and the RDG SD45s were the only ones needing the "bumped-out" cabs.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Sunday, June 3, 2007 5:16 PM

The MP had some dual control hi-hood GP7's.

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 400 posts
Posted by rrboomer on Sunday, June 3, 2007 6:29 PM

To go back even further the C&O had dual control BL-2's, their 1846 being one of them. The left hand controls where tucked in to the rear of the fireman's side cab door. It was a a tight fit. I was never in the cab of any other C&O BL-2's so don't know if this was one of many, or the only one.

Other dual control units I can think of where Soo 2556 (psgr GP9) and many of the CB&Q SD9's.

The Rock Island's had 15 "Suburban" dual control RS-3's 485-499. Also dual were the RI's two H-15-44's 400 and 401. The RI BL-2's were not dual control.

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Over yonder by the roundhouse
  • 1,224 posts
Posted by route_rock on Tuesday, June 5, 2007 4:49 PM

  Our SD-9s have dual control ( BNSF) not sure the heritage of these old dogs but they are still out there running ( some are even lead qualified!!!!)

 

Yes we are on time but this is yesterdays train

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, June 10, 2007 12:05 PM
I seem to recall that the Minneapolis Northfield & Southern Baldwin center cab diesels had dual controls. 
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Friday, June 15, 2007 5:18 PM

I think that all of the C&O BL2s, at least in the 1840-1847 series, had dual controls (I guess I should look it up).

The Chicago Great Western had a number of TR2s that had dual controls.  CNW kept the stands there at least until it rebuilt some of them in the early 1970s, though they never used them, that I'm aware of.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 20, 2007 2:44 PM

 

 

 I understand, during the Nineteen-Fifties, that CP had Two 539 MLW Switchers Modified so they could be 'Run' from Either Side where a Man was Required on the Left Side of Cab part of the time to Watch for Hand Signals From Switchmen.

This was during the 'Getting Rid of the Fireman' Phase while Steam was on the way out.

 Can anyone Supply more info on this, Please?

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Thursday, June 21, 2007 10:08 AM
 SDR_North wrote:

 

 

 I understand, during the Nineteen-Fifties, that CP had Two 539 MLW Switchers Modified so they could be 'Run' from Either Side where a Man was Required on the Left Side of Cab part of the time to Watch for Hand Signals From Switchmen.

This was during the 'Getting Rid of the Fireman' Phase while Steam was on the way out.

 Can anyone Supply more info on this, Please?

There was an article in TRAINS from the early 1960's when Battle Creek yard was expanded and rebuilt, but as a flat-switching facility.  GTW assigned S2's which were oriented on the switch leads to have the control on the outside of the lead so the engineer could see the switchmen.  There were also a trio of SW900's which were floaters (could be assigned to any lead) and were equipped with dual controls to put the engineer on the outside of the lead without having to turn the locomotive.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,537 posts
Posted by jchnhtfd on Wednesday, June 27, 2007 8:08 PM
I have a vague and fuzzy recollection of a few ex N&W Alco RS11's with dual controls -- but that may be quite wrong...
Jamie
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Wednesday, June 27, 2007 8:52 PM
Southern Pacific  had 10 passenger GP9s used in Commute service equipped with dual controls to prevent their having to be turned at the end of the run.Four of these were "torpedo boat" units built without dynamic brakes. These had the air tanks on top of the long hood.
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: North Idaho
  • 1,311 posts
Posted by jimrice4449 on Wednesday, June 27, 2007 11:18 PM
The SP Geeps were identifiable by having the orange and silver wings on both ends.   The main purpose was to run on a branch of the commute service w/o turning facilities at the end.   During steam operations some of the engines assigned to this service had pilots on the tender.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy