CNJ had some USRA 2-8-2s, didn't they? And maybe other engines with conventional fireboxes. Far as I'm concerned the question is, did the CNJ still burn any anthracite in late steam years? How about DL&W? Or RDG? Any reason why a wide firebox wouldn't burn soft coal?
We could look for pics showing the tenders of B&O engines departing Jersey City, but I'd guess it's a safe bet they did take coal there.
I had forgotton about the CNJ 2-8-2's, and you are correct. But I do not recall any CNJ passenger steam locomotives that did not have Wooten fireboxes. In addition to the Wooten firebox Pacifics, they had gobs of caamelback ten wheelers. And I wonder why the Reading continued to build/buy locomotives with Wootens if they were no longer necessary, the postwar Pacifics. But then the Reading 4-8-4's had regular fireboxes! Or so it appears. Strange.
But I guess the earlier question is answered. All used the same kind of coal which worked OK in all types of fireboxes.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.