Trains.com

U.S. railroad accidents down; Pa. holds steady

404 views
1 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Southern Region now, UK
  • 820 posts
Posted by Hugh Jampton on Tuesday, October 24, 2006 6:02 AM
Just quoting the number of accidents is meaningless in itself, that's why we use figures like accidents per million ton miles etc. which gives a better indication of how frequent accidents occur.
Generally a lurker by nature

Be Alert
The world needs more lerts.

It's the 3rd rail that makes the difference.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
U.S. railroad accidents down; Pa. holds steady
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 24, 2006 3:55 AM

From the Pittsburgh Post Gazette:

"While last weekend's train derailment rocked New Brighton and Beaver Falls, forced more than 150 residents to flee and sparked fires and fears about safety, the simple truth is this: Such rail accidents aren't all that uncommon in Pennsylvania.

"Though rail accidents nationwide are down about 16 percent the first six months of the year, Pennsylvania's accident rate remained stagnant, with 54 accidents in each of the first six months of 2005 and 2006, said Steven Kulm, spokesman for the Federal Railroad Administration, the government's railroad regulatory agency.

"We're moving more freight than ever before, we have record capacity. You would think that you would see more accidents, but no," said Kelly Donley, assistant vice president of communications for the Association of American Railroads."

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06297/732472-85.stm

 

Dave

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy