Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.
http://www.yanktonsd.com/product.cfm?cat_id=2&subcat_id=57&product_id=68 A view of the Meridian Bridge, Yankton, S.D.
Trailryder wrote: So let’s get this straight A bridge on the Missouri river south of Pierre and north of Sioux City, adjoining two states, built for railroad use but never used by one, and still in some form of use today. The city in question was served by Great Northern, Milwaukee Road, and Chicago North Western But they never used this bridge. lets see……….. the Meridian Bridge Just South of Yankton, South Dakota P.S. Sleep is highly over rated Later Bill
So let’s get this straight
A bridge on the Missouri river south of Pierre and north of Sioux City, adjoining two states, built for railroad use but never used by one, and still in some form of use today. The city in question was served by Great Northern, Milwaukee Road, and Chicago North Western But they never used this bridge.
lets see……….. the Meridian Bridge Just South of Yankton, South Dakota
P.S. Sleep is highly over rated
Later Bill
Ding! Ding! We have a winner!! The Meridian bridge was built in the 1920's, as a two-storey bridge, meant to have rails on the bottom level, autos on the top. Trouble was, the bridge promoters could never get a railroad interested.
Good job Trailryder. You've earned yourself a nap.
Crofton, Nebraska?
Trailryder wrote: Nicbrara, Nebraska?
Nicbrara, Nebraska?
No. That bridge is only 5-10 years old. I can remember going accross the ferry to Niobrara when I was in college at Springfield, around 1980.
Trailryder wrote: is the city in question south of Sioux City?
is the city in question south of Sioux City?
Hey, you're up pretty early.
nanaimo73 wrote:South Dakota would be at the north end and north Nebraska would be at the south end ?
Yes.
No. Not south of Sioux City.
nanaimo73 wrote:Are the two ends in different States ?
Yes. Somebody's on the trail!
nanaimo73 wrote:Would it be a good bridge for you to use to visit Mookie ?
Yes, it would be.
blhanel wrote: Murphy Siding wrote: blhanel wrote://throws another dart at the mapMobridge? You're trying too hard. Not Mobridge. Trains have been crossing that bridge daily for probably 100 years, first Milwaukee Road, and now BNSF. So Mobridge only has one bridge, eh? I would have thought with a name like that they'd have mo' bridges.//ba-dum-ching
Murphy Siding wrote: blhanel wrote://throws another dart at the mapMobridge? You're trying too hard. Not Mobridge. Trains have been crossing that bridge daily for probably 100 years, first Milwaukee Road, and now BNSF.
blhanel wrote://throws another dart at the mapMobridge?
You're trying too hard. Not Mobridge. Trains have been crossing that bridge daily for probably 100 years, first Milwaukee Road, and now BNSF.
For what it's worth, the current railroad bridge is (I *think*) the third one in the same spot. They just keep building mo' and mo'.
Trailryder wrote: Wynot, Nebraska? p.s. thanks for keeping me up all night.
Wynot, Nebraska?
p.s. thanks for keeping me up all night.
No. Not Wynot, Nebraska, You're welcone! Hope you slept in this morning.
blhanel wrote:Upstream from Pierre?EDIT: Last post for tonight, time for bed here.
No. Not upstream from Pierre.
ericsp wrote:Does a railroad cross the Missouri River within 100 miles of this bridge?
Yes
Brian (IA) http://blhanel.rrpicturearchives.net.
blhanel wrote:This shouldn't take long- not many towns with bridges over the Missouri in SD.Pierre!
Good guess, but not Pierre. CNW built that bridge, and used it a lot. DM&E owns it now and uses it almost daily. The answer might be harder than you think.
"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)
blhanel wrote:Chamberlain, SD.
Not Chamberlain. Oddly, the bridge of which I speak was built many, many years after the Milwaukee Road bridge at Chamberlain. Sadly, I don't think the railroad bridge at Chamberlain has seen a train in quite a while, and may never see one again.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.