Trains.com

Top 5 8-Coupled Articulateds

6533 views
17 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2018
  • 49 posts
Posted by ShroomZed on Thursday, August 15, 2019 4:21 PM

If we're talking about garratts, then the South African Railways class GL of 1929 has to be mentioned.

These were the most powerful garratts ever built with a tractive effort of 89,000 lbf. They originally hauled 1000 tonne trains up 1 in 66 gradients and 2000 tonne trains downhill, before electrification in 1938 transferred them to pulling 1200 tonne trains up 1 in 50 gradients. A truly remarkable feat for any loco, far eclipsing anything ever run in Europe. 

Image result for SAR class GL

The AD60 garratts were actually not that big nor powerful as far as garratts go. Their tractive effort was only 59,000 (later 63,000) lbf which was less than all later South African garratts besides the branch-line GO of 1954. The Algerian Railways BT, Rhodesian Railways 20th class, East African Railways class 59, Bengal Nagpur Railway class N, NM, and P were all also much more powerful. 

The physically largest garratt ever built was the sole Soviet Ya.01 class of 1932. It had a tractive effort rivalling the GL of 89,000 lbf. It was 17 feet tall and the boiler (7ft 6in wide, same diameter as EAR 59) was so large it had to be transported by truck. It was designed to run in extremely cold conditions, but was retired only 5 years into service as the Soviets were unfamiliar with Garratt technology. 

Image result for soviet ya.01 garratt

There were plans to build a 61 class for the East African Railways, which would have had a boiler 8 ft 6 in wide and a tractive effort of 115,000 lbf, which would have certainly have been the largest garratt and the largest locomotive to ever have run on a narrow gauge. Was never built as it was decided impractical, especially with diesels on the horizon. 

--- 

Back to United States articulateds, I think the Great Northern R-2 deserves to be mentioned. Truly massive things with original tractive effort of 146,000 lbf, 63-inch drivers and grate area of 126 sq ft. Quite an appearence too with the air-compressor smokebox front. I rarely see these mentioned when it comes to great articulateds. 

I'm also fond of the Great Northern's rebuilt 2-8-8-0 2000 class of 1940. They were an extremely extensive rebuild, rendering the locos unrecognizable from their original selves, with new nickel-steel boilers, roller bearings, and integrally cast frames. A testament of the GN's skill at rebuilding power and giving it a new lease of life. Almost certainly the largest 2-8-8-0s in existence. 

Image result for great northern n2 2-8-8-0

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Monday, August 20, 2018 6:10 AM

kgbw49

This is a great video - double-headed AD60s - just 1 minute 35 seconds

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=O22dS7JbAHQ

And another heading up Fassifern Bank - about 4 minutes

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-1EWpCQP7eE

 

 

I guess it wouldn't surprise anyone to know that I had been to Fassifern in that era, and photographed the double headed Garratts there, only still photos of course and mainly B&W. I remember one occasion in 1970 when I did have colour film, because Pacific 3822 was expected to haul the "Newcastle Flyer" after some time out of service for repairs, that nobody really expected to be completed. But to our relief, it appeared heading south as a "light engine" and returned on the "Flyer" as advised. we spent about half a day on a rocky outcrop north of the road bridge seen in some of the videos.

However, I also met the man who took the movies, Philip Belbin in August 1962 photographing trains on a rural branch on the southern edge of Sydney from Campbeltown to Camden. Phil gave me a lift to follow the train, but I had used the last frame of 35mm on the first shot of the branchline train. His eldest son is a magazine editor which I regularly contribute to, and is a close friend. But all wasn't lost. The photo I took with that last frame is the best I ever took of that line, and I have a 10" x 12" enlargement handy. I should scan that some day...

Peter

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Saturday, August 11, 2018 9:24 PM

Powerful imagery all right.  Makes me feel like I'm on the Bismarck and King George V and Rodney are coming to get me!  British steel at it's most awesome!

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 6,199 posts
Posted by Miningman on Saturday, August 11, 2018 10:21 AM

Powerful imagery. 

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Saturday, August 11, 2018 7:59 AM

This is a great video - double-headed AD60s - just 1 minute 35 seconds

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=O22dS7JbAHQ

And another heading up Fassifern Bank - about 4 minutes

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-1EWpCQP7eE

 

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Friday, August 10, 2018 10:52 PM

 Geeeeezzz... Huh?  Even Broadway Limited Imports knew better'n to articulate their HO scale T1.

 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Friday, August 10, 2018 7:32 PM

Penny Trains
PRR T1 because who besides the Pennsy would try to streamline an articulated?

Hey, THAT'S NOT FAIR.  And you know better about the 'real thing' being articulated, even though some of the models kinda are...

And not even true: a perfectly good counter-example already having been mentioned here: the AC-12s were streamlined by most definitions that could be applied to nominally much "faster" steam power...

(What you need for full comic effect here is to put up a picture of a lash-up of TWO T1s here, which is an 'eight-coupled articulated' just as a brace of K4s is equivalent to a very fast 4-6-6-4...)

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • From: Parma Heights Ohio
  • 3,442 posts
Posted by Penny Trains on Friday, August 10, 2018 6:52 PM

N&W Y6b because they were perfectly designed for the task they were most often assigned to: mineral service on heavy grades.

N&W Z1b simply because I like the look of them and maybe also because they were workhorses that didn't get much glory.  And where else besides on the N&W could you find big articulateds in yard and hump service.

UP Big Boy because as with N&W's Y classes they were designed to do a specific job and they did it admirably.

C&O H-8 2-6-6-6 because I like 'em.

PRR T1 because who besides the Pennsy would try to streamline an articulated?  Laugh

Trains, trains, wonderful trains.  The more you get, the more you toot!  Big Smile

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Friday, August 10, 2018 6:54 AM

I would agree with Peter and put up a Garratt for consideration, specifically NSWGR AD60 class 4-8-4+4-8-4's.  I believe that these were the largest Garratts ever built and provided big power for relatively light rail.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 94 posts
Posted by sgriggs on Friday, August 10, 2018 5:25 AM

kgbw49

The SP AC units were also consistently used on passenger runs as primary power for passenger schedules at several locations around the SP system, if I recall correctly.

 

 

I’ve seen photos of cab forwards hauling long strings of heavyweights over rugged parts of the SP.

 

Scott

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Friday, August 10, 2018 3:35 AM

The SP AC units were also consistently used on passenger runs as primary power for passenger schedules at several locations around the SP system, if I recall correctly.

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • 6 posts
Posted by steamhogger on Thursday, August 9, 2018 7:55 PM
I agree that the B&O EM-1 was one of the finest ever. I got to ride one on the why in Painesville Ohio in middle fifties,
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 94 posts
Posted by sgriggs on Thursday, August 9, 2018 7:17 PM

sgriggs

I'll throw this out:

 

Union Pacific 4000 class 4-8-8-4

 

Norfolk & Western Y6b 2-8-8-2

 

Duluth Missabe & Iron Range M-3 2-8-8-4

 

Baltimore & Ohio EM-1 2-8-8-4

 

Southern Pacific AC-12 4-8-8-2

 

Scott Griggs

Louisville, KY 

 

Here is some rationale for my list:

 

UP 4000 - Largest, heaviest (yes I know what Huddleston wrote and I think he was reaching), arguably most capable high speed super power articulated.

N&W Y6b - Masterpiece of evolutionary design.  Easily the highest thermodynamic efficiency of any modern articulated.  Best design for hauling dead freight up steep grades.

DM&IR M3 - Excellent modern and versatile heavy duty freight locomotives.  D&RGW leased some M4’s for use over the Tennessee Pass in the 1940's and raved about them.

B&O EM-1 - Another excellent late steam design that did everything the B&O wanted.  Although on the small side, the EM-1’s were easily among the finest articulateds operating in the Eastern U.S.

SP AC-12 - Very versatile big power used all over the SP, including through the tunnels and snow sheds of the Sierra Nevada.  The AC-12’s were the newest cab forwards in the SP’s large fleet.

 

Scott

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Thursday, August 9, 2018 11:26 AM

But....WHY??????   WHY?????  They looked purdier than the other contenders?  They rode better between the speeds of 30 and 50 mph?  Their whistles were cooler?

Please flesh this out with a little carne.

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 94 posts
Posted by sgriggs on Thursday, August 9, 2018 9:21 AM

I'll throw this out:

 

Union Pacific 4000 class 4-8-8-4

 

Norfolk & Western Y6b 2-8-8-2

 

Duluth Missabe & Iron Range M-3 2-8-8-4

 

Baltimore & Ohio EM-1 2-8-8-4

 

Southern Pacific AC-12 4-8-8-2

 

Scott Griggs

Louisville, KY

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, August 9, 2018 8:27 AM

B&O's EM-1's  shown tripleheading a coal train up Chardon Hill inroute to Painesville.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Thursday, August 9, 2018 12:41 AM

Surely Beyer Garratts count....

The NSWGR AD60 comes to mind.

The South African GMAM must be up there along with the East African 59th class.

Peter

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Top 5 8-Coupled Articulateds
Posted by kgbw49 on Wednesday, August 8, 2018 9:26 PM

Taking the cue from Dave Klepper in the Top 5 4-8-4 Discussion Topic, what are your Top 5 8-coupled articulated locomotives?

Compound or simple, any combination of lead truck, trailing truck or no trailing truck.

Here is a list to get things started:

Norfolk & Western Y6b 2-8-8-2 - compound articulated black diamond hauler mountain mauler extraordinaire with a shot of simple steam on the side

Great Northern R-2 2-8-8-2 - simple articulated fast freight speed with maximum tractive effort for the Rockies

Great Northern N-3 2-8-8-0 - simple articulated Swiss Army knife - iron ore hauler, grain hauler, merchandise hauler, troop train hauler

D&RGW R1 L-132 2-8-8-2 - High altitude heavy hauler

DM&IR M-3 2-8-8-4 - Iron ore hauler of 15,000 tons decades before UP-BNSF coal trains of that size 

 

 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy