Trains.com

Train hits cell phone talker

2249 views
40 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 1:24 PM
 vsmith wrote:
 zardoz wrote:
 Safety Valve wrote:

I enjoyed your little flatuant air story scaring the ones under the train. Heck, you had me worried for a moment he he.


It was even more fun if the station was on a grade; I would do a full release, then the slack would run out or in, thereby adding to the effect.
I keep having this mental image of roaches suddenly scurrying in all directions when the lights are turned onLaugh [(-D]


Excellent comparison!

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Richmond, VA
  • 200 posts
Posted by penncentral2002 on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 12:29 PM

 StillGrande wrote:
I think it says a lot that the guy admits he was engrossed in his call, yet his wife claims he wasn't on the phone and is basically saying the train snuck up and hit him.  She is arguing against HIS story. 

You'd be surprised how often that happens in court!  It can be very entertaining - especially when its not your witnesses.

Zack http://penncentral2002.rrpicturearchives.net/
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 10:57 AM
 StillGrande wrote:
I think it says a lot that the guy admits he was engrossed in his call, yet his wife claims he wasn't on the phone and is basically saying the train snuck up and hit him.  She is arguing against HIS story. 
Of course, it hid in the bushes and pounced on him when he wasnt looking.
-
Dewey and all, you guys REALLY need to rent the film "Wrongfully Accused" with Leasley Nielson and includes a really funny parody of the train accident in "The Fugative" only in this case, the train actually jumps the track and chases Nielson thru the woods & hiding behind trees. Its a riot and worth the rental price for that scene alone.

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 10:53 AM
 zardoz wrote:
 Safety Valve wrote:

I enjoyed your little flatuant air story scaring the ones under the train. Heck, you had me worried for a moment he he.


It was even more fun if the station was on a grade; I would do a full release, then the slack would run out or in, thereby adding to the effect.
I keep having this mental image of roaches suddenly scurrying in all directions when the lights are turned onLaugh [(-D]

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Alexandria, VA
  • 847 posts
Posted by StillGrande on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 10:51 AM
I think it says a lot that the guy admits he was engrossed in his call, yet his wife claims he wasn't on the phone and is basically saying the train snuck up and hit him.  She is arguing against HIS story. 
Dewey "Facts are meaningless; you can use facts to prove anything that is even remotely true! Facts, schmacks!" - Homer Simpson "The problem is there are so many stupid people and nothing eats them."
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 10:50 AM
 Safety Valve wrote:

I enjoyed your little flatuant air story scaring the ones under the train. Heck, you had me worried for a moment he he.


It was even more fun if the station was on a grade; I would do a full release, then the slack would run out or in, thereby adding to the effect.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 10:30 AM

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 9:39 AM

Zardoz,

Back on the Wash Beltway people just wont move over for me when confronted with 6 signals blinking in thier faces. So I pull the sleepy-driver act. One eye on the mirrior to the right, I allow the rig to drift over a little bit, swerve back and drift a little bit more at a more severe angle. usually they get out of the way by then.

Or I could simply put all the wheels 4 inches from thier driver's rear view mirrior and hold it steady for a moment. They aint got the right stuff to stay put. Once in a while that BMW contains a Type A Dominant type Lawyer or something and you will be hearing from the Saftey Officer later in the day making explainations to save your job =)

Today such aggressive driving is a BIG no no.

In really bad weather sometimes you have no choice but count slowly to ten and hope there is no crunch when you complete the lane change. =)

I enjoyed your little flatuant air story scaring the ones under the train. Heck, you had me worried for a moment he he.

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Richmond, VA
  • 200 posts
Posted by penncentral2002 on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 9:17 AM
 zardoz wrote:

Metra commuters also have a nasty habit of crawling under the train they just disembarked from while it sits at the station.  Some station stops for the really long trains can take up to two minutes.  So if they cut under the train, they can get to their cars ahead of the crowd.

Heaven forbid actually having to wait 2 whole minutes to get to their car!

Zack http://penncentral2002.rrpicturearchives.net/
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 8:30 AM
 Safety Valve wrote:
 tree68 wrote:

 SchemerBob wrote:
And that part about police escourting people UNDER the train cars? That is even MORE stupid if you ask me. What if the train moved suddenly??

There would be a rush on clean undergarments at the nearby department store.

Even better if it was a string of empty hoppers and they were pulling out the slack....

Or the roar of the air being released.

Nothing like a little steam blow down timed correctly to keep the people at bay. Who me? I know nothing.

Metra commuters also have a nasty habit of crawling under the train they just disembarked from while it sits at the station.  Some station stops for the really long trains can take up to two minutes.  So if they cut under the train, they can get to their cars ahead of the crowd.

What we liked to do was at the stations where this happened frequently, we would hold the brakes applied after we stopped.  Then, as we saw commuters begin to go under the train, we would release some of the air.  We hoped our actions would have three results: 1) cause them to need clean underwear; 2) make them look like idiots as they bolted out from under the train; and 3) cause them to consider the potential results of their stupid actions.

The train crew always told us that they liked watching the reactions of those morons when we released the air.

Of course, disembarking commuters would also walk around the front of the locomotive such that we would lose sight of them below the nose of the unit.  Not too much of a problem when we had firemen (apprentice engineers) on each train that could warn the engineer about the number of dolts "going around", but with no one on the passenger side of the unit, there is no way for the engineer to know if anyone is walking around your engine.  So when we get the signal to go, we just ring the bell and hope that those walking around have made it, and that nobody tripped and fell on the tracks.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Aledo IL
  • 1,728 posts
Posted by spokyone on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 6:56 AM
 Datafever wrote:
 spokyone wrote:

Does anyone remember HOW MAD the mayor was in Houston  when he saw this pic?

I don't.  Is there a story behind it? 

This is from a thread from 2 years ago. About the UP
"The city of Houston has begun installing surveillance cameras at troublesome railroad crossings, part of a plan Mayor Bill White and railroad officials hope will address concerns of safety and inconvenience.

"Promising stricter oversight of railways, White, joined by representatives of Union Pacific Railroad, presented a multi-pronged plan that targets freight trains that stop in Houston communities. Last year, a train blocked north Houston intersections for more than an hour, forcing students at McReynolds Middle School to crawl between rail cars to get to class on time."

============

So how will cameras address safety concerns???

dd
  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Mt. Fuji
  • 1,840 posts
Posted by Datafever on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 12:26 AM
 spokyone wrote:

Does anyone remember HOW MAD the mayor was in Houston  when he saw this pic?

I don't.  Is there a story behind it? 

"I'm sittin' in a railway station, Got a ticket for my destination..."
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Aledo IL
  • 1,728 posts
Posted by spokyone on Tuesday, January 30, 2007 8:53 PM
 Datafever wrote:

Quote of note:

After the parade passed, police escorted parade-goers under stalled train cars

And, of course, those people will remember at some point in the future how safe it was to go under the train cars and try it on their own when the need arises.Banged Head [banghead]

Does anyone remember HOW MAD the mayor was in Houston  when he saw this pic?

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,103 posts
Posted by ValleyX on Tuesday, January 30, 2007 8:34 PM
 coborn35 wrote:
 TomDiehl wrote:

Or Norfolk Southern trains are driven by the Conductor.

There is an emergency brake handle on the conductors side.

And conductors operate locomotives all the time.....

 

That's a blanket statement, in my part of the world, locomotives aren't being run by conductors.  Conductor needs a engineer's license to run a engine and we don't have any of those right now, nor do we seldom ever. 

  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: A State of Humidity
  • 2,441 posts
Posted by wallyworld on Tuesday, January 30, 2007 6:31 PM
I wonder if he stopped talking after he was hit. Somehow I see this guy being dragged along the ground still yapping animatedly about some nonsensical blather while his leg falls off..it reads like a Monty Python sketch..can you hear me now?  

Nothing is more fairly distributed than common sense: no one thinks he needs more of it than he already has.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, January 30, 2007 5:54 PM
 tree68 wrote:

 SchemerBob wrote:
And that part about police escourting people UNDER the train cars? That is even MORE stupid if you ask me. What if the train moved suddenly??

There would be a rush on clean undergarments at the nearby department store.

Even better if it was a string of empty hoppers and they were pulling out the slack....

Or the roar of the air being released.

Nothing like a little steam blow down timed correctly to keep the people at bay. Who me? I know nothing.

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Duluth,Minnesota,USA
  • 4,015 posts
Posted by coborn35 on Tuesday, January 30, 2007 5:53 PM
 TomDiehl wrote:

Or Norfolk Southern trains are driven by the Conductor.

There is an emergency brake handle on the conductors side.

And conductors operate locomotives all the time.....

Mechanical Department  "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."

The Missabe Road: Safety First

 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,011 posts
Posted by tree68 on Tuesday, January 30, 2007 5:09 PM

 SchemerBob wrote:
And that part about police escourting people UNDER the train cars? That is even MORE stupid if you ask me. What if the train moved suddenly??

There would be a rush on clean undergarments at the nearby department store.

Even better if it was a string of empty hoppers and they were pulling out the slack....

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: In the New York Soviet Socialist Republic!
  • 1,391 posts
Posted by PBenham on Tuesday, January 30, 2007 4:40 PM
Good Lord, ya see people a talkin' on their cell phones all the time all over the place, I saw a feller takin aCensored [censored] an' he was talkin ' on a cell phone. I know you think that's funny.Laugh [(-D] So's this: A feller falls into a manhole talkin' on his cell phone. He wouldn't call 911. Said his phone didn't have an 11 on it! Laugh [(-D]Laugh [(-D]Good Lord! We are so stupid, I thought we was 'jus dumb before, but now..Dunce [D)] Good Lord, please forgive me, bless the starving pigmies in New Guinea.Smile,Wink, & Grin [swg] But, it sure is funny!Laugh [(-D]Laugh [(-D]Laugh [(-D]
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Northeast Missouri
  • 869 posts
Posted by SchemerBob on Tuesday, January 30, 2007 4:22 PM
 CANADIANPACIFIC2816 wrote:
 Chris30 wrote:

Hello? Hello? Is this Joe Blow Lawyer? It is. Great. Hey, listen can I sue a railroad if I illegally cross the tracks and there were no warning signs, barricades, etc. to prevent me from doing so and then I got hit by a train. Uh huh. I see. WHAT!?! YOU'RE GONNA HAVE TO SPEAK UP! I'M STANDING ON THE TRACKS AND SOMEBODY IS BLOWING A HORN IN MY...

CC

Now THAT is FUNNY!!!Laugh [(-D]

CANADIANPACIFIC2816

Sign - Ditto [#ditto]

Seriously, at least this guy admitted that he was "engrosed" in his phone conversation and wasn't paying attention. Most people would say that "the engineer didn't blow the horn", or "there wern't any warning devices at the crossings," stuff like that.

And that part about police escourting people UNDER the train cars? That is even MORE stupid if you ask me. What if the train moved suddenly??

Long live the BNSF .... AND its paint scheme. SchemerBob
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Gator Country, Florida
  • 266 posts
Posted by NightrainAFD1987 on Tuesday, January 30, 2007 12:38 PM
 Chris30 wrote:

Hello? Hello? Is this Joe Blow Lawyer? It is. Great. Hey, listen can I sue a railroad if I illegally cross the tracks and there were no warning signs, barricades, etc. to prevent me from doing so and then I got hit by a train. Uh huh. I see. WHAT!?! YOU'RE GONNA HAVE TO SPEAK UP! I'M STANDING ON THE TRACKS AND SOMEBODY IS BLOWING A HORN IN MY...

CC

 

"Been injured by a passing train? Call me, Mr. Joe Blow lawyer at 555- HURT. Remember, we're still on the back of your yellow pages"

Sorry ...had to do it 

Duff Long live the AT&SF
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Richmond, VA
  • 200 posts
Posted by penncentral2002 on Tuesday, January 30, 2007 12:08 PM
 Chris30 wrote:

Hello? Hello? Is this Joe Blow Lawyer? It is. Great. Hey, listen can I sue a railroad if I illegally cross the tracks and there were no warning signs, barricades, etc. to prevent me from doing so and then I got hit by a train. Uh huh. I see. WHAT!?! YOU'RE GONNA HAVE TO SPEAK UP! I'M STANDING ON THE TRACKS AND SOMEBODY IS BLOWING A HORN IN MY...

CC

Funny, but laughing about it doesn't change that we as society want the railroad to take cost effective precautions to prevent accidents.

Besides, anyone can sue for anything (no suit against the cell phone provider and manufacturer for not having a warning label saying "do not speak on cell phone while standing on railroad tracks" - and he calls himself a lawyer?).  You should read some of those pro se prisoner lawsuits (like U.S. ex rel Mayo v. Satan and His Staff or Kent [copyright sign] Norman v. Ronald Reagan, et. al.)  Real funny stuff.  Winning on the other hand . . . .

Zack http://penncentral2002.rrpicturearchives.net/
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: SIOUX FALLS, SOUTH DAKOTA
  • 2,483 posts
Posted by CANADIANPACIFIC2816 on Tuesday, January 30, 2007 11:21 AM

I don't remember for sure when and where this happened, but last year some dunceDunce [D)] was run over by a Canadian Pacific train while walking right down the middle of the track. He was listening to heavy metal rock music through a pair of head phones and did not hear the blaring of the locomotive's horns. Said dunceDunce [D)] is now a DEAD dunce.Dead [xx(]. I think this just illustrates the point that there are brainless people out there that will never learn and are incapable of learning anything.

CANADIANPACIFIC2816

  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: SIOUX FALLS, SOUTH DAKOTA
  • 2,483 posts
Posted by CANADIANPACIFIC2816 on Tuesday, January 30, 2007 11:11 AM
 Chris30 wrote:

Hello? Hello? Is this Joe Blow Lawyer? It is. Great. Hey, listen can I sue a railroad if I illegally cross the tracks and there were no warning signs, barricades, etc. to prevent me from doing so and then I got hit by a train. Uh huh. I see. WHAT!?! YOU'RE GONNA HAVE TO SPEAK UP! I'M STANDING ON THE TRACKS AND SOMEBODY IS BLOWING A HORN IN MY...

CC

Now THAT is FUNNY!!!Laugh [(-D]

CANADIANPACIFIC2816

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Tuesday, January 30, 2007 11:04 AM
 Datafever wrote:

"We wanted to cite him with something," Nicaud said, "and there is no law against being clueless on railroad tracks."

Laugh [(-D]

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: near Chicago
  • 937 posts
Posted by Chris30 on Tuesday, January 30, 2007 10:41 AM

Hello? Hello? Is this Joe Blow Lawyer? It is. Great. Hey, listen can I sue a railroad if I illegally cross the tracks and there were no warning signs, barricades, etc. to prevent me from doing so and then I got hit by a train. Uh huh. I see. WHAT!?! YOU'RE GONNA HAVE TO SPEAK UP! I'M STANDING ON THE TRACKS AND SOMEBODY IS BLOWING A HORN IN MY...

CC

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Richmond, VA
  • 200 posts
Posted by penncentral2002 on Tuesday, January 30, 2007 10:22 AM
 Datafever wrote:
 penncentral2002 wrote:
 Chris30 wrote:

A temporary chain link fence along the right-way would have been very useful for this public event. Maybe next year...

CC

Likely next year.  Maybe a permanent fence wouldn't be a bad idea in that type of area depending upon train frequency. 

This type of incident is just as likely to happen at a crossing, so fencing is not a solution. 

Its a solution for preventing legal liability when people crossing the tracks at unapproved places get hit Wink [;)]

Zack http://penncentral2002.rrpicturearchives.net/
  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Mt. Fuji
  • 1,840 posts
Posted by Datafever on Tuesday, January 30, 2007 10:12 AM
 penncentral2002 wrote:
 Chris30 wrote:

A temporary chain link fence along the right-way would have been very useful for this public event. Maybe next year...

CC

Likely next year.  Maybe a permanent fence wouldn't be a bad idea in that type of area depending upon train frequency. 

This type of incident is just as likely to happen at a crossing, so fencing is not a solution. 

"I'm sittin' in a railway station, Got a ticket for my destination..."
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • 339 posts
Posted by Jack_S on Tuesday, January 30, 2007 10:10 AM

Just a failed attempt at thinning the herd.

Jack

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy