Trains.com

CSX #4000 SD40-3 spartan cab?

11857 views
13 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2005
  • 965 posts
CSX #4000 SD40-3 spartan cab?
Posted by Lyon_Wonder on Tuesday, December 21, 2010 4:04 PM

CSX #4000 has an unusual spartan cab with a flat nose section that’s almost reminiscent of the C&NW’s Crandall cab E8s.  My guess is it's a homemade cab CSX fabricated themselves.   

CXS Spartan cab

http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=2343179

C&NW Crandall cab

http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=27890&nseq=2

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • From: Troy, AL
  • 724 posts
Posted by BamaCSX83 on Tuesday, December 21, 2010 10:12 PM

it would appear, based off the comments on the rrpicturearchives site that the nose on the locomotive is the same as the NRE genset locomotive noses, so it might not be a "homeade" job.  It at least still looks more or less like a standard EMD cab and nose, albeit with a few changes.  Could be worse, could actually BE a Crandall Cab...

  • Member since
    September 2006
  • 158 posts
Posted by Bryan Jones on Wednesday, December 22, 2010 5:12 AM

The new nose and nose found on CSX #4000 was not fabricated by CSX nor designed by CSX, it was acquired via third party vendor. All of the SD40-3 rebuilds will feature this design.

Bryan Jones

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Wednesday, December 22, 2010 6:43 AM

The cab and nose have a definite resemblance to something from a standard nose B40-8 or C40-8.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Mooresville, NC
  • 90 posts
Posted by FTGT725 on Saturday, December 25, 2010 8:23 PM

IMHO, the 4000 looks a whole lot better than the Crandel cab.

In my experience, the light at the end of the tunnel is usually the train.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Monday, December 27, 2010 9:13 AM

Then there's NS 6900 (SD60E) :


http://www.nsdash9.com/rosters/6900.html

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • From: Troy, AL
  • 724 posts
Posted by BamaCSX83 on Tuesday, December 28, 2010 10:52 PM

Well that is certainly different.  What other changes did NS make to the 6900 to make it an SD60E, just as I'm curious to know what CSX did to make 4000 a SD40-3, I'm sure that there was an electronics upgrade in both, but I'm curious as to if anyone knows specifics.

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 1,881 posts
Posted by Leo_Ames on Thursday, December 30, 2010 1:06 AM

Besides the obvious (The new widecab to replace the damaged Spartan cab), it's been upgraded to Tier 0 standards.and has a EM2000 microprocessor control system with an all new electrical cabinet. The prime mover is now a 710G3B-EC . The locomotive has been changed to short hood forward operation. KNORR (CCB2) electronic air brake and motor-driven air compressor installed along with  "Layover equipment" and split cooling installed.

Got some of that information from a web forum, and confirmed those details and got several additional details from the AltoonaWorks website.

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • From: Troy, AL
  • 724 posts
Posted by BamaCSX83 on Thursday, December 30, 2010 10:47 AM

thank you sir, that information is much appreciated.

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Rhode Island
  • 2,289 posts
Posted by carnej1 on Thursday, December 30, 2010 1:09 PM

IINM, The SD40-2s CSX is rebuilding to Dash 3 specs are getting completely remanufactured prime movers and alternators as well as a Q-Tron Microprocessor control system.

"I Often Dream of Trains"-From the Album of the Same Name by Robyn Hitchcock

  • Member since
    February 2016
  • 176 posts
Posted by Tugboat Tony on Saturday, January 1, 2011 12:29 AM

I would imagine the corners of the nose have a big piece of steel that is ment to help with crashworthyness. The original nose being nothing but sheet metal.  

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,879 posts
Posted by YoHo1975 on Monday, January 3, 2011 5:21 PM

If they put in the split cooling and replaced/upgraded the prime mover, why not go to a T2 prime mover. Why the EC?

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NW Wisconsin
  • 3,857 posts
Posted by beaulieu on Monday, January 3, 2011 5:58 PM

YoHo1975

If they put in the split cooling and replaced/upgraded the prime mover, why not go to a T2 prime mover. Why the EC?

Still higher costs to install common rail fuel injection system. Plus you would have EMD as the only possible parts supplier for parts that close to current production. Parts for EC engines are available on the remanufactured market.

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,879 posts
Posted by YoHo1975 on Tuesday, January 4, 2011 11:58 AM

And thinking about it, NS doesn't have to deal with any Fleet wide Emissions agreements with CARB the way UP and BNSF do, so the cost may not be worth it. 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy