Trains.com

road diesel oil change

15036 views
11 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2008
  • From: K.I.S.S- Keep it simple stupid
  • 676 posts
road diesel oil change
Posted by teen steam fan on Monday, May 3, 2010 6:50 PM

Anyone know how railroads change the motor oil in those big prime movers in the road diesels? I can imagine that those bad boys need GALLONS of oil per change, and what about the filters? How often do they do it? Every year or overhaul?

If you can read this... thank a teacher. If you are reading this in english... thank a veteran

When in doubt. grab a hammer. 

If it moves and isn't supposed to, get a hammer

If it doesn't move and is supposed to, get a hammer

If it's broken, get a hammer

If it can't be fixed with a hammer... DUCK TAPE!

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NW Wisconsin
  • 3,857 posts
Posted by beaulieu on Monday, May 3, 2010 8:06 PM
teen steam fan

Anyone know how railroads change the motor oil in those big prime movers in the road diesels? I can imagine that those bad boys need GALLONS of oil per change, and what about the filters? How often do they do it? Every year or overhaul?

Filters are changed on a schedule since you do not need to drain the oil to change them. The oil itself is only changed when it becomes too contaminated. A sample of the oil is taken at regular intervals and sent to the railroad's metallurgy lab where it is analyzed. They look for traces of metal indicating wear of engine bearings and piston rings, how much carbon from blow-by, and how much unburned fuel is getting into the oil. Finally they check for the oil's lubricating qualities and viscosity. When any of these factors gets beyond acceptable limits the oil must be changed. And yes, the oil capacity of a modern road locomotive is well over 100 gallons.


  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Monday, May 3, 2010 11:36 PM

 Twice we had diesels that came fresh from the shops with the filters improperly installed (or something like that) that then decided to puke all their lube oil out the bottom.  What a mess.  But on the bright side, the clean-up company got to make a little money. 

And no, there was no point in this story.  But it did mean they needed more oil....  

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Poulsbo, WA
  • 429 posts
Posted by creepycrank on Friday, May 7, 2010 10:50 AM
The item I use to watch on lube oil analysis reports is the TBN (total base number) a measure of alkalinity that is required to counteract acid formation from blow-by combustion products. EMD took advantage of high oil consumption in that fresh oil was frequently added to keep the TBN high enough that the engine could run for years without changing it. Three things have happened to change that . The first was the oil companies produced high TBN oil as a result of their program to deal with engines running on bunker C fuel with sulfur content of up to 2%, no.2 diesel is supposed to be 0.2%. The second is that at EMD anyway the lube oil carry over hurt the EPA ratings at low power where the engine exhaust temperature is not enough to burn the oil. The third is the introduction of ultra low sulfur fuel further reducing the acidification of the lube oil. So now they can reduce the lube oil consumption without compromising the change-out interval. The truck type engines is another matter and Cummins has developed something called Centinal oil management system. The system is an controlled oil leak into a oil tank with ,make-up from a clean oil tank so that the oil stays "fresh". A computer feeds the dirty oil into the fuel to burn so we are right back where we started from except for maintenance to that system.
Revision 1: Adds this new piece Revision 2: Improves it Revision 3: Makes it just right Revision 4: Removes it.
  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Terre Haute IN
  • 199 posts
Posted by robscaboose on Saturday, May 15, 2010 1:16 AM

DeadI helped add oil to a short line SW 1200 one day & they used a fork lift to pick up a 55 gal drum with a hose & spigot to add the oil

Rob

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Monday, May 17, 2010 7:57 AM
teen steam fan

Anyone know how railroads change the motor oil in those big prime movers in the road diesels? I can imagine that those bad boys need GALLONS of oil per change, and what about the filters? How often do they do it? Every year or overhaul?

A locomotive diesel engine crankcase holds about 400 gallons, so an oil change is a pretty pricey exercise!

As pointed out by others, the oil is changed only when it is "worn out". The two most common reasons for draining the oil are pH and viscosity. The oil becomes slightly more acidic with use as the sulfur in the fuel can become sulfuric acid and can wind up in the oil. Obviously, acid is not a good thing to have in the oil. The oil is buffered to withstand this, but oil that starts out too basic is also not good for engine wear.

The oil's viscosity goes down as the oil molecules shear. The mechanical action in the engine can actually tear the oil molecules into pieces, making the oil less able to lubricate. This also make the oil less viscous.

Abnormal conditions such as water leaks, fuel leaks and failing engine parts can also show up in the oil sample and require an oil change.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, May 17, 2010 2:17 PM

Some of you may recall, about 15 to 20 years ago, a ocean going vessel was operating in the Mississippi River at New Orleans....the vessel experienced engine failure and lost steerage in the currents of the river and ended up striking the consumer water front pier attraction in New Orleans.

The NTSB investigation of the incident revealed that the marine diesel engine of the vessel shut down because it had tripped the engines low oil alarm....if I recall the numbers correctly the oiling system for the engine had dropped to only having 2700 Gallons of oil in the system....at normal operating levels the engine should have had 3500 Gallons of oil in the system.

Take that Jiffy Lube!

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Poulsbo, WA
  • 429 posts
Posted by creepycrank on Monday, May 17, 2010 3:47 PM
BaltACD

Some of you may recall, about 15 to 20 years ago, a ocean going vessel was operating in the Mississippi River at New Orleans....the vessel experienced engine failure and lost steerage in the currents of the river and ended up striking the consumer water front pier attraction in New Orleans.

The NTSB investigation of the incident revealed that the marine diesel engine of the vessel shut down because it had tripped the engines low oil alarm....if I recall the numbers correctly the oiling system for the engine had dropped to only having 2700 Gallons of oil in the system....at normal operating levels the engine should have had 3500 Gallons of oil in the system.

Take that Jiffy Lube!

You have to be precise by what you mean by "low lube oil". It can mean low level or low pressure. In the above case there should have been an alarm without the shut down. In a narrow channel they should have had someone ready at the alarm panel and have it switched to "emergency run" which means that you get the alarm without the shutdown signal. Then at least the engineers can verify that there is an emergency. Bringing it back to locomotives, since there is no attendant it should shut down for either. About 30 years ago I was in a similar situation on a sea trial for a new tug and the steering went hard over just as it left the dock in Harvey. The tug was swept down toward the ocean until rescued by a passing tug. A hour later they had the steering controls fixed and its run well ever since.
Revision 1: Adds this new piece Revision 2: Improves it Revision 3: Makes it just right Revision 4: Removes it.
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, May 17, 2010 7:08 PM

creepycrank
BaltACD

Some of you may recall, about 15 to 20 years ago, a ocean going vessel was operating in the Mississippi River at New Orleans....the vessel experienced engine failure and lost steerage in the currents of the river and ended up striking the consumer water front pier attraction in New Orleans.

The NTSB investigation of the incident revealed that the marine diesel engine of the vessel shut down because it had tripped the engines low oil alarm....if I recall the numbers correctly the oiling system for the engine had dropped to only having 2700 Gallons of oil in the system....at normal operating levels the engine should have had 3500 Gallons of oil in the system.

Take that Jiffy Lube!

You have to be precise by what you mean by "low lube oil". It can mean low level or low pressure. In the above case there should have been an alarm without the shut down. In a narrow channel they should have had someone ready at the alarm panel and have it switched to "emergency run" which means that you get the alarm without the shutdown signal. Then at least the engineers can verify that there is an emergency. Bringing it back to locomotives, since there is no attendant it should shut down for either. About 30 years ago I was in a similar situation on a sea trial for a new tug and the steering went hard over just as it left the dock in Harvey. The tug was swept down toward the ocean until rescued by a passing tug. A hour later they had the steering controls fixed and its run well ever since.

http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/1998/MAR9801.pdf

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    November 2007
  • 6 posts
Posted by Pat Masterson on Monday, May 17, 2010 7:20 PM

 Our old EMD takes about 220 gallons or so. when it gets way down to the "add oil" we also pump in a 55 gallon drum.

-Pat
  • Member since
    May 2010
  • 11 posts
Posted by dtandi on Tuesday, May 18, 2010 10:54 PM

I read an article in, I beleve, TRAINS magazine that said that the short answer is that railroads don't change the oil in a locomotive unless it is going through a major maintenance or repair where the draining of the oil is necessary.

One reason is that the oil does not really wear out; It is the additives in the oil, like those that fight corrosion (see the reference to acid build-up in another post) and the detergents added to make particulate contaminants clump together so they can be removed by filters. Railroads have laboratories that regularly take samples of oil from each locomotive to see where the additive levels are at and how effective they are being at doing their job, If the additives are starting to wear out, additives are added to the exisitng enging oil and the very effective oil filters are changed.

We could actually do the same with automobiles, except that the amount of oil in my Ford Taurus is 5 quarts vs,the hundreds of gallons of oil that a locomotive uses. Plus, I don't have an oil laboratory set up in my garage. As a result it is far easier and more economical to simply change out the 4 or 5 quarts of oil I use.

One other factor is the fact that diesel engines run at high temperatures and that part of the film of oil between the piston and the cylinder gets burned off with each power stroke. This means that a diesel engine is constantly consuming the older oil, albeit slowly, so that fresh oil is constantly being added to the system. 

Thanks again to however wrote the original article in TRAINS. 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Allen, TX
  • 1,320 posts
Posted by cefinkjr on Thursday, May 20, 2010 8:32 PM

beaulieu
A sample of the oil is taken at regular intervals and sent to the railroad's metallurgy lab where it is analyzed.

I was an NYC Operating Management Trainee when this kind of thing was first being used there.  Some bright young engineer had written a program that ran on an IBM 360-20 (a baby computer then) to predict component failure.  An engine oil sample was taken from every unit fueled at Collinwood (Cleveland).  The story at the lab was that they had been having trouble getting units into Collinwood for maintenance until one failed --- when, where, and how predicted --- on a very important train.  The Transportation Department was much more cooperative after that.

Chuck
Allen, TX

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy