Trains.com

the x after csx

2873 views
22 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: iron ridge
  • 204 posts
the x after csx
Posted by wisandsouthernkid on Saturday, December 15, 2007 6:22 PM
what does the x after csx and other roads like utlx dowx and others mean i would like to know
the happiest people in the world dont have the best of everything, but make the best out of everything they have
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Saturday, December 15, 2007 7:02 PM

 wisandsouthernkid wrote:
what does the x after csx and other roads like utlx dowx and others mean i would like to know

In CSX' case, IIRC from a Brian Solomon book, the "C" stands for Chessie (C&O, B&O, Western Maryland, considerable exx-NYCentral, etc.); the "S" stands for Seaboard (SCL, ACL, SAL, Family Lines, Clinchfield, L&N and many others).  The "X" stands for the unknown factor, as in math:  the "X" being the supposed (supposed) benefits of synergy between the two already megasystems.  IMHO the dual empires remain largely route-incompatable and CSX as well as not needn't have bothered with whitewashing out Chessie, Family Lines, etc. from grain hoppers, boxcars, etc.   

I do have to admit that the "CSX" put on new shipping cubes and sleds is much more impressive. 

If others read this post, you are sure to hear different interpretations!  Shock [:O] 

 

al-in-chgo
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Saturday, December 15, 2007 7:48 PM
 al-in-chgo wrote:

 wisandsouthernkid wrote:
what does the x after csx and other roads like utlx dowx and others mean i would like to know

In CSX' case, IIRC from a Brian Solomon book, the "C" stands for Chessie (C&O, B&O, Western Maryland, considerable exx-NYCentral, etc.); the "S" stands for Seaboard (SCL, ACL, SAL, Family Lines, Clinchfield, L&N and many others).  The "X" stands for the unknown factor, as in math:  the "X" being the supposed (supposed) benefits of synergy between the two already megasystems.  IMHO the dual empires remain largely route-incompatable and CSX as well as not needn't have bothered with whitewashing out Chessie, Family Lines, etc. from grain hoppers, boxcars, etc.   

I do have to admit that the "CSX" put on new shipping cubes and sleds is much more impressive. 

If others read this post, you are sure to hear different interpretations!  Shock [:O] 

 

PS:  Gee, I left out the second part of your question.  "X" as a letter at the end of a three- or four-letter code can represent ownership (TTX).  A four letter code ending in "X" can also mean an end-user -- WEPX means Wisconsin Electric Power (plant, dynamo).  You're sure to see the latter type of code on unit coal trains. 

C'mon, all you out there, there are plenty of examples and more precise definitions.  Help!!! Shock [:O]

al-in-chgo
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • 98 posts
Posted by IRONHORSE77 on Saturday, December 15, 2007 10:38 PM

The suffix X as in GATX, CSX means corporation.

Chuck

PS Check google

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Mesa, AZ
  • 778 posts
Posted by silicon212 on Saturday, December 15, 2007 10:45 PM

It was my understanding, CSX notwithstanding, that the "X" meant private entity, not railroad owned.  IE GATX, UTLX, TTX etc. 

CSX is alone in that it is a railroad name.

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 281 posts
Posted by rogruth on Sunday, December 16, 2007 12:02 AM
The reporting mark for the CSX railroad company is CSXT.
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Sunday, December 16, 2007 12:10 AM

 rogruth wrote:
The reporting mark for the CSX railroad company is CSXT.
 

Good point!  The "T" stands for Transportation, and it is CSXT that actually moves the freight. 

Semantics-wise, this is very similar to Penn Central Transportation Co., which ran the trains while Penn Central (Corp., I think, I'm not sure) was more of a holding company. Forty years ago Stuart Saunders excelled not only in deferring maintenance on the Pennsy, later Penn Central, he more or less looted it for parts when possible. 

One hopes CSX, which owns CSXT, is not behaving that way today.  - a. s.

 

al-in-chgo
  • Member since
    July 2007
  • From: Austin,TX
  • 537 posts
Posted by chefjavier on Sunday, December 16, 2007 12:34 AM
Good points but I still dislike CSX!Sign - Welcome [#welcome]
Javier
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Sunday, December 16, 2007 12:59 AM

 chefjavier wrote:
Good points but I still dislike CSX!Sign - Welcome [#welcome]

I agree with you, but OTOH being in Folkston, GA, for the "funnel' effect was wonderful for me. 

 

al-in-chgo
  • Member since
    July 2007
  • From: Austin,TX
  • 537 posts
Posted by chefjavier on Sunday, December 16, 2007 2:54 PM
To tell you the truth the CSX locomotive are ugly in color if they would stay with Chessie System color. They would have more fans! Whistling [:-^]
Javier
  • Member since
    February 2007
  • 44 posts
Posted by rgappel on Monday, December 17, 2007 11:08 AM
I recall reading somewhere that the C stood for Chessie, the S for Seaboard, and the X was for "and others".
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,518 posts
Posted by zugmann on Monday, December 17, 2007 11:24 AM

 chefjavier wrote:
To tell you the truth the CSX locomotive are ugly in color if they would stay with Chessie System color. They would have more fans! Whistling [:-^]

I'm sure CSX management is losing sleep over your last statement... 

  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: The 17th hole at TPC
  • 2,260 posts
Posted by n012944 on Monday, December 17, 2007 1:04 PM

 chefjavier wrote:
To tell you the truth the CSX locomotive are ugly in color if they would stay with Chessie System color. They would have more fans! Whistling [:-^]

Because we all know that reasons railroads are in business is to have more fans. That being said, CSX has a nice color scheme, much like that of the B&O and C&O.  As for the Chessie scheme, the seventies are over pal.

An "expensive model collector"

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 281 posts
Posted by rogruth on Monday, December 17, 2007 2:43 PM

Aren't the actual reporting marks on rolling stock CSXT?

 

I have heard several different things for the X.The one I liked best is eXpanded. 

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • 803 posts
Posted by GP40-2 on Monday, December 17, 2007 4:25 PM
This thing has been rehashed about 1 million times. Here is the Cliff Note version:

CSX was the creation of Chessie System chairman Hays Watkins. The "C" stands for Chessie, the "S" for Seaboard and the "X" was a feel-good "together we a much more". Anyone who was working for them when this happened (like me) knows CSX is just a larger C&O/B&O. When I retired from CSX, is was no different from when I started with the B&O in the '70s. Same management culture, etc. It is no accident that the CSX paint scheme looks very similar to the C&O and B&O schemes from the past.

The "T" on the reporting marks is meaningless other than the fact that reporting marks ending in "X" denote a private railcar owner. Railway company reporting marks can't end in "X", hence CSX just stuck a "T" on the end to pacify the Feds.

That's the facts. I'm sure you guys will get this wrong in a week or two. Actually it is amusing to read all the conspiracy theories on CSX's name and their evil plots to take over the Universe.
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Monday, December 17, 2007 4:46 PM

from GP-40-2's post:  "Anyone who was working for them when this happened (like me) knows CSX is just a larger C&O/B&O."  (partial quotation from prior post)

 

Which leaves the question(s):  but what of Family Lines (SCL, Clinchfield, L&N)?  - al 

 

al-in-chgo
  • Member since
    July 2007
  • From: Austin,TX
  • 537 posts
Posted by chefjavier on Monday, December 17, 2007 6:45 PM
 n012944 wrote:

 chefjavier wrote:
To tell you the truth the CSX locomotive are ugly in color if they would stay with Chessie System color. They would have more fans! Whistling [:-^]

Because we all know that reasons railroads are in business is to have more fans. That being said, CSX has a nice color scheme, much like that of the B&O and C&O.  As for the Chessie scheme, the seventies are over pal.

Thanks for the motivation! Yeah!! [yeah]

Javier
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • 803 posts
Posted by GP40-2 on Monday, December 17, 2007 10:54 PM
 al-in-chgo wrote:
Which leaves the question(s):  but what of Family Lines (SCL, Clinchfield, L&N)?  - al 

 



Chessie's behind the scenes veiwpoint was "who cares" about them. The formation of CSX was just a power play by Watkins for the C&O/B&O to increase its size and power. No different when they went after Conrail. It was a power play to get the old NYC lines, something the C&O wanted as far back as the 1960's.

Modern day CSX is just a continuation of the C&O/B&O management philosophy from the past 40 years. They are driven, unyielding hardliners with lots of political connections. Not the type of company you want to be on the wrong side of an argument with.
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Vicksburg, Michigan
  • 2,303 posts
Posted by Andrew Falconer on Thursday, December 20, 2007 11:29 PM

Central Soya freight cars had the reporting marks of CSX, so why not try something else as the company name?

Andrew

Andrew

Watch my videos on-line at https://www.youtube.com/user/AndrewNeilFalconer

  • Member since
    July 2007
  • From: Austin,TX
  • 537 posts
Posted by chefjavier on Friday, December 21, 2007 7:57 AM
CHESSIE SYSTEMSSign - Dots [#dots]
Javier
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, December 21, 2007 11:09 AM

I guess in the two railroad world I live in, I'd have to choose the CSX paint scheme over NS black and white.  And I am old fashioned enough to wish they would bring the Cat back, too- but as a railroad exec told me, "paint don't pay the bills".

Anyway, the explanations I have heard about the CSXT marks all seem to be pretty much in agreement about how the name got stuck on the railroad.  I think that when you see X on the end of reporting marks, it indicates one of two things:

1) Common use.  TTX is a holding company owned by all the railroads which administers trailer on flat car or container traffic, usually in the form of multiple body units.

2) Private owners.  I've seen ADMX tank cars routinely spotted in Phoenix, Arizona, delivering megatonnage of corn oil.  ADM is Archer-Daniels-Midland, the agriculture giant.  Here near the Home of Army Infantry, Fort Benning, I also see cars marked DODX- US government box cars with the Department of Defense.  Not exactly a private owner, but close enough.

Hope that's accurate.

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Friday, December 21, 2007 5:29 PM
 erikthered wrote:

I guess in the two railroad world I live in, I'd have to choose the CSX paint scheme over NS black and white.  And I am old fashioned enough to wish they would bring the Cat back, too- but as a railroad exec told me, "paint don't pay the bills".

Anyway, the explanations I have heard about the CSXT marks all seem to be pretty much in agreement about how the name got stuck on the railroad.  I think that when you see X on the end of reporting marks, it indicates one of two things:

1) Common use.  TTX is a holding company owned by all the railroads which administers trailer on flat car or container traffic, usually in the form of multiple body units.

2) Private owners.  I've seen ADMX tank cars routinely spotted in Phoenix, Arizona, delivering megatonnage of corn oil.  ADM is Archer-Daniels-Midland, the agriculture giant.  Here near the Home of Army Infantry, Fort Benning, I also see cars marked DODX- US government box cars with the Department of Defense.  Not exactly a private owner, but close enough.

Hope that's accurate.

 

Are you sure about point 1)?  My understanding is that at least some of the "TTX genre" of leased rolling stock belongs to privately-held corporations.  In that case there would be no stock to sell to the public; it's a closed corp.  Possibly the RR co's participate in other ways:  bonds, advice, but not as far as I know.  - a. s.

 

al-in-chgo
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, December 21, 2007 8:01 PM

Nope, I am not sure, but I seem to recall reading in TRAINS that TTX was formed- and owned- by the railroads to ease management of freight cars, in this case, flatcars.

Based on what I've seen on inspection, though, you might very well be right- there are a lot of freight cars I have seen (and locomotives, too) with X reporting marks that have bank plates on them- as in "this car is financed by some bank".

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy