Trains.com

S160s 5197 & 6046

13532 views
44 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: GB
  • 108 posts
S160s 5197 & 6046
Posted by samoht on Monday, January 7, 2008 11:01 AM
 Hi All, Been a member for several years now, this is my first posting so be gentle with me. Spent 5 years in the early 80s in S.C. loved the old Southern then the NS, also the Family Lines System.Since I came back to the U.K. got involved with the local preservation line. We have at present 2 S160s one of which is running and the other well on the way. Love the sound of the whistle down the valley. There's a couple of good photos on the web site,which is www.churnet-valley-railway.co.uk click on the news section.Enjoy Samoht
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Huntsville, AR
  • 1,250 posts
Posted by oldline1 on Sunday, January 13, 2008 12:59 AM

Samoht,

Welcome to the forum. I have been a great fan of the S-160's for many years. I was fortunate enough to have seen them at the US Army Transportation Center at Ft. Eustis, Virginai during the early 1970s and to have spent many hours riding, running and wiping the Reader Railroad #1702 when it was at Reader.

I would really love to see "Big Jim" running over there someday soon. I understood there were 4 S-160s in the UK.

Roger

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: GB
  • 108 posts
Posted by samoht on Sunday, January 13, 2008 5:25 AM

  Thanks for the reply Roger, There are 5 S160s in the U.K. 2253,3278,5197,5820 and 6064. Of these only 5197 is in service at the moment but 3 others are being restored. 5197 is due for it's 10 year overhaul at the end of the year and hopefully it will be a quick return to service as it will use the overhauled boiler  from 6046.Hopefully in 2 years time we should have both of them running.

The S160s are very popular over here and 5197 has been to several railways for what we call Stations at War.  On the line that we preserved S160s did actually run during and shortly after the war so it's not out of place here. Unfortunately none of  the S160s used in the U.K.survived so those that are here now have been scoured from overseas.

  Hoping to do another trip stateside next year and hear some of your long mournful whistles and horns. Cheers Jeff.

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: GB
  • 108 posts
Posted by samoht on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 3:39 AM

 

     Hi all, Does anyone know how many S160s were built, how many are in preservation and how many of these are in the U.S.A. They were so widely spread around the world I think we may be surprised at how many are still around. They could be the biggest class of preserved locos in the world. Cheers Jeff.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 4:47 AM
 samoht wrote:

 

     Hi all, Does anyone know how many S160s were built, how many are in preservation and how many of these are in the U.S.A. They were so widely spread around the world I think we may be surprised at how many are still around. They could be the biggest class of preserved locos in the world. Cheers Jeff.

 According toTourrett, "Allied War Locomotives" 2120 were built for the US Army.

There were three built for Jamaica, two for Peru and ten built new for Mexico, so 2135 total.

I think at least one is preserved in China.

By the way, there is no such thing as a "Class S-160". This is a misinterpretation of the Alco shorthand description of the type "280-S-160" where 280 meant 2-8-0 (obviously), the "S" indicated superheating and "160" indicated 160 000 lbs locomotive weight.

But S-160 is not a USATC classification or one used by anyone else.

But all Alco locomotives had this descrption used in tabulations, so a "Big Boy" was shown as 4884-S-800, so you could call them "class S-800" with as much justification.

That does mean a Big Boy weighed five times as much as a USATC 2-8-0, showing how small they were.

M636C

  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Sulzerland, UK
  • 337 posts
Posted by Simon Reed on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 2:49 PM

Samoht,

This was discussed on the monumental "British Railway Operations" thread:-

http://www.trains.com/trccs/forums/531254/ShowPost.aspx

I think it's within the last couple of pages.

Technically there are eight ex USATC 2-8-0's in the UK. Two are frames only, and one is dismantled (and for sale.)

As M636 points out, although S160 has become a generic class description only the Schenectady products can truly claim to be S160's. The Alco built ones are the currently dismantled one, and the one at the Mid Hants.

Yours were products of Lima (5197) and Baldwin (6046).  

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: GB
  • 108 posts
Posted by samoht on Wednesday, January 16, 2008 10:52 AM
  Simon, have read the first 2 and last 2 pages of British Railway Operations and was quite frankly bored to tears, I am not interested in the politics of railways. I am interested in most aspects of railways, but in particular preservation both here and in the U.S.A.. I am very interested in the as I call them the S160s. Can you supply me with the Nos. of the three that I have missed out in the U.K. I would be very grateful. Cheers Jeff.
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Sulzerland, UK
  • 337 posts
Posted by Simon Reed on Wednesday, January 16, 2008 2:06 PM

Now I've looked at this again I'm even more confused!

USATC "1631" is at Ruddington. This is either listed as Alco 70284 of 1942 OR Alco 70610 of 1943. The source giving the identity as 70610 is the Industrial Railway Society, whom I'd usually regard as the most reliable authority on identity disputes. Depending on the true identity of the frames the USATC number may be incorrect, but 1631 would correspond with a 1942 build.

Industrial Railway Society list the frames of 70284 as being at Ian Riley's, Buckley Wells.

The frames of USATC 2364 (Baldwin 69621 of 1943) are also listed at Buckley Wells by once source, at Ribble Valley, Preston by another source and not at all by the Industrial Railway Society. For what it's worth I don't think they're at Preston.

Make of the above what you will!       

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: GB
  • 108 posts
Posted by samoht on Thursday, January 17, 2008 5:26 AM
  Hi Simon, It seems as though there are a lot more S160s about than I thought,surely it must be the largest class of preserved locomotives in the world and also the most international.How many are are actually running both in the States and worldwide I'm not sure of. A new tender has been constructed for the 6046 and is nearly ready to be put on the frame,the bogies have been refurbished so it's all coming together. Cheers Jeff.
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Sulzerland, UK
  • 337 posts
Posted by Simon Reed on Thursday, January 17, 2008 2:26 PM

Jeff - The USATC at Ruddington has been confirmed as Alco 70610, USATC No. 2128. For sale, but dismantled and incomplete.

How many remain globally is a fine question. All of the UK examples have been imported (5197 came from China, 6046 from Hungary, others came from Italy and Poland) so there's doubtless others in Europe and beyond still existing.

How many are actually OPERABLE is probably an easier question - I'd suggest probably none!      

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: GB
  • 108 posts
Posted by samoht on Thursday, January 17, 2008 4:35 PM
  Simon, Don't forget that 5197 is running but surely there must be at least one running in the States.I think in the rest of the world they're just mounted and stuffed, I'd like to be proved wrong though.Cheers Jeff.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, January 20, 2008 9:35 AM
Please note the following.  There is one complete S160 and one chassis at Ruddington.  Neither is 2128, neither are for sale.  The two chassis are respectivley 1631 and 2364.  It has not yet been decided which chassis will be  the basis of the rebuild, as there are pros and cons to each.  The overhaul is wating the completion of other more urgent projects, but is expected to start within two years.
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Huntsville, AR
  • 1,250 posts
Posted by oldline1 on Friday, January 25, 2008 2:22 PM

There is one S-160 running in the USA. The TVRM has the #610 running and also has the remains of the #611 (ex-2628). The 611 is the engine that was converted in 1950 to use the Franklin Rotary Poppet valve gear. It was operated/tested on the Ma&Pa (Maryland & Pennsylvania RR) for about 18 months before moving on to Ft. Eustis, VA. 

The Great Smokey Mountains RR has the ex-Reader RR #1702. I understand it is down for an overhaul but should come back to life next year. Hopefully sooner!

There is an Alaska RR engine (#556) in a park in Anchorage, AK. Her sister, #557, is in Washington State and was for sale a few months ago. The owner passed away and the heirs were trying to sell the engine.

The ex-Ft. Eustis engines besides the 610 & 611 are scattered around and in various stages of repair.

606-Crewe, VA dressed up as N&W 606. Cosmetically nice.

607-Ft.Eustis, VA in the US Army museum. Exposed & deteriorating rapidly. Last operated in 1974?

612-Cass, WV totally neglected since arrival in 1974(?)

Those are the only eight S-160's left in the USA that I have been able to locate. The 610 was technically not one of the War Engines as she was built in 1952 or 53.


Roger

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: GB
  • 108 posts
Posted by samoht on Sunday, January 27, 2008 4:33 AM
 Roger, Many thanks for the information about the S-160s that remain in the USA, it seems difficult  both there and here to precisely ascertain how many are preserved. With those preserved in the rest of the world it must be 20+. Is this the biggest clas of locomotives that are preserved, certainly they must be the most global. Will be in Greenville SC in the Fall, does anyone know how far the TVRM and The Great Smokey Mountains RR are from there. Cheers Jeff.
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Huntsville, AR
  • 1,250 posts
Posted by oldline1 on Thursday, January 31, 2008 11:18 AM

Jeff, 

I hope your visit is a good one. Like I said the 1702 is supposed to be under a rebuild at this time. I believe the 610 is running now.

I would check out the web sites for the TVRM and GSM and get their addresses and then go to map quest to see about the driving between them. It's not a terribly long drive and it's an extremely beautiful area. If you have the time during your visit you could reasonably do Crewe and Newport News, VA to see the 606 and 607.

Enjoy and post some photos of the trip.

Roger

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: GB
  • 108 posts
Posted by samoht on Friday, February 1, 2008 6:07 AM

  

    Roger,Many thanks for the information. I went on the TVRM website it's absolutely superb, the virtual tour with all the sights and sounds of 610 were out of this world. It showed some of the differencies between the American and the exported locos the most obvious one I suppose is the cowcatcher, the whistle also sounds different, yours sounds a lot more mournful and moving.

It's strange that both the TVRM and our own CVR both have tunnels, ours is slightly longer at 1593 ft and still uses wooden keys to keep the rails in place, it is dry and when we walk the line ( I'm in the p-way ) its nice and cool in summer and warmer in the winter. Cheers Jeff.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Huntsville, AR
  • 1,250 posts
Posted by oldline1 on Sunday, February 3, 2008 12:36 AM

Jeff,

Have you been to "You Tube" and checked out the videos of the 610 at the TVRM? They have some nice stuff on her and the 4501 too. Also look up "S-160" and there are some great shots of the ones running in the UK.

Roger

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: GB
  • 108 posts
Posted by samoht on Wednesday, February 6, 2008 1:42 PM
 Thanks Roger. Can anyone tell me wether there were any differencies in the building of the S160s between the 3 loco builders. Looking at the 2 on the CRV a Lima and a Baldwin I cannot see anything different, apart from of course the makers plate and number. many thanks Jeff.
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Sulzerland, UK
  • 337 posts
Posted by Simon Reed on Wednesday, February 6, 2008 3:02 PM

Jeff,

I'd be inclined to suggest that the differences - if there are any - would be negligible.

They were built to a specification laid down by USATC and I should imagine that specification was rigorously adhered to.

As a UK comparison I'd suggest the 8F. The majority of 8F's were built during WW2 at a variety of locations but to Stanier drawings. Externally it was impossible to deduce where they were built.   

  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Bath, England, UK
  • 712 posts
Posted by Tulyar15 on Wednesday, February 13, 2008 11:00 AM
 samoht wrote:
that both the TVRM and our own CVR both have tunnels, ours is slightly longer at 1593 ft and still uses wooden keys to keep the rails in place, it is dry and when we walk the line ( I'm in the p-way ) its nice and cool in summer and warmer in the winter. Cheers Jeff.



CVR? Would that be Churnet Valley Railway? Not been to that line yet, must go sometime.

I work as a volunteer on the Avon Valley Railway, near Bristol.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: GB
  • 108 posts
Posted by samoht on Thursday, February 14, 2008 9:51 AM

   The tender tank for 6046 has now been fabricated from new and is ready to lifted on the refurbished bottom end. The work on the engine is progressing, but will slow down as the 8F 48173 recently purchased will shortly take priority. 5197 is still running well, rode behind her on Sunday for the Wizards Weekend with the Grandaughters.It sounded great echoing down the valley on a lovely sunny day.  Yes Tulyar15 it is the Churnet Valley Railway and you would be most welcome at any time.

Now heres a bargain on February 23rd ( Gala weekend ) between 12-30 and 17-15 YOU can drive the S160  from the bay platform down the demonstration line for just £10 or $20 if you can make it .Cheers to all, Jeff.

  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Bath, England, UK
  • 712 posts
Posted by Tulyar15 on Friday, February 15, 2008 3:12 AM
Hope your gala goes well Samoht. Unfortunately I wont be able to make it as on the AVR we're also running owing to the visit of newly overhauled GWR 0-6-2T #5619, which is normally based at Telford Horsehay Steam Trust. I'll have a look at your website sometime and hopefully visit later in the year.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: GB
  • 108 posts
Posted by samoht on Tuesday, February 19, 2008 9:53 AM

    

 For some great photos of S160 5197 look up www.davegibsonphotography.co.uk he is the offical photographer for the Churnet Valley. The photos are mixed with others in the galleries so enjoy.If there is much response I will get him to start a separate gallery on the 2 S160s. Cheers Jeff.

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: GB
  • 108 posts
Posted by samoht on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 8:11 AM

  Well we had a great gala last weekend, the S160 was in fine form,it was used banking a train from Froghall and the sounds of it pushing it's heart out was magic. It also worked singley and in double headed modes.There was also a queue to drive it for $18 and there is a video of it on U tube with wheelslip ( it's by br73082 ) mixed in with other locos in the gala. The second S160 was on display, framework complete,cylinders rebored almost ready to receive the wheels. The tender tank had been set upon it's wheels and frame.It's getting there. Cheers.

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: GB
  • 108 posts
Posted by samoht on Wednesday, February 27, 2008 10:44 AM
   I found this on another website www.holdys.pl/tomi/galerie/psmk/zebiec2.jpg Makes you want to weep don't it. The place is west of Katowice.Cheers
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: GB
  • 108 posts
Posted by samoht on Wednesday, March 5, 2008 11:00 AM
 Talked to the owner of the 2 S160s today, as 5197 is due for it's 10 year overhaul in December, it will depend on the progress of 6046, as to wether its by then overhauled boiler will go onto 6064 or 5197. I personally would like to see 6046 running so keeping my fingers crossed for it. Will keep you informed of the progress, Jeff.
  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 73 posts
Posted by awalker1829 on Monday, May 5, 2008 4:17 PM
610 isn't an S-160. She's a Class A-variant similar to but not the same as an S-160.
I am not an attorney. Nothing in this communication is intended to be considered legal advice. However, I am a legal professional who routinely deals with attorneys when they screw up their court filings.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: GB
  • 108 posts
Posted by samoht on Monday, May 5, 2008 5:13 PM
  Hi Mr.Walker, Sorry I don't know you first name but can you tell me what the main differences there are between the S160s and the class A veriant, would be much obliged. Cheers Jeff
  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 73 posts
Posted by awalker1829 on Tuesday, May 6, 2008 2:48 PM
Off the top of my head, I don't recall the exact particulars but it would be the tractive weight, perhaps cylinder bore and stroke as well. They look like the S-160 series but its the dimensions and power available that differ.
I am not an attorney. Nothing in this communication is intended to be considered legal advice. However, I am a legal professional who routinely deals with attorneys when they screw up their court filings.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: GB
  • 108 posts
Posted by samoht on Friday, June 13, 2008 9:14 AM
   We're having problems with the air brake pump on 5197 and the engine was transported to the ELR where the most knowledgable person (in the UK) on the air pump works on all the locomotives there. Unfortunately he has not solved the problem yet and its running with a petrol driven compressor in the tender. At least it is still running but the combination of steam and combustion engines does not seem quite right. Hope it is solved soon, will try to keep you informed of any progress. Jeff.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy