I had forgotton about the CNJ 2-8-2's, and you are correct. But I do not recall any CNJ passenger steam locomotives that did not have Wooten fireboxes. In addition to the Wooten firebox Pacifics, they had gobs of caamelback ten wheelers. And I wonder why the Reading continued to build/buy locomotives with Wootens if they were no longer necessary, the postwar Pacifics. But then the Reading 4-8-4's had regular fireboxes! Or so it appears. Strange.
But I guess the earlier question is answered. All used the same kind of coal which worked OK in all types of fireboxes.
CNJ had some USRA 2-8-2s, didn't they? And maybe other engines with conventional fireboxes. Far as I'm concerned the question is, did the CNJ still burn any anthracite in late steam years? How about DL&W? Or RDG? Any reason why a wide firebox wouldn't burn soft coal?
We could look for pics showing the tenders of B&O engines departing Jersey City, but I'd guess it's a safe bet they did take coal there.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.