Have fun with your trains
vsmith wrote: Railfan1 wrote: Metrolink? Nahhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://k53.pbase.com/u16/espeeboy/small/39148814.2.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.pbase.com/espeeboy/scaxcpcurrier&h=120&w=160&sz=5&hl=en&start=20&tbnid=-Y9MB_4msxD7nM:&tbnh=74&tbnw=98&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dmetrolink%2Bwreck%26start%3D18%26ndsp%3D18%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26safe%3Doff%26sa%3DN Sorry, Doesnt count, Not due to Metrolink neglect, that was intentionally caused by a complete and total idiot who even as we speak is on his 437th "honeymoon" in prison. Good riddence to him.
Railfan1 wrote: Metrolink? Nahhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://k53.pbase.com/u16/espeeboy/small/39148814.2.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.pbase.com/espeeboy/scaxcpcurrier&h=120&w=160&sz=5&hl=en&start=20&tbnid=-Y9MB_4msxD7nM:&tbnh=74&tbnw=98&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dmetrolink%2Bwreck%26start%3D18%26ndsp%3D18%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26safe%3Doff%26sa%3DN
Metrolink? Nah
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://k53.pbase.com/u16/espeeboy/small/39148814.2.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.pbase.com/espeeboy/scaxcpcurrier&h=120&w=160&sz=5&hl=en&start=20&tbnid=-Y9MB_4msxD7nM:&tbnh=74&tbnw=98&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dmetrolink%2Bwreck%26start%3D18%26ndsp%3D18%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26safe%3Doff%26sa%3DN
CSX has no deferred maintenance. It's simply compensating for the overmaintenance inflicted on the lines by previous owners.
Their method of maintenance will make them look good sooner or later--they just have to be run into the ground, then they'll be closed for a "blitz" and restored.
Carl
Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)
CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)
So it seems that CSX is the unanimous choice for the worst kept. Which of their lines are the best kept and which are the worst? And what need to be done to get them up to the levels of the other Class 1's?
Lets see,
Amtrak? Don't think so....
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=172207
Not UP
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=153470
Not BNSF
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=82178
NS? Nah
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=71755
CSX? Give me a break...
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=73732
For me, its Metrolink
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=116868
or the Trona shortline
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=78279
For the main railroads I'd say BNSF and NS are tied for first place, UP second.
They are not going to win for quality of physical plant but I doubt if any railroad keeps its locomotives more shiny clean and new looking than the Wisconsin & Southern RR. Even though this is their official website I can tell you this is really what their roster looks like day in and day out.
http://www.wsorrailroad.com/gallery/calendar2006.html
http://www.wsorrailroad.com/gallery/calendar2007.html
http://www.wsorrailroad.com/gallery/wallpaper.html
Dave Nelson
kfleeman1 wrote:I would have to put NS and BNSF in a tie for 1st, CP and UP in a tie for 2nd, then CN, and finally CSX. KCS would be in there somewhere between CP/UP and CN.
I would say BNSF first and NS a close second. I know little about the CP so I can't place them in the order. While the UP's mainline from Chicago west to California is in great shape the KCS is better overall than the UP and is certainly superior to the CN's former ICG lines. CSX wins last place hands down.
Mark
Datafever wrote:You mean that CSX isn't #1?
FOFLMAO...
LC
You'd almost certainly have to give those honors to the Florida East Coast.
Of the big railroads, probably NS, followed by BNSF and UP (roughly a tie), CP, CN, and CSX.
I'm sure I'd get plenty of disagreement on that, though.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.