Trains.com

D&RGW Monarch Branch

4709 views
3 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Monday, August 15, 2016 11:35 AM

Monarch Branch 1881-83 to 1985....Never got past the "letter" stage (Usual suspects, non-railroaders) and then there is the ownership issue (CF&I) west of Maysville.

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,449 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Sunday, August 14, 2016 9:05 PM

CSSHEGEWISCH

It was always a difficult operation on either gauge or with steam or diesels.  The steep grades and double switchback would severely limit train capacities.  It's also a long way from anywhere, which would make it difficult to attract customers.

 

The switchbacks had a capacity of 16 GS gondolas plus engines.  The steep grade at the upper end is similar to the C&TS.  The line is much closer to Denver and Colorado Springs than the C&TS, D&SNG, and the Rio Grande Scenic.  The central Colorado mountains are full of summer tourists looking for new things to do, think Vail, etc.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Sunday, August 14, 2016 6:46 AM

It was always a difficult operation on either gauge or with steam or diesels.  The steep grades and double switchback would severely limit train capacities.  It's also a long way from anywhere, which would make it difficult to attract customers.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,449 posts
D&RGW Monarch Branch
Posted by MidlandMike on Saturday, August 13, 2016 8:49 PM

Rio Grande's Monarch branch in Colorado was a mountain operation that had everything: double loops, double switchbacks, and 4% grades.  It was abandoned in the early 1980s.  The question is, was it ever considered for a tourist line?

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy