Trains.com

Big Boy Running As God And Otto Jabelmann Intended

6040 views
32 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Big Boy Running As God And Otto Jabelmann Intended
Posted by kgbw49 on Sunday, May 26, 2024 4:02 PM
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Sunday, May 26, 2024 5:11 PM

Independent PTC.  UP has published some pictures and discussed some aspects of the system.

2816 has independent PTC, something their steam crew is very proud of.  So proud that they don't want to discuss any technical details at all, and keep it 'proprietary' (one member of the crew said that since they put 2 and a half years of work into it, they're not just giving the 'secrets' away.)

U understand 2926 is to have independent PTC (not dependent on a link to equipment in a diesel or support car) and would appreciate seeing whatever approach they have implemented.

What this calls for, in my not-so-humble opinion, is a Firecrown-supported technical article in the new Trains, going into detail about what is required to implement 'correct' PTC on a steam locomotive and how the different railroads that are doing it met the challenges.

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Sunday, May 26, 2024 5:37 PM

And for old time's sake, here is pre-PTC Challenger 3985 including some rare mileage at track speed on that mighty good road to St. Paul, MN in 2008.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FvceYdAEetI&pp=QAFIAQ%3D%3D

  • Member since
    July 2016
  • 2,631 posts
Posted by Backshop on Monday, June 3, 2024 4:41 PM

Overmod

What this calls for, in my not-so-humble opinion, is a Firecrown-supported technical article in the new Trains, going into detail about what is required to implement 'correct' PTC on a steam locomotive and how the different railroads that are doing it met the challenges.

That would interest maybe 2% of the readership.

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Thursday, June 6, 2024 2:00 AM

Here is a 15-inch gauge 4-12-2 "almost" Union Pacific type that is under construction at Merrick Locomotive Works in WI.

First one is a running gear test.

Second one is near completion.

You will note left-side-mounted air pumps, two cylinders and rectangular tender with six-wheeled-trucks as differences to the 9000s.

 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MUiF0WHnl_U&pp=ygUUMTUgaW5jaCBnYXVnZSA0LTEyLTI%3D

 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PcI5UcW1T0k&pp=ygUTd2hpc2t5IHJpdmVyIDQtMTItMg%3D%3D

 

 

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Thursday, June 6, 2024 7:36 PM

Here is Big Boy 4014 in the 1950s in regular operation:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cK1hiEkDGog

 

 

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Saturday, June 8, 2024 4:47 PM
  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Thursday, June 13, 2024 11:42 AM

Here is an all-color snippet of UP steam on the Kansas Division in the 1950s including a 9000 Union Pacific, several 3800 Challengers, FEF Northerns, a 7000 Mountain and a 3200 Pacific really making time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfNGCrqPTsU

 

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Saturday, June 15, 2024 9:33 AM
  • Member since
    July 2010
  • From: Louisiana
  • 2,310 posts
Posted by Paul of Covington on Monday, June 17, 2024 1:10 AM

kgbw49

   Thanks, kgbw49.   I don't think I had ever heard a three-cylinder locomotive running before.  Weird.

_____________ 

  "A stranger's just a friend you ain't met yet." --- Dave Gardner

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Monday, June 17, 2024 7:44 PM

Anyone else note 844 on the board?

E7B assigned to the stock train?

Boxpok outside main?

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Sunday, June 30, 2024 9:15 PM

4014 Highball!

(~six minutes of pacing in Wyoming - 2023)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KlU745GzUQ

 

 

 

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Monday, July 1, 2024 9:42 PM
  • Member since
    September 2014
  • 134 posts
Posted by JC UPTON on Tuesday, July 2, 2024 8:18 AM

Please remind us of the various functions the "support diesel" provides, beyond PTC, and if intermittent or continous. 

Is it possible to run without ANY "support diesel"?

from the Far East of the Sunset Route

(In the shadow of the Huey P Long bridge)

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, July 2, 2024 9:21 AM

JC UPTON
Please remind us of the various functions the "support diesel" provides, beyond PTC, and if intermittent or continous. 

Is it possible to run without ANY "support diesel"?

Anything is 'possible', however possible and UP protocol are likely two very different things.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2019
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 9,728 posts
Posted by Flintlock76 on Tuesday, July 2, 2024 10:31 AM

JC UPTON

Please remind us of the various functions the "support diesel" provides, beyond PTC, and if intermittent or continous. 

Is it possible to run without ANY "support diesel"?

 

Ah yes, what former poster Juniatha used to call the "Panic Diesel."

Steve Lee explained it years ago.  Since the UP is an active railroad and not a "tourist line" for lack of a better term the lines have to be kept fluid and active as the shippers always come first.  The diesel's there as a back up to keep the train moving just in case the steam locomotive fails. 

In fact though the reverse was true on one occasion, the diesel failed, as in failed to shut down, and pushed 844 down the tracks causing flat spots on 844's drivers!  

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Tuesday, July 2, 2024 7:36 PM

If you notice from the June 30, 2024 pictures there is no support diesel.

UP's installation of PTC on 4014 apparently has worked to satisfaction.

https://www.railpictures.net/photo/860808/

https://www.railpictures.net/photo/860807/

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Rhododendron, OR
  • 1,516 posts
Posted by challenger3980 on Wednesday, July 3, 2024 1:19 AM

JC UPTON

Please remind us of the various functions the "support diesel" provides, beyond PTC, and if intermittent or continous. 

Is it possible to run without ANY "support diesel"?

 

Tis' Nice to see Steam running as intended,

I believe that another much appreciated, if not necessary benefit, is Dynamic Braking 

 

Doug

May your flanges always stay BETWEEN the rails

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Wednesday, July 3, 2024 8:34 AM

JC UPTON
Please remind us of the various functions the "support diesel" provides, beyond PTC, and if intermittent or continuous. 

Is it possible to run without ANY "support diesel"?

The whole point of the independent-PTC efforts (as on 4014 and 2816) is to allow them to run without ANY "support diesel".

As Doug just mentioned, while the diesel does give rapid and immediate 'limp-home' capability for a range of road failures -- although, perhaps important to note, not all -- the single most useful thing it can provide is not enhanced tractive effort but dynamic braking.

As was discovered on GG1s operated with Amfleet equipment, if the locomotive is very heavy, the amount of required train braking force can become great at times, particularly from high speed, but the independent brake on a steam locomotive is a relatively crappy and potentially very expensive way to provide that.  I remember for example that when 3751 was restored, it had to be tested with a substantial rack of skeleton flats to provide sufficient braking 'wheels and shoes' to be safe.  Now, if that can be done proportionally, and fully graduated, without any need for friction braking... which is something dynamic braking provides, on modern locomitives right down to almost zero mph road speed, you have an advantage.

Another is drifting control.  Most steam locomotives have to have careful handling when drifting at speed (this was one purpose of the Wagner bypass valves, as on ATSF 2926, and technically for the Trofimov valves on some Chinese steam) and there are advantages in being able to work for example ~15-20psi positive steam pressure in the engine to prevent vacuum effects or the usual problems with allowing atmosphere into the cylinder space via snifter valves.  

If there is any sort of developing issue with water, or with coal or oil quality, having diesel power to be able to 'stretch' water rate while retaining steam working for lubrication and low thermal distortion can be significant.

I can think of any number of excursions that ran late, late, late due to various issues with steam.  (One very painful one with 2102 and misconceived 'in-flight refueling' was just discussed on RyPN a few days ago).  If you have the ability to 'cut and run' with the excursion consist and all the passengers, there will be fewer issues with surly people driving home in the wee hours...

I would note in passing that the same issue that concerns 5550 (but not 4014 or 2816) is that if the operator isn't formally affiliated with a deep-pockets class 1 that actively provides all the expensive PTC components and maintenance 'free', there remains great advantage in 'remoting' signals from the necessarily-positioned antennae and sensors to a fully-equipped locomotive somewhere in the trailing consist.

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Wednesday, July 3, 2024 9:14 AM

It is nice to see 5 clean boxcars, 7 clean grain hopper cars, and the Steam Program caboose in the consist, all to help with the braking as Overmod points out, but also making it a great-looking train!

Good stuff from UP!

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Wednesday, July 3, 2024 6:56 PM

In Evanston WY on July 3.

  • Member since
    July 2024
  • 1 posts
Posted by Big Caboose on Wednesday, July 10, 2024 8:54 AM

I have read on the interweb that, on 7/11, 4014 will roll through a segment of North Sacramento on its way to Roseville. I found a nice spot to watch it - it has the Sacramento skyline in the background, it's well away from the track, and the train will be going slow through the area because it's a wye (it's at the end of 20th St)

The only possible issue is that once you are off the road you are on UP property. The UP property around the wye is large (understandably).

We would be about 50-feet from the track, but still on UP property. How serious is UP about keeping observers off its property? 

Tags: 4014
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, July 10, 2024 1:45 PM

Big Caboose
I have read on the interweb that, on 7/11, 4014 will roll through a segment of North Sacramento on its way to Roseville. I found a nice spot to watch it - it has the Sacramento skyline in the background, it's well away from the track, and the train will be going slow through the area because it's a wye (it's at the end of 20th St)

The only possible issue is that once you are off the road you are on UP property. The UP property around the wye is large (understandably).

We would be about 50-feet from the track, but still on UP property. How serious is UP about keeping observers off its property? 

If you try it you can find out.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, July 15, 2024 9:06 PM

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Tuesday, July 16, 2024 8:03 AM

BaltACD
How much water is being hauled in the two canteens along with the normal tender?

I don't have time to check, but the UP Steam site might have actual capacity as converted.

These were gas-turbine fuel tenders, so a quick check of their 'historic' fuel-oil capacity would get you at least in the ballpark.

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Tuesday, July 16, 2024 5:04 PM

If this web site is correct the auxiliary tenders have 28,000-gallon capacity.

https://utahrails.net/pass/water-cars.php

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Sunday, July 21, 2024 7:15 PM

Great film from the Feather River Canyon:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SsuDoquRTYI

 

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Sunday, July 21, 2024 11:25 PM

Wonder if UP ran a geometry car over the route shortly before 4014 ran?

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy