Trains.com

Diesel Units

2145 views
13 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Diesel Units
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 12, 2003 1:28 PM
Can anyone say for sure what units run with what types of trains generally? Ex. Coal trains usually have 6-axle units while transfers usually have 4-axle units. Do U-Boats run with Geeps?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 12, 2003 2:42 PM
Most every thing today is being pulled by 6 axle loco's. EMD & GE don't even list a 4 axle road loco. in their catalog any more. As for MU lash-ups, a power coordinator can put a GE AC6000 with an EMD SW1500 if he had the strange desire to do so. You could also run the AC6000 from the cab of the little switcher if you wanted to. And you are correct in the assumption that the 4 axles are used mainly for switching, yard and transfer work.[:D]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 12, 2003 3:17 PM
I saw a picture of a GP-30 and a Western Mayland F-Unit pulling toghether! Anyway thanks.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Richland WA
  • 361 posts
Posted by kevarc on Sunday, October 12, 2003 10:05 PM
NS has issued guidelines on what unit can be mu'ed together. They want each consists to be like units. They do not what different HP engines together, mixed 4 and 6 axle units and AC & DC units together.

Chessie ran anything over Sandpatch, they would use GP's on coal drags down Sandpatch.
Kevin Arceneaux Mining Engineer, Penn State 1979
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Monday, October 13, 2003 7:39 AM
You can MU almost any modern units together. Not so on older units due to different control systems in some pre 1960 deisels.

You do have to be careful of gear ratios. Put a passenger (or high speed) engine in with a "regular" engine on a drag freight and you will burn up the passenger engine's traction motors.

Often switch engines with AAR type B switcher trucks (a normal "switch engine" truck) have a speed restriction on them because the truck isn't as stable at higher speeds. Those switchers with road trucks (MP15's, SW150's with Flexicoil trucks) are designed to operate at road speeds.

There are also restrictions on engines with non-alignment controlled drawbars. The alignment control keeps the drawbars in line during buffing (shoving) forces. If you have too much tonnage behind engines without alignment control couplers, applying the brakes or shoving the train could cause the drawbars to skew sideways and derail the train or engines. For example Amtrak F40's used in freight service have to be on the point because they have non-alignment control drawbars.

Same with mixing AC and DC traction. You have to be especially careful if the AC is in the lead. An AC will keep on pulling down to low speeds that will fry a DC traction motor (why AC's are used on coal trains).

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Monday, October 13, 2003 10:05 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dehusman

You can MU almost any modern units together. Not so on older units due to different control systems in some pre 1960 deisels.

You do have to be careful of gear ratios. Put a passenger (or high speed) engine in with a "regular" engine on a drag freight and you will burn up the passenger engine's traction motors.

Often switch engines with AAR type B switcher trucks (a normal "switch engine" truck) have a speed restriction on them because the truck isn't as stable at higher speeds. Those switchers with road trucks (MP15's, SW150's with Flexicoil trucks) are designed to operate at road speeds.

There are also restrictions on engines with non-alignment controlled drawbars. The alignment control keeps the drawbars in line during buffing (shoving) forces. If you have too much tonnage behind engines without alignment control couplers, applying the brakes or shoving the train could cause the drawbars to skew sideways and derail the train or engines. For example Amtrak F40's used in freight service have to be on the point because they have non-alignment control drawbars.

Same with mixing AC and DC traction. You have to be especially careful if the AC is in the lead. An AC will keep on pulling down to low speeds that will fry a DC traction motor (why AC's are used on coal trains).
We are starting to see the new Dash 9 AC's ahead of the SD70 on coal trains now. The Dash 9 DC's are only on freight. Now I know why.

Thanx

Mookie

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: US
  • 286 posts
Posted by dekemd on Monday, October 13, 2003 12:15 PM
CSX doesn't seem to care about what's lashed together. ACs, DCs, four axles, six axles, it don't matter as long as it runs. It's very common to see two AC4400s and a SD40-2 behind them on coal freights. Saw one the other day that had two sd40-2s with a four axle GE between them. NS does seem to keep like units together. The odd thing NS does is use SD80MACS for locals! Never heard an explanation why.

Derrick
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 15, 2003 3:45 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by kevarc

NS has issued guidelines on what unit can be mu'ed together. They want each consists to be like units. They do not what different HP engines together, mixed 4 and 6 axle units and AC & DC units together.

Chessie ran anything over Sandpatch, they would use GP's on coal drags down Sandpatch.



Not true about NS. if it is then they don't go by these guidelines whatsoever. I live on 3 track mainline of NS, and have experianced a load of different combos of GEs and EMDs mu'ed together. Most common are Dash 9s or 8s with SD60s and 70s. Also, they like thier SD40-2s, and use them for helpers as well as front end primary power, which they usually will throw a D9 behind with a few other different locomotives.
NS has only 16 AC units, which they keep from mainline duty and for what reason I don't know, they mostly use them for local and work trains, or branch coal service.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 15, 2003 3:49 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dekemd

CSX doesn't seem to care about what's lashed together. ACs, DCs, four axles, six axles, it don't matter as long as it runs. It's very common to see two AC4400s and a SD40-2 behind them on coal freights. Saw one the other day that had two sd40-2s with a four axle GE between them. NS does seem to keep like units together. The odd thing NS does is use SD80MACS for locals! Never heard an explanation why.

Derrick


Only reason I'm aware of Derrick is the fact that NS does not like AC motive power and keep them segregated from the rest of thier DC fleet. I travel thru PA on the weekends near Indiana, and usually see 2 pairs of the 80MACs in coal service on a branch line. I live above the gallitzin tunnels in PA, and quite often see a set of them delivering the local, as you have mentioned. They get serviced in town next to me, Cresson, PA, and I frequently watch 4-8 of them there. Also NS will put them on thier local work trains.

Sil
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Wednesday, October 15, 2003 4:06 PM
Only reason I'm aware of Derrick is the fact that NS does not like AC motive power and keep them segregated from the rest of thier DC fleet. I travel thru PA on the weekends near Indiana, and usually see 2 pairs of the 80MACs in coal service on a branch line. I live above the gallitzin tunnels in PA, and quite often see a set of them delivering the local, as you have mentioned. They get serviced in town next to me, Cresson, PA, and I frequently watch 4-8 of them there. Also NS will put them on thier local work trains.

Sil


Silvio,
I ask this out of ignorance and because you know way more about NS ops than I do, but if NS doesn't like AC units, why have them? It seems like they're not using them efficiently or to their full potential. Did they get them from Conrail or buy them new and then decide they didn't like them? It seems they would be ideal for coal drags, from what I gather from this and other posts.

Dan
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Defiance Ohio
  • 13,319 posts
Posted by JoeKoh on Wednesday, October 15, 2003 4:28 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dharmon

Only reason I'm aware of Derrick is the fact that NS does not like AC motive power and keep them segregated from the rest of thier DC fleet. I travel thru PA on the weekends near Indiana, and usually see 2 pairs of the 80MACs in coal service on a branch line. I live above the gallitzin tunnels in PA, and quite often see a set of them delivering the local, as you have mentioned. They get serviced in town next to me, Cresson, PA, and I frequently watch 4-8 of them there. Also NS will put them on thier local work trains.

Sil


Silvio,
I ask this out of ignorance and because you know way more about NS ops than I do, but if NS doesn't like AC units, why have them? It seems like they're not using them efficiently or to their full potential. Did they get them from Conrail or buy them new and then decide they didn't like them? It seems they would be ideal for coal drags, from what I gather from this and other posts.

Dan

I saw a dash9 an emd(sd-50)and a gp38ac pulling a freight in archbold ohio last night.
stay safe
Joe

Deshler Ohio-crossroads of the B&O Matt eats your fries.YUM! Clinton st viaduct undefeated against too tall trucks!!!(voted to be called the "Clinton St. can opener").

 

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Harrisburg PA / Dover AFB DE
  • 1,482 posts
Posted by adrianspeeder on Wednesday, October 15, 2003 4:50 PM
NS got the AC units from Conrail

Adrianspeeder

USAF TSgt C-17 Aircraft Maintenance Flying Crew Chief & Flightline Avionics Craftsman

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Wednesday, October 15, 2003 6:06 PM
Not an issue as much as it used to be, but anything DRGW had that was SD45, SD40T-2 or older had a 21 pin MU connection while everything else was 18 or 19 pin in the cabling. SP could MU their equipment with the DRGW stuff, but few others could. Part of the reason why DRGW power rarely wandered very far from home.
Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: WV
  • 1,251 posts
Posted by coalminer3 on Thursday, October 16, 2003 1:28 PM
C&O "in the day" mu'd GE U25s with EMD power in mine shifter service right before the U-Boats went south to Mexico. This was usually GP7s or 9s with a U25B. Crews hated the 25s because they slipped and just did not work that well in this kind of application. Also, because of comfort issues, they preferred to have the GE as the last unit where possible. I recall seeing three GP9s and a U25B with a long shifter. GE had crapped out and the remaining EMDs were dragging it along "for an airing" as the conductor said. It was not a matter of "liking" or "disliking" Ge vs EMD power; some stuff just worked better than others in mine service. Incidentally, the last 4-axle stuff that ran in shifter service around here were sets of GP40-2s. These did well.

work safe

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy