Trains.com

top 5 4-8-4s

22364 views
68 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: A State of Humidity
  • 2,441 posts
Posted by wallyworld on Monday, February 9, 2009 11:09 AM

 Looking at the results, seems to provide more than enough evidence that there is no consensus as well as criteria. This seems to indicate why a reproduction in a new locomotive like Tornado will never occur here.

Nothing is more fairly distributed than common sense: no one thinks he needs more of it than he already has.

  • Member since
    August 2001
  • From: US
  • 261 posts
Posted by JonathanS on Monday, February 9, 2009 8:55 AM

My favorites in order

Reading T1

Lehigh Valley T3

New York Central S1

Pennsylvania R1

Soviet Rails Northern

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Schererville, Indiana
  • 62 posts
Posted by matthewg on Saturday, February 7, 2009 9:24 PM

 Western Maryland Patomic

Reading T-1

C&O J3a

MILW S3

N&W J

 

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Huntsville, AR
  • 1,250 posts
Posted by oldline1 on Saturday, February 7, 2009 5:07 PM

Here's my choices:

N&W J

Reading T-1

C&O J-3a 610-613

RF&P Governors

NC&StL Yellow Jackets & Stripes

Roger Huber

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: comanche, texas
  • 192 posts
Posted by fluff on Saturday, February 7, 2009 1:28 PM

i would think all 4 8 4s are good engines. too many to choose from. the J stays with me because it has the  most (80,000 lbs TE) and can still run 100 plus mph. seems to be the best of both speed and tractive effort. with that being said, i have tons of books that show a burlington 4-8-4 pulling 155 empty boxcars, and some santa fe engines with 100 plus cars just to name a few with less tractive effort than the J. 

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,326 posts
Posted by selector on Saturday, February 7, 2009 11:50 AM

This type of thread can be fun, but I'm afraid it will be inconclusive except to reveal people's preferences in variance.  We discussed this question at great length about four years ago in the Classic Trains forum.  The problem lies in defining "top", or "best".  There are so many factors and variables to take into consideration, not the least of which is the terrain and working requirement set out at the time of design and matching that requirement to how the engines performed in an objective manner.  It would be a gargantuan task to work through all the reams of paperwork and records, assuming they were veridical and that the standards of measurement were the same from road to road...which they were not.

So, with what little I know, and I do emphasize little, my choices, especially if I were to be rewarded with even 30 minutes of footplate time on them as a result of my selection, would be:

First, the S1b Niagara

Second, the J Class

Third, the UP's FEF, don't really/can't really say which version...pick one for me...

Fourth, ATSF 3759, the one on display at Kingman, AZ

Fifth, just 'cuz, the CN/GTW U 3/4 class flyers.

-Crandell

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,501 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Saturday, February 7, 2009 10:09 AM

In no particular order:

SAR 25 class

SNCF 242 A 1

N&W J

C&NW H

ATSF 3776 class (2900's were war babies and heavier)

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    November 2007
  • From: Southern California
  • 1,475 posts
Posted by New Haven I-5 on Saturday, February 7, 2009 12:54 AM

 

C&O's Greenbrier class 

 ATSF's 3751 class

SP's GS4 class

N&W J class

MLW's S3 class

                                  A mighty fine lineup of steam locomotives....

                                                                  Luke

- Luke

Modeling the Southern Pacific in the 1960's-1980's

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Friday, February 6, 2009 6:50 PM

SAR 'Red Devil'

N&W J

NYC Niagara

SP GS3-6

ATSF 2900

(UP's FEF-3 missed the cut because of its limited cutoff.  Its main bearings can't handle all the power the cylinders can put out.)

Chuck

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: comanche, texas
  • 192 posts
top 5 4-8-4s
Posted by fluff on Friday, February 6, 2009 5:44 PM

ok, lets here them. whats your opinion. mine would be, in no particular order...

santa fe....probably the 2900s

norfolk and western Js (who would have ever thought that!)

new york central's niagra's

union pacifics last batch

c & o 610-614

rock island's and the southern pacific's should be there i guess (no roller bearings for the sp) not sure about the rock island engines.   

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy