Trains.com

Pacific 231

10641 views
66 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 1,866 posts
Posted by Leo_Ames on Thursday, October 15, 2015 8:15 PM

54light15
I may be hazy with the details, but why would he B.S. me?

Yeah, I agree.

That's why I tend to think that if you're remembering it correctly, he probably just simplified the story a bit. After all, the interesting bit is that he was supposed to be aboard but happily wasn't.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Thursday, October 15, 2015 12:01 PM

Since ships have been introduced as a topic now and in the past and this forum does deal with preservation.......

https://ussconstitutionmuseum.org/restoration/blog/current-work/

 

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    December 2008
  • From: Toronto, Canada
  • 2,554 posts
Posted by 54light15 on Thursday, October 15, 2015 8:55 AM

Well, he did tell me about the Morro Castle 43 years ago. I may be hazy with the details, but why would he B.S. me? In another 3rd hand brush with nautical disaster, I had a girlfriend back then and her father said he was on the Queen Mary when it cut its escort ship in half. Felt a slight tremor, but didn't even slow down, he said.

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 1,866 posts
Posted by Leo_Ames on Wednesday, October 14, 2015 8:21 PM

Wonder if he really was supposed to sail on her that voyage.

As I recall, she left Havana for somewhere in the Northeast and was at sea for days when disaster struck off New Jersey.

Perhaps he simplified it for dramatic effect, having missed the initial voyage to Havana.

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,644 posts
Posted by Wizlish on Saturday, October 10, 2015 1:38 PM

54light15
Guetem- Is there a link to that?

I posted one yesterday but it seems to have been removed.  If you google "Hustler Champion of Champions" (the latter being the name of the particular aircraft) you will  see multiple versions immediately.

  • Member since
    December 2008
  • From: Toronto, Canada
  • 2,554 posts
Posted by 54light15 on Saturday, October 10, 2015 9:49 AM

Guetem- Is there a link to that? I grew up on Long Island and was well within the smell of salt water myself. I was painting a guys house when I was a kid and showed up late one day. The owner said not to worry about it. When he was a kid he was supposed to be signing on to a merchant ship. His mother didn't wake him as it was around 3 am. Later in the day he found out that the ship, the Morro Castle caught on fire and washed ashore in Asbury Park. He said that ever since he never got upset about lateness.

  • Member since
    March 2012
  • 116 posts
Posted by guetem1 on Saturday, October 10, 2015 12:44 AM
there's also an outstanding documentary on B-58's with BG Stewart
  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Friday, October 9, 2015 8:24 PM

The subsitute "Phoenix" after the crash was a North American O-47, a pot-bellied observation aircraft from the World War Two era.  At the time it was the only flying O-47 in the world.  It was dressed up to resemble the profile of the tail boom of the C-82.

Since North American also built the P-51 this could be where the confusion comes from about a P-51 being in "Flight Of The Phoenix."

And I'm with Dr. D on this one, no computer-generated movie planes for this kid! If there's no real airplanes in the movie don't bother me with it!

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Friday, October 9, 2015 7:30 PM

Well, I guess I'm the first triple threat to report.  Flanged wheels got me first - at the age of five months, with a Lionel train for Christmas.  (Real tinplate, with flat hook and slot couplers.)

Then there were the aircraft.  I was living under the airspace that the Grumman Iron Works used to test Hellcats.  If a diving Stuka was more frightening than the full throttle scream of a diving Hellcat it must have been very scary indeed.

Of course, all of that time I was living within smelling distance of salt water - New York Harbor, at that time one of the busiest ports in the world.  I remember seeing the capsized Normandie at its midtown pier - and what was left of USS Franklin as she steamed under the Brooklyn Bridge en route to the Navy Yard for repairs.

Ships got the first crack at me - Merchant Marine cadet.  A summer steaming around the Atlantic, trying to hold a tired WWII hospital ship together, pretty much wore out that idea's welcome.  Being within a few hundred miles of the Andrea Doria/Stockholm collision sealed the negatives.

So I spent 26 years bending wrenches, running paperwork and finally processing statistics on a wide spectrum of USAF flying machines (and some that were oversize artillery shells.)  Once I brushed the flight line dust off my shoes I vowed, "Never again."  So now I live about six miles from Nellis AFB and have high performance machinery cruising in for landings at all hours...

In the meantime, the railfan mourned the passing of steam - and then was sent to Japan, where the only thing not powered by an elephant-eared coalburner was the base supply spur (Motive power was a DD10 siderod center-cab provided by the US Army and taken over by the JNR at the end of the Occupation.)  I went back to Railfan Heaven twice, to have the final demise of steam (and the Kiso Forest Railway) cushioned by a bunch of brutally beautiful cat motors and some of the nicest-looking diesels in the world.  Diesel-hydraulics - diesel-electric power in Japan at that time consisted of some not too successful one-offs.

To return to the original subject, I always crack up when the classical music announcer reports that the next piece will be, "Pacific two thirty-one."  Not one in ten are aware that the digits stand for the wheel arrangement...

Chuck (Classical music lover, fan of anything that moves under its own power - even CPV Monolith, the starship that's a modified planet)

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • 755 posts
Posted by Juniatha on Friday, October 9, 2015 5:49 PM

Hm , so I followed the link and listened . Sorry , naw-naw-naw - not for me . The sound is way to barking , belting , more like a big old bike , some hint of trucking , too , not my preference for aircraft . Whre is the smoothness , the subtle reserve of power ?  Well , never mind - here's to you :

The Breitling Super Connie – restored aircraft – starts engines ,
 
flying over the Alps in the Breitling Super Connie

Although I certainly will say nothing against the way it was restored , the aircraft doesn’t quite display the engine sound as it was ( as far as I can say from what little I saw and heard of these radial engines ) its slightly on the hard side , somewhat rough with too much metal noise ( and I don’t even mention those squealing brakes ) and slightly too pronounced rhythm and somewhat too throaty exhaust at idling , then at full throttle it’s a bit belting ..  What I love is the smooth , subdued humming that holds the hint of a promise to continue timelessly and go on and on forever – while really it can’t of course as little as we ourselves could stay above the clouds forever  

restauration of a legend – learn some German as you watch - *gee* 
 
How it was when she was young :
 
15 hours Trans-Atlantic Hamburg to New York – a Lufthansa advertising film – of course no smoke from engines , whadda you think .  
or :
 
TWA flying L-1049 in 1956 ( the non turbo engined plane )

Caution , don’t watch either one if a hefty dose of sentimental sweetness should make you feel unwell , it’s fully drenched in Fifties style coverage .. and as I recognized at the first note the Lufthansa one with Martin Boettcher’s music , too – now that’s for me , I’m an admitting romantic , incurable ;  so , I can take it friends , and I like it like that *gee* !  

Juniatha

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,485 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Friday, October 9, 2015 1:54 PM

To those who actually read the book, they will know that the plane was originally something similar to a Fairchild C-82.  One of the tailbooms was salvaged to serve as the fuselage, along with one engine and enough of the wings, for the aircraft with which they flew from the crash site.  The first version of the movie is good but the book is much better.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    December 2008
  • From: Toronto, Canada
  • 2,554 posts
Posted by 54light15 on Friday, October 9, 2015 1:10 PM

I'm gonna have to watch Phoenix again to see a P-51. But, regarding "Jaws," how many sharks do you see? One! I highly recommend "Sharknado" 1 & 2 In those you see thousands! A shark killed by a bar stool! A shark killed by a pool cue! A shark hanging from the runner of a helicopter! In the 2nd one, the guy is body surfing a shark through the sky and I won't tell you where it lands. I guarantee, you don't want to have a mouthful of beer at that moment as someone will get a beer shower! These pictures are so unbelievable, they're incredible! Rent "Sharknado" buy beer and laugh your head off! Sharknado!!

  • Member since
    March 2013
  • 426 posts
Posted by Dr D on Friday, October 9, 2015 12:44 PM

NORTH AMERICAN P-51 MUSTANG -

I think one of the really cool things about the movie - "Flight of the Phoenix" is that the whole story hinges around the busted SKY TRUCK, and that Heinrick Dorfman can lead the whole group to rebuild it into a working rescue aircraft.  All the drama and eveyone's rescue depends on this fictional rebuilding of the SKY TRUCK wreck.

That they really did construct and fly such a reworked airplane as the "Tallmanz P-1" is truely remarkable, considering that in most films such a thing is never done, never constructed or that like today it is created fictionally as a computor generated cyber event.  

In the 1960's they did build such a real "movie plane" and they flew it with stunt pilots! - REMARKABLE! - UNBELIEVABLE! - OUTSTANDING!

In the film it would also appear that in the final scenes at the end of the film - the "rescue scenes at the oasis" - that a modified P-51 Mustang fighter was used as a substitute for then destroyed "Tallmanz P-1" rescue plane.

The Mustang P-51 of course was the premere combat fighter of WWII and undoubtedly this plane used was from the Tallmanz Aviation warbird movie inventory.

Just in case you wondered why the movie plane looked different at the end.

Doc

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Thursday, October 8, 2015 6:49 PM

And on books and movies, I'm reminded about something Mel Brooks said about "Frankenstein" the book, and "Frankenstein" the 1931 movie.

Mel said both were works of genius, the book because "who'd ever believe a 19 year old girl could write something like that?" and the movie was a work of genius, "because the book as written is impossible to make a decent film out of."

Oh yeah, "Jaws" the book.  Bored me.  "For cryin' out loud, WHEN is the shark gonna eat somebody?"

"Northwest Passage", the 1940 movie with Spencer Tracy is a LOT better than the book, trust me.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Thursday, October 8, 2015 7:58 AM

54light15

What a great movie that was! I recall lines around the block to get into the theatre for days when it played where I grew up. Pictures like that were an event, with banners, sidewalk signs and so forth. I watched it recently and was impressed once again by Ian Bannen's performance, and let's not forget Dan Duryea, one of my all- time champs. 

On You Tube is the film of the "Phoenix" crashing where Paul Mantz was killed. He was Amelia Earhart's ground crew chief by the way.

 

Great movie, with great acting (how can you go wrong with anything starring General Jimmy Stewart, who flew many B-24 bombing missions over Germany) pretty good script, fine directing.  

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    March 2013
  • 426 posts
Posted by Dr D on Thursday, October 8, 2015 2:48 AM

"Flight of the Phoenix" stunt flyer Paul Mantz was killed flying the "Phoenix plane" in the movie.  Film credits dedicate the movie to him.  He also crashed landed a B-17 bomber for the film "12 O'clock High."  Paul trained Amelia Earhart in long distance flying prior to her death in her world circle flight.

As an Army air Cadet in the 1920's he stunted his military plane by flying down the railroad tracks directly into the path of a speeding passenger steam locomotive.  The engineer raised a chorus on the whistle while Paul pulled the plane up before collision impact.  The passenger train was carrying millitary officers to the graduation of the cadet class Paul was to graduate with.  He was discharged for the incident.

In WW II Paul went in the service as an Army Air Corps Major in the First Motion Picture Unit (FMPU).  After the war he purchased 475 surplus military planes for use by Hollywood.  These were bombers and fighters - P51 Mustangs - that were used in many post WW II films about the war.  Paul joked he had the sixth largest air force in the world.  One of the P51C Mustangs he rebuilt into a race plane and was used in Bendix trophy racing for which he won the race during 3 consecutive seasons.

In 1961 Paul Mantz joined with Frank Tallmann to form Tallmanz Aviation providing  movie and TV stunt work for Hollywood.  The "Flight of the Phoenix" plane was classified as - Tallmanz Phoenix P-1 - and was to be piloted by Frank.  Frank had broken his leg in a freak accident and Paul stepped into the pilots role for the movie.  Frank was also killed in a movie stunt crash eight years later in 1973.   

Paul Mantz death at the controls of the "Flight of the Phoenix" Talmantz P-1 plane on July 8th, 1965 can be seen on u-tube the - plane hits ground on a low pass for the camera and the hull breaks right behind the wing.  Paul was 63 years old and had acquired a Hollywood movie fortune of $10M.  Toxicology tests in the desert enviornment indicate ethanol consumption, and that Paul had been drinking, however, the test may have been corrupted by decomposition due to lack of refrigeration of the body.  

Bobby Rose was standing in the cockpit behind Mantz and was playing the role of "Dorfman" and was seriously hurt.  Paul Mantz had been stunting for actor Jimmy Stewart playing the character "Frank Towns."  

The movie credits read -  "It should be rememered... that Paul Mantz, a fine man and brilliant flyer, gave his life in the making of this film..." 

Doc

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,644 posts
Posted by Wizlish on Wednesday, October 7, 2015 11:07 PM

Firelock76
Where's the control yokes? Is that pilot flying the 'Bus with a laptop?

I thought it was common knowledge that those airplanes have sidesticks, like fighters.

I greatly enjoyed the music-lovers' tie-in to the original thread topic, the invocation of Tannhauser ... although wasn't that business with the squirts, in that context, just a bit suggestive for a family-friendly forum?  (The 380 is big enough to BE the Venusberg...)

  • Member since
    December 2008
  • From: Toronto, Canada
  • 2,554 posts
Posted by 54light15 on Wednesday, October 7, 2015 6:39 PM

I believe that Frank Tallman flew the airplane through the hangar in the picture "It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World." He also wrangled the Mosquitos for "633 Squadron" and the B-25s for "Catch 22"

Yes, some books do complement each other and those are good examples. But just about any book by Stephen King is better as a movie, especially "Christine;" cripes that book just went on and on. King even admits that he runs on a bit. Another stinker was "Jaws." Remember in the book about how the mayor was in trouble with the mob, and Hooper was fooling around with Brody's wife? What did that have to do with the story which was about a big 'ol shark? I recently saw it again in a theatre and it sure holds up. Sure it's a mechanical shark but it still scared the hell out of me.

One book that was total dreck, something you read on an airplane or on the train to work but made my absolute favourite and one of the best movies of all time and that was "The Godfather"

Some books have never been made into movies and should have been like "The Barefoot Brigade" and "Elkhorn Tavern" by Douglas C. Jones, an amazing writer of the Civil War and thereafter.

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Wednesday, October 7, 2015 6:23 PM

Poor old Paul Mantz.  Quite the Hollywood stunt flyer exraordinare and co-founder of Tallmantz Aviation with the late Frank Tallmann, also a stunt flyer. 

So the "Flight Of The Phoeniz" movie is better than the book?  Wouldn't be the first time a movie was better than the book it was based on.  Doesn't happen very often.  Sometimes the movie and the book complement each other very well, like "The Great Escape" or "The Outlaw Josey Wales."

  • Member since
    December 2008
  • From: Toronto, Canada
  • 2,554 posts
Posted by 54light15 on Wednesday, October 7, 2015 12:59 PM

What a great movie that was! I recall lines around the block to get into the theatre for days when it played where I grew up. Pictures like that were an event, with banners, sidewalk signs and so forth. I watched it recently and was impressed once again by Ian Bannen's performance, and let's not forget Dan Duryea, one of my all- time champs. 

On You Tube is the film of the "Phoenix" crashing where Paul Mantz was killed. He was Amelia Earhart's ground crew chief by the way.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,485 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Wednesday, October 7, 2015 7:01 AM

Firelock76

Hi Juniatha!  Hey listen, that video of the Aibus cockpit scared the hell out of me!  Where's the control yokes?  Is that pilot flying the 'Bus with a laptop?  How do you "feel" the airplane with a laptop?  Jeez!  And just when I was getting used to airplanes without propellers!

You sound like Frank Towns, the pilot in "The Flight of the Phoenix".  He was an old seat-of-the-pants pilot who couldn't make the transition to jets and looked with disdain at flying on instruments.

The book reads well and the first movie with James Stewart as Frank Towns is the better version.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Tuesday, October 6, 2015 6:01 PM

Hi Juniatha!  Hey listen, that video of the Aibus cockpit scared the hell out of me!  Where's the control yokes?  Is that pilot flying the 'Bus with a laptop?  How do you "feel" the airplane with a laptop?  Jeez!  And just when I was getting used to airplanes without propellers!

On the other hand, I was impressed by that all-woman helicopter crew.  I'd fly with them anytime.  Matter of fact, the last time I was on a helicopter a young woman WAS flying it, and very well I might add.

Speaking of man-made things that defy God and fly, there's a thread called "Historic Warbirds" on the "General Discussion" side, page two.  We'd gotten to discussing those wild, wooly, spinning and spitting castor oil rotary engines when the thread, uh, "ran out of steam."

Does this put us back on topic? 

  • Member since
    December 2008
  • From: Toronto, Canada
  • 2,554 posts
Posted by 54light15 on Monday, October 5, 2015 7:40 PM

Alright, I started this thread and all due respect to you Juniatha, it's not hijacked at all, it's really about the sweet music made by the machine, whether train, car or aircraft. I love the sound made by the Avro Lancaster that flies over Toronto now and then. Four Packard-built Merlins in full chat is a sound to behold. I love the sound of my recently purchased two-stroke Saab, the chainsaw from hell. My friend's Citroen SM makes some mighty fine music as well.

I bought a book a few years ago, by Axel Zwingenberger, "Vom Zauber der Zuge, Eine Reise durch den Nacht in Bildern und Musik" and it includes a CD of his boogie-woogie piano playing and a CD of steam locomotives recorded at the end of standard-gauge steam in East Germany in about 1999. Music! It's all sweet music!

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Monday, October 5, 2015 4:17 PM

Ah yes J, Schlimm is from an old joke.  The Merlin engine does at least whistle, so that is tangentially related to steam engines.  

The LH Airbus 380 short doc was fine, though these days I fly Air Berlin Airbus 330s.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • 755 posts
Posted by Juniatha on Monday, October 5, 2015 2:25 PM

Schlimm ,

now , it's really schlimm ( ger for : bad ) with you .  

Thought this thread is about a music piece which again was composed to try and capture the spirit of steam , a 231 or Pacific type namely , obviously then the most impressive type around for the composer .  

I wanted to add some to the topic , thinking this was a site devoted to discussing railroad matter .

I see I'm wrong - at least on this hijacked thread .

Thanks for saving my time

= J =

uuh .. and Old Aunt June is not to be cut off so easily , here's my offer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfHl87p7X5o

sit back , relax and have a glass of something fine ..

.. or this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGult1u1DbE

 

 

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Monday, October 5, 2015 12:07 PM

The sounds of a Merlin-engined P-51.

https://youtu.be/h5fjKEXXPQ8

 

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Tuesday, September 1, 2015 4:09 PM

CSSHEGEWISCH

I've read that another aircraft with noise issues from propeller tips was the B-36.

Since both models were known for long-endurance missions, I'm curious as to how the crews of B-36's and Tu-95's dealt with the noise.

 

"On the B-36, the large, slow-turning propellers interacted with the high pressure air flow behind the wings to produce an easily recognizable very low frequency pulse at ground level that betrayed approaching flights."   Not clear if the flight crews also felt the pulse.

"The TU-95 has four Kuznetsov NK-12 engines, each driving contra-rotating propellers. It is the only propeller-powered strategic bomber still in operational use today. The tips of the propeller-blades move faster than the speed of sound, making it one of the noisiest military aircraft."  So a very different noise produced.

 

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,485 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Tuesday, September 1, 2015 7:30 AM

I've read that another aircraft with noise issues from propeller tips was the B-36.

Since both models were known for long-endurance missions, I'm curious as to how the crews of B-36's and Tu-95's dealt with the noise.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Monday, August 31, 2015 11:29 AM

The A400M has been plagued with teething problems, overweight, far over budget and thus many of the orders have been cut.  The purpose of counter rotating props is to reduce drag and increase lift, allowing its use on short, grass runways (in theory).

  • Tactical takeoff distance: 980 m (3,215 ft) (aircraft weight 100 tonnes, soft field, ISA, sea level)
  • Tactical landing distance: 770 m (2,526 ft) (as above)

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy