Trains.com

Dash9-Dash8 MIXUP!!!!

5220 views
18 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Dash9-Dash8 MIXUP!!!!
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, September 24, 2003 6:24 PM
I was goinng to ask "Ask Trains", but i thought I'd ask you. Whats the difference between a Dash-8 and Dash-9(Field Marks)? I only see Norfolk and CSX. So far, this drives me nuts[xx(][xx(][xx(][xx(]+[xx(][xx(][xx(][xx(]!!!!

Arondak,

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Dash9-Dash8 MIXUP!!!!
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, September 24, 2003 6:24 PM
I was goinng to ask "Ask Trains", but i thought I'd ask you. Whats the difference between a Dash-8 and Dash-9(Field Marks)? I only see Norfolk and CSX. So far, this drives me nuts[xx(][xx(][xx(][xx(]+[xx(][xx(][xx(][xx(]!!!!

Arondak,

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:31 AM
There are only a few subtle changes between Dash 8 and Dash 9 units, although on Santa Fe (I know, BNSF) the trucks were different between C40-8 and C44-9 units. The Dash 8s had conventional trucks and Dash 9s had the later Hi-Ad design with coil springs beside the axle boxes. This would apply on NS but I think CSX kept using the old trucks.

Another change was that the air intake was smaller and further back from the cab. This was so they could standardise these parts with the AC4400, which had bigger dynamic brakes, which in all these locomotives was just in front of the main air intake. The air intake is located at the point where the hood drops down to the engine cover, in front of the engine itself.

I hope this is some help!
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:31 AM
There are only a few subtle changes between Dash 8 and Dash 9 units, although on Santa Fe (I know, BNSF) the trucks were different between C40-8 and C44-9 units. The Dash 8s had conventional trucks and Dash 9s had the later Hi-Ad design with coil springs beside the axle boxes. This would apply on NS but I think CSX kept using the old trucks.

Another change was that the air intake was smaller and further back from the cab. This was so they could standardise these parts with the AC4400, which had bigger dynamic brakes, which in all these locomotives was just in front of the main air intake. The air intake is located at the point where the hood drops down to the engine cover, in front of the engine itself.

I hope this is some help!
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 2,849 posts
Posted by wabash1 on Thursday, September 25, 2003 8:40 AM
the differance between a dash 8 and 9 is a high ad design. exsplain this please, also you mentioned bigger dynamic brakes would you elaborate on this also please.
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 2,849 posts
Posted by wabash1 on Thursday, September 25, 2003 8:40 AM
the differance between a dash 8 and 9 is a high ad design. exsplain this please, also you mentioned bigger dynamic brakes would you elaborate on this also please.
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Thursday, September 25, 2003 8:54 AM
Oh, you lucky person! Being around CSX, which has its 9000 series of GE locomotives, which seem to be neither Dash 8 nor Dash 9 (or both, depending on whom you ask!).

Other than that, a Dash 9 has split cooling (that's been covered in "Ask Trains"), which makes the radiator "wings" at the rear of the unit thicker from top to bottom.

The trucks remain the best spotting feature. GE's hi-ad trucks have a sort of flaring by the axle ends that remind me a little of horses' hooves. These trucks are also under most GE AC4400CWs (again, CSX has a few units that have or had trucks of a different design...GE's radial trucks, which have been less than successful).

You know, "Ask Trains" wouldn't be a bad idea...they could run comparative photos there.

Carl

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Thursday, September 25, 2003 8:54 AM
Oh, you lucky person! Being around CSX, which has its 9000 series of GE locomotives, which seem to be neither Dash 8 nor Dash 9 (or both, depending on whom you ask!).

Other than that, a Dash 9 has split cooling (that's been covered in "Ask Trains"), which makes the radiator "wings" at the rear of the unit thicker from top to bottom.

The trucks remain the best spotting feature. GE's hi-ad trucks have a sort of flaring by the axle ends that remind me a little of horses' hooves. These trucks are also under most GE AC4400CWs (again, CSX has a few units that have or had trucks of a different design...GE's radial trucks, which have been less than successful).

You know, "Ask Trains" wouldn't be a bad idea...they could run comparative photos there.

Carl

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Friday, September 26, 2003 2:56 AM
To expand my earlier comments, for Wabash1, the "Hi Ad" stands for high adhesion. These trucks are connected to the locomotive frame directly through pads made from rubber bonded to steel as "Sandwiches", steel/rubber/steel/rubber (and so on). This reduces the opportunity for the truck to tilt, and reduces the possibility of mainly the lead axle slipping. The standard trucks have similar springs, but they connect to a bolster that connects to a pivot on the frame, in the center of the truck, which allows a little more tilting to take place under load. The dynamic brakes are basically sets of resistors, each with its own electric cooling fan. Because the AC motors can take higher currents as motors, when acting as generators (as they are in dynamic braking) they can produce higher currents and need one extra set of resistors with an extra grille.

A photo on the back of the Kalmbach "Field Guide" shows ATSF -8 and -9 units together, and different views of the same scene are inside.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Friday, September 26, 2003 2:56 AM
To expand my earlier comments, for Wabash1, the "Hi Ad" stands for high adhesion. These trucks are connected to the locomotive frame directly through pads made from rubber bonded to steel as "Sandwiches", steel/rubber/steel/rubber (and so on). This reduces the opportunity for the truck to tilt, and reduces the possibility of mainly the lead axle slipping. The standard trucks have similar springs, but they connect to a bolster that connects to a pivot on the frame, in the center of the truck, which allows a little more tilting to take place under load. The dynamic brakes are basically sets of resistors, each with its own electric cooling fan. Because the AC motors can take higher currents as motors, when acting as generators (as they are in dynamic braking) they can produce higher currents and need one extra set of resistors with an extra grille.

A photo on the back of the Kalmbach "Field Guide" shows ATSF -8 and -9 units together, and different views of the same scene are inside.
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 2,849 posts
Posted by wabash1 on Friday, September 26, 2003 6:58 AM
so you are saying the dash 8 is not a high adhesion engine and the way i am reading this that the dash 9 is a "ac" traction motor engine.?
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 2,849 posts
Posted by wabash1 on Friday, September 26, 2003 6:58 AM
so you are saying the dash 8 is not a high adhesion engine and the way i am reading this that the dash 9 is a "ac" traction motor engine.?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, September 26, 2003 10:43 AM
Yup Wabash he's right. Also those Hi-Ad trucks are a pain to work on too. You practically have to stand on your head just to change a brake shoe, let alone a traction motor.

P.S. A Dash-9 44CW has DC traction and the AC4400CW is AC.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, September 26, 2003 10:43 AM
Yup Wabash he's right. Also those Hi-Ad trucks are a pain to work on too. You practically have to stand on your head just to change a brake shoe, let alone a traction motor.

P.S. A Dash-9 44CW has DC traction and the AC4400CW is AC.
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 2,849 posts
Posted by wabash1 on Friday, September 26, 2003 8:50 PM
well I was leading him on to correct hiself but I must say that the dash 8 and dash 9 are considered high adhesion and they are also extended range on dynamic.and they are not ac traction motors they are dc traction motors.
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 2,849 posts
Posted by wabash1 on Friday, September 26, 2003 8:50 PM
well I was leading him on to correct hiself but I must say that the dash 8 and dash 9 are considered high adhesion and they are also extended range on dynamic.and they are not ac traction motors they are dc traction motors.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Sunday, September 28, 2003 2:28 AM
Guys, sorry if I have not been quite clear. What I said (it's still there) is that GE made the air intake smaller on the AC4400 because of the bigger dynamic installation, and this smaller air intake was used on the DC motor Dash-9s because GE only wanted to make one type of air intake. Pilbara Rail in Australia have enlarged the air intake on their Dash-9s because they operate in a hot desert climate, and new units from GE come with the bigger air intake. In the Dash-9, there is just empty space between the dynamic installation and the air intake, so Pilbara have used this space to make the air intake bigger by adding an extra grille in the space. The radiators are indeed different, as CshaveR, says, but that is harder to tell if you don't have both types of units together. The air intake size is fairly easy to tell when you are looking at the units alone.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Sunday, September 28, 2003 2:28 AM
Guys, sorry if I have not been quite clear. What I said (it's still there) is that GE made the air intake smaller on the AC4400 because of the bigger dynamic installation, and this smaller air intake was used on the DC motor Dash-9s because GE only wanted to make one type of air intake. Pilbara Rail in Australia have enlarged the air intake on their Dash-9s because they operate in a hot desert climate, and new units from GE come with the bigger air intake. In the Dash-9, there is just empty space between the dynamic installation and the air intake, so Pilbara have used this space to make the air intake bigger by adding an extra grille in the space. The radiators are indeed different, as CshaveR, says, but that is harder to tell if you don't have both types of units together. The air intake size is fairly easy to tell when you are looking at the units alone.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Monday, September 29, 2003 2:55 AM
I finally got round to checking my facts in the "Contemporary Diesel Spotter's Guide" and the "Field Guide to Diesel Locomotives". There is a particular problem with the CSX 9000 class, which are C44-8, and were built after Dash 9 production started. CSX apparently paint the class C44-9 on them, and they have Dash 9 radiators and steps, but Dash 8 trucks, and a Dash 8 air intake. If GE call them Dash 8, that's good enough for me! In my earlier posts, I described these as Dash 9 with Dash 8 trucks, which isn't far wrong. I do understand why Arondak was confused if he only sees CSX and NS units. The photos in the "Field Guide" are good, and the Santa Fe photos, where the air intake is dark on the silver hood are the best guide. I worked this out from my own photos of ATSF units in Cajon Pass, when I got side on photos of a Dash 8 and a Dash 9 together.

Sorry about any extra confusion, but the air intake size is so far still a correct way of telling Dash 8 and Dash 9 apart.

Peter
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Monday, September 29, 2003 2:55 AM
I finally got round to checking my facts in the "Contemporary Diesel Spotter's Guide" and the "Field Guide to Diesel Locomotives". There is a particular problem with the CSX 9000 class, which are C44-8, and were built after Dash 9 production started. CSX apparently paint the class C44-9 on them, and they have Dash 9 radiators and steps, but Dash 8 trucks, and a Dash 8 air intake. If GE call them Dash 8, that's good enough for me! In my earlier posts, I described these as Dash 9 with Dash 8 trucks, which isn't far wrong. I do understand why Arondak was confused if he only sees CSX and NS units. The photos in the "Field Guide" are good, and the Santa Fe photos, where the air intake is dark on the silver hood are the best guide. I worked this out from my own photos of ATSF units in Cajon Pass, when I got side on photos of a Dash 8 and a Dash 9 together.

Sorry about any extra confusion, but the air intake size is so far still a correct way of telling Dash 8 and Dash 9 apart.

Peter
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 2,849 posts
Posted by wabash1 on Monday, September 29, 2003 4:30 AM
the easiest way for me to tell them apart is that i have never seen a dash 8 wide body. and ive never seen anything of a dash 9 in a standard cab. In my opinion ( and i may be wrong i have been before) the dash 8 has never been a wide body. now as far as the c44 to me its just a dash 9 only newer.
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 2,849 posts
Posted by wabash1 on Monday, September 29, 2003 4:30 AM
the easiest way for me to tell them apart is that i have never seen a dash 8 wide body. and ive never seen anything of a dash 9 in a standard cab. In my opinion ( and i may be wrong i have been before) the dash 8 has never been a wide body. now as far as the c44 to me its just a dash 9 only newer.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 29, 2003 9:31 AM
cn has dash 8's with the draper taper....carbody
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 29, 2003 9:31 AM
cn has dash 8's with the draper taper....carbody
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 29, 2003 11:03 AM
Hey Waba***he UP has Dash-8's with both standard and wide noses.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 29, 2003 11:03 AM
Hey Waba***he UP has Dash-8's with both standard and wide noses.
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 2,849 posts
Posted by wabash1 on Monday, September 29, 2003 7:02 PM
never seen a dash 8 in a wide body but i did today did see a dash 9 that was not a wide body. it was standard cab. just correcting myself before i get flamed.
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 2,849 posts
Posted by wabash1 on Monday, September 29, 2003 7:02 PM
never seen a dash 8 in a wide body but i did today did see a dash 9 that was not a wide body. it was standard cab. just correcting myself before i get flamed.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 30, 2003 10:57 AM
The weird thing is that when NS got their Dash-8's they were running them long hood front. I'm still trying to figure that one out. Their reasoning behind that was so the crew had better visability of their train. Yeah OK???
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 30, 2003 10:57 AM
The weird thing is that when NS got their Dash-8's they were running them long hood front. I'm still trying to figure that one out. Their reasoning behind that was so the crew had better visability of their train. Yeah OK???

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy