Trains.com

Purpose Of Car In Transcon Construction

4625 views
16 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2010
  • From: Louisiana
  • 2,310 posts
Purpose Of Car In Transcon Construction
Posted by Paul of Covington on Thursday, April 4, 2019 2:45 PM

    In the May issue of TRAINS magazine on page 54 there is a picture of Jupiter with what appears to be a special-purpose car behind it.  It looks like a standard flatcar with a container on it, but there seems to be a bunch of bracing at the ends and sides.  Does anyone know anything about it?

_____________ 

  "A stranger's just a friend you ain't met yet." --- Dave Gardner

  • Member since
    January 2019
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 9,728 posts
Posted by Flintlock76 on Thursday, April 4, 2019 3:21 PM

You know, I think it's a water tank car.  Solid construction with a hatch on the top, that'd be my guess.   There were places along the line where water was in short supply, at least at first.

  • Member since
    July 2010
  • From: Louisiana
  • 2,310 posts
Posted by Paul of Covington on Thursday, April 4, 2019 10:02 PM

   Thanks, Flintlock.   The more I think about it, the more your answer makes sense.  It appears to be built like an inside-out wooden boat, with the ribs on the outside.   There is a picture of a water car on page 36 which has big round casks on a flatcar, but there is no reason they couldn't have used both types.

_____________ 

  "A stranger's just a friend you ain't met yet." --- Dave Gardner

  • Member since
    January 2019
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 9,728 posts
Posted by Flintlock76 on Thursday, April 4, 2019 10:29 PM

Your welcome Paul!  You know, at first glance I thought it looked a bit like a modern-day "less than carload" container car!  (Couldn't be, could it?)  Then I looked more closely and came to the conclusion I did.

When you think about it, a box-like tank car would have been the easiest type to build, not requiring the cooperage skills a cylindrical tank car would have needed.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Friday, April 5, 2019 2:58 PM

I don't think it's a water car, it appears to be a flatcar with some external bracing with a long rectagular box with bracing securing it. More likely a load on a flatcar; that's how it looks to me anyway.

Stix
  • Member since
    January 2019
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 9,728 posts
Posted by Flintlock76 on Friday, April 5, 2019 3:48 PM

Anything's possible.  Hopefully someone will answer the thread who really knows, but right now it's anyone's guess.

  • Member since
    November 2014
  • 250 posts
Posted by ORNHOO on Saturday, April 6, 2019 12:47 PM
Is it the same car that is identified as a "water car" in the caption to the photo on page 58?
  • Member since
    January 2019
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 9,728 posts
Posted by Flintlock76 on Saturday, April 6, 2019 1:37 PM

Could be.  The photo quality's not that great though so it's hard to tell.  The car pictured on page 54 looks a bit shorter than the one on 58.  

At any rate it shows there's nothing new about "canteen" cars.

  • Member since
    July 2010
  • From: Louisiana
  • 2,310 posts
Posted by Paul of Covington on Saturday, April 6, 2019 8:24 PM

   Hey, I think ORNHOO is on to something.  In that picture on page 58 you can just barely make out the angled bracing (inverted V) on the side, and the height relative to the tender is about right.  I had been wondering why that bracing was there, but it occurs to me now that diagonal bracing might be necessary because of the weight of the water sloshing fore-and-aft.  It does look unnecessarily massive to me, but I think they knew more what they were doing than I do.

_____________ 

  "A stranger's just a friend you ain't met yet." --- Dave Gardner

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Calgary
  • 2,047 posts
Posted by cx500 on Saturday, April 6, 2019 11:09 PM

My copy has yet to appear in the mailbox, so this is speculation.  Steel tenders had interior baffles to moderate the sloshing, either rivetted or welded to the sides.  It would definitely be much harder to achieve similar strength and longevity with wood.  Hence it would seem logical to add the strength on the outside.

  • Member since
    January 2019
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 9,728 posts
Posted by Flintlock76 on Sunday, April 7, 2019 8:17 AM

Nothing wrong with following the old medieval cathedral builder's rule...

"Brethren, if thou art not sure, build hem stronger!"

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Wednesday, April 24, 2019 10:33 AM

I have not seen the picture, but it occurs to me that a recent comment in Dave Klepper's South Brooklyn switching thread might be relevant here.

Coal supply to 'intermediate points' on some of the subway lines were done from special low-sided cars, as the transfer method (to heating stoves) was via comparatively-small but frequent bucketloads.  A specific note is that a typical hopper car would have been ill-suited for this purpose.

Having said that, I do think water (and probably 'potable water') is the likeliest explanation for the reported construction.

NDG
  • Member since
    December 2013
  • 1,620 posts
Posted by NDG on Friday, April 26, 2019 12:33 PM
  • Member since
    January 2019
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 9,728 posts
Posted by Flintlock76 on Friday, April 26, 2019 5:07 PM

Interesting.  At least we know where the picture was taken.

"Locomotive 'Jupiter' at Monument Point."

Unfortunately it doesn't say what kind of car it is, but I'm still guessing it's a home-built water tank car.

Thanks NDG!

NDG
  • Member since
    December 2013
  • 1,620 posts
Posted by NDG on Friday, April 26, 2019 5:46 PM

Flintlock76

Interesting.  At least we know where the picture was taken.

"Locomotive 'Jupiter' at Monument Point."

Unfortunately it doesn't say what kind of car it is, but I'm still guessing it's a home-built water tank car.

Thanks NDG!

 

 

 

I KNOW it's a G Damn WATER CAR! It's not likely full of chocolate syrup! Would clog the Check Valves! and burn the sheet!

I have seen cars such as this in old CPR construction photographs and that what they were.

I have mailed three 3 Condolence cards out since April 1st., TWO to same address!! First a Son and yesterday, the Father.

Bad Time rite now.

Great Site on Promontory.

I was there years ago in a snow storm and have never felt so far away and alone as I did there. What a place for a Railroad in the ' 60s!!.

Great location for the Rocket Booster site.

Would have been something to watch SP highball tonnage over THAT route BEFORE the Lucin Cut Off.

Amazing!

Thank You.

 

 

  • Member since
    January 2019
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 9,728 posts
Posted by Flintlock76 on Friday, April 26, 2019 6:53 PM

I know you know, just sayin', that's all.

My condolances on the loss of your friends, can't be easy.

  • Member since
    July 2010
  • From: Louisiana
  • 2,310 posts
Posted by Paul of Covington on Friday, April 26, 2019 10:34 PM

   Thanks, NDG, for the positive ID, and may I add my condolences on your loss.

   From what you say that type of water car was a more or less standard design, and not something conjured up just by the WP crews.   And I'm going to have to spend more time going through that site.

_____________ 

  "A stranger's just a friend you ain't met yet." --- Dave Gardner

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy