Trains.com

What happened to The Rock Island?

17969 views
26 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,901 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Wednesday, November 22, 2017 11:13 PM

The discussions have about the same amount of info as on here.  Very little.  Those pictures on that site are old ones from when the RI was still operating.  It looks like someone trying to start up a short line and/or contract switching company.  I don't know if the person had ties to the RI.  There are a couple of short lines where the owner or at least the original owner had some ties to the RI.  The  Arkansas - Oklahoma Railroad (A-OK) comes to mind. http://www.aokrr.com/ 

They use an RI inspired paint scheme and logo.

Jeff 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,023 posts
Posted by tree68 on Wednesday, November 22, 2017 1:41 PM

Paul of Covington
But the locomotive repairmen would be bored to death, sitting back with their feet up.

Thumbs Up

Annnnnd, not only would we have "toasters," but we'd have "washing machines..."

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    July 2010
  • From: Louisiana
  • 2,310 posts
Posted by Paul of Covington on Wednesday, November 22, 2017 12:00 PM

tree68
 
BaltACD
Wonder what a Maytag locomotive would have looked like?

A lot of chrome and fancy knobs?

 

   But the locomotive repairmen would be bored to death, sitting back with their feet up.

_____________ 

  "A stranger's just a friend you ain't met yet." --- Dave Gardner

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,023 posts
Posted by tree68 on Wednesday, November 22, 2017 10:44 AM

BaltACD
Wonder what a Maytag locomotive would have looked like?

A lot of chrome and fancy knobs?

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    August 2014
  • 8 posts
Posted by Plowhandle on Wednesday, November 22, 2017 8:08 AM

Please send me links to any discussions your other CRI&P Groups are having about this new 'operator' of the Rock...is any of his website TRUE - the locomotives and cars with the Bankruptcy Blue actually operating ?

He's a lot of bluster in my book - how much of his "railroad" is real ?

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Antioch, IL
  • 4,371 posts
Posted by greyhounds on Tuesday, November 21, 2017 12:04 PM

This is a good book on the demise of the Rock Island.

https://www.amazon.com/Rock-Island-Requiem-Collapse-Mighty-ebook/dp/B00W8FE83K/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1511287203&sr=1-1&keywords=rock+island+requiem#customerReviews

Be warned, it's not focused on rail operations.  It's focused on the financial problems, and who/what caused them.

"By many measures, the U.S. freight rail system is the safest, most efficient and cost effective in the world." - Federal Railroad Administration, October, 2009. I'm just your average, everyday, uncivilized howling "anti-government" critic of mass government expenditures for "High Speed Rail" in the US. And I'm gosh darn proud of that.
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Monday, November 20, 2017 7:21 PM

Everything I needed to know about the Rock Island, I learned by playing the board game Rail Baron.

The Rock Island's slogan should have been "Everywhere - Slowly".  The line connected all the right dots in the worst possible fashion.

Exactly what you don't want when the industry is consolidating down to just a few roads.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,901 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Monday, November 20, 2017 6:41 PM

Since my last post, the IAIS did a heritage unit.  Also one, that while not an actual heritage unit, has a Rock Island inspired paint scheme.

That new company operating under the CRI&P name has been discussed on some of my RI groups.  Not a whole lot of information, but appears to be a short line/contract switching outfit starting up.  I see they're looking for engineers and conductors for "future" needs.  I don't think I'll send a resume.

Jeff 

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, November 20, 2017 4:58 PM

jeffhergert
The RI corporate structure eventually went to Maytag. Sadly, I'll never see a RI heriage unit. I guess the passenger engines Dan Sabin's Iowa Northern  acquired for the Hawkeye Express football trains is as close as it comes.

  Jeff        

Wonder what a Maytag locomotive would have looked like? Big Smile

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    August 2014
  • 8 posts
Posted by Plowhandle on Monday, November 20, 2017 10:52 AM

Supposedly, "the Rock Island Railroad" is back running.

 

https://rockislandrail.com/

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,901 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Monday, July 17, 2006 1:23 PM

  Some of the Rock Island's problems go way back to the late 1800s when the railroad was expanding.   For a time, one of the RI's presidents (Tracy, I think) was also at the same time, an officer on the CNW.  Some investors were involved in both lines. The RI was initially ahead in building across Iowa.  It stalled out and the CNW beat them to Council Bluffs by about 2 years.

 Later on, during the time of the Cable ( I think) presidency, the railroad stopped acquiring land for industrial development. During his time the RI  leased it's way into many major citys via trackage rights instead of building their own line. His idea was for the RI to be a bridge line. Let other carriers do the terminal switching and switch the loads to the RI for line haul.  I think that these actions came back to haunt the railroad in the later years. 

 I think one of the few good periods of management were during the Farrington years, mid 1930s to the mid 1950s. When he retired, Jenks took over for a few years. When Jenks left, Farrington came back until a replacement could be found. Farrington died in early 1960s and I think with him the last chance for the RI to have survived on it's own.  It seems the next management teams were only focused on selling the property to someone else. 

 Even then, they focused too much on the UP/RI merger. When it started to drag, they should've looked for other options. They had convinced themselves it was the UP or nothing and nothing (except for some of the stock/bond holders) was what they got.

 Even if things had worked out differently, the RI would've eventually wound up as part of someone else, probably the UP.  I see that Trains places the RI in the UP family tree. That's not true. The UP wound up with much of the RI's surviving mains, but thru acquiring the SP/SSW, MKT and CNW. The RI corporate structure eventually went to Maytag. Sadly, I'll never see a RI heriage unit. I guess the passenger engines Dan Sabin's Iowa Northern  acquired for the Hawkeye Express football trains is as close as it comes.

  Jeff        

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Antioch, IL
  • 4,371 posts
Posted by greyhounds on Monday, July 17, 2006 10:44 AM

Just as perspective ---

When the UP went to the Government Regulators to get the OK to take over the Rock Island it was in pretty good shape and was the UP's first choice of a route to get Chicago access - that was when I was in the 6th grade.

When the regulators finally made a decision I was in graduate school.

And that time included two years service to Uncle Sam before grad school.

It was a bad joke.   

 

"By many measures, the U.S. freight rail system is the safest, most efficient and cost effective in the world." - Federal Railroad Administration, October, 2009. I'm just your average, everyday, uncivilized howling "anti-government" critic of mass government expenditures for "High Speed Rail" in the US. And I'm gosh darn proud of that.
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Valparaiso, In
  • 5,921 posts
Posted by MP173 on Monday, July 17, 2006 9:44 AM
Andrew:

Lots of good comments here about why the Rock Island failed.  I really dont have too much to add to it except that the Crown family's interest has been and continues to be about the CROWN FAMILY.  No surprize there.  It should be, as should be all of our interests. 

Lets face it, the Rock was a weak railroad.  It didnt have a strong franchise on much...perhaps it's route structure in Chicago (starting on the south side) gave it a head start going west.  It also generated some good traffic in the Muscatine, Iowa area, but for the most part there was nothing special.

Do a couple of things for yourself this summer.  First, purchase an old Official Guide.  You can get them on Ebay pretty cheap. Get one from the late 50's/early 60's and study the maps of the carriers.

Second go to your liabrary and check out Richard Saunder's books on mergers.  He covers the mergers of the railroads from about 1900 on to current.  Excellent reading.

ed


  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: New Brighton, Minnesota
  • 1,493 posts
Posted by wctransfer on Monday, July 17, 2006 9:03 AM
What was kind of neat about the whole thing, is that they kept an SW1500 and 3 GP9s around I believe, to move cars to the new owners, and start making deadlines and stuff. So after the Rock shut down, they were still working a little bit.

Heres a shot of what im talking about.

http://railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=145886

Alec
Check out my pics! [url="http://wctransfer.rrpicturearchives.net/"] http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=8714
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: MP 32.8
  • 769 posts
Posted by Kevin C. Smith on Monday, July 17, 2006 1:14 AM
Part of all the granger roads problems was that they were the middlemen between the western transcons that originated EB traffic and the eastern trunk lines that originated WB. The RI had some good routes, I believe-Chicago/Omaha was OK, Chicago/Tucumcari and Twin Cities/Kansas City were all viable, I think. A big problem was that their most likely connections really didn't have any compelling reason to use the RI. The CB&Q, being part of the Hill Lines had a pretty good presumption of traffic from the NP & GN. The Milwaukee Road built it's own Pacific Coast Extension to secure traffic (for those that haven't visited that thread lately, the wildfires have died down and there are some good discussions about line relocations now in progress). The UP scored by getting a settlement from the abortive Harriman Lines merger with SP in the 1910's by an agreement with SP to turn over 40% of their originating traffic from an area of northern California to UP for movement east, along with whatever traffic the UP gathered from it's Portland and Los Angeles lines (someone more familiar with that, please fill in the details/corrections for me-thanks!) UP could (and did) use the C&NW for it's Omaha/Chicago connection-eventually merging it into the UP-and SP used it's Cotton Belt route to get the long haul to St. Louis for eastern connections, giving those two lines steady traffic volumes. I seem to recall reading an estimate that perhaps 75% of RI's trackage is in use but for different owners. As a single system the CRI&P may have been an also ran but it apparantly had many good parts.
"Look at those high cars roll-finest sight in the world."
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, July 16, 2006 11:40 PM
As mentioned, the Midwest (Iowa, in particular) had WAY too many RRs.  The CRIPpled had too much competition, so it cut down on track maintinance, and trains slowed to a crawl, so, RI filed bankrupcy for the third and final time in 1975, and shut down in 79-80.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: DeKalb, IL
  • 145 posts
Posted by senshi on Sunday, July 16, 2006 8:15 PM
 route_rock wrote:

  Funny someone had to go but we still have the same ammounts of trackage. Lets see how many to Omaha in the 70s out of Chicago? C&NW, BN, RI, IC, Mil. Today UP,BNSF,IAIS,CN but no Mil? Seems all that redundant track is still there, kinda odd for that argument.



Adding my two cents.  The amount of trackage between Chicago and Omaha are only a part of it.  The Milwaukee was saddled with the the pacific extension that I think had a hand in starting the ball rolling toward the end.  The Rock just didn't fit well into many of the prefered routes in the 70's.  Also prt of it was who was running the road.  C&NW could have just as likely have been one to go under but got lucky with good leadership and the ability to eventually get into the Powder River area, which lead it to become part of UP eventually.  If UP had gone with the Rock a little earlier the C&NW route could have been the route of the IAIS.  Being in the wrong place at the wrong time in the 70's could very easily push t a railroad over the edge.

Go Huskies. Forward Together Forward

Fan of - C&NW - Milwaukee Road - CGW -

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Little Rock
  • 487 posts
Posted by One Track Mind on Sunday, July 16, 2006 8:15 PM
 Kinda figured I might have forgotten exactly what happened with that, (the ICC and UP in '75) so I used a ? there. Thanks for giving the correct information. I should be more careful.
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: MA
  • 562 posts
Posted by dmoore74 on Sunday, July 16, 2006 7:57 PM
 One Track Mind wrote:

Don't have the info right in front of me, so someone can correct me if I don't remember this exactly, but along with the "Rock Island was nothing but a poor man's Burlington" idea which has already been mentioned, there was also the problem of the Union Pacific wanting to acquire or merge with the Rock Island in 1964. When this happened, the RI management began what I believe is referred to as the deferred maintenance program...which if I recall was a theory of why spend money on the upkeep of the Rock Island when UP would sweep in eventually and let them spend the money needed to fix the tracks. Apparently no one foresaw that it would take the ICC (?) until 1975 (?) to deny the application, and by then the Rock Island was in a mess.

Add in an ill-fated image fixing problem, where ex-employees felt a lot of money was wasted on blue paint, a strike in 1979, the railroad industry as a whole was in a bit of a slump in the '70s and then here comes the oil crisis in 1979....too much to overcome. Like a previous poster said, someone had to go.

Actually the ICC approved UP's acquisition of the Rock Island in 1975 but UP backed out when they saw what condition the railroad was in by that time.  Eventually the UP got some big chunks of the Rock Island  anyway when they merged the MKT, CNW and SP.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Crozet, VA
  • 1,049 posts
Posted by bobwilcox on Sunday, July 16, 2006 7:14 PM
If you do not think there were too many railroads in the Midwest take a look at a map.  Iowa say their mileage went from 7,731 in 1974 to 4,163 today. http://www.iowarail.com/industry/history.asp That is a drop of 46%!  Other states in the Midwest have had the same expierence.
Bob
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Over yonder by the roundhouse
  • 1,224 posts
Posted by route_rock on Sunday, July 16, 2006 5:59 PM

  Funny someone had to go but we still have the same ammounts of trackage. Lets see how many to Omaha in the 70s out of Chicago? C&NW, BN, RI, IC, Mil. Today UP,BNSF,IAIS,CN but no Mil? Seems all that redundant track is still there, kinda odd for that argument.

  The Rock went under for a number of reasons, and not only the Crowns but the wonderful BRAC strike and the Judge saying ( with money out being topped by money in and a list of assests not even looked at)well you cant reorganize.

   I know that if I work for a company with a Crown family member in it I would be looking for a new job. Guess who was on the board at Maytag in Galesburg. Old Henry's kid.Like worthless father like worthless son ( actually probably worth billions but you get my point)

Yes we are on time but this is yesterdays train

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Little Rock
  • 487 posts
Posted by One Track Mind on Sunday, July 16, 2006 5:01 PM

Don't have the info right in front of me, so someone can correct me if I don't remember this exactly, but along with the "Rock Island was nothing but a poor man's Burlington" idea which has already been mentioned, there was also the problem of the Union Pacific wanting to acquire or merge with the Rock Island in 1964. When this happened, the RI management began what I believe is referred to as the deferred maintenance program...which if I recall was a theory of why spend money on the upkeep of the Rock Island when UP would sweep in eventually and let them spend the money needed to fix the tracks. Apparently no one foresaw that it would take the ICC (?) until 1975 (?) to deny the application, and by then the Rock Island was in a mess.

Add in an ill-fated image fixing problem, where ex-employees felt a lot of money was wasted on blue paint, a strike in 1979, the railroad industry as a whole was in a bit of a slump in the '70s and then here comes the oil crisis in 1979....too much to overcome. Like a previous poster said, someone had to go.

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Chicago Subarbs
  • 638 posts
Posted by Glen Ellyn on Sunday, July 16, 2006 8:04 AM
Wow. I never knew that it was that complicated. And by complicated I mean I am a kid, and don't know alot about industry and trains yet. Wow.
Andrew Barchifowski, Glen Ellyn</font id="red">, LJ, #3300, Scott, FLODO.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Crozet, VA
  • 1,049 posts
Posted by bobwilcox on Sunday, July 16, 2006 7:51 AM
The Midwest simply had too many railroads.  The weakest of the weak got to disapear.  The Crown's control meant the CRIP paid the highest dividends in the railroad industry from 1955-1965 but never put a dime into locomotives or cars.
Bob
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Sunday, July 16, 2006 6:47 AM

The old cliche that said the Rock Island went to all the same places as the Burlington but the long way around has more than a little truth to it.  The Rock Island was never financially strong and in the postwar merger era it seemed more interested in staying alive until somebody else picked it up.  One could describe it as the Erie Lackawanna of the Midwest.

Among many fans in the Chicago area, the Crown family is considered one of the villains in the final collapse of the Rock Island as a railroad.  The family was a major bondholder and pushed long and hard for liquidation to get their money back.  Bondholders are secured creditors so they are first in line in a bankruptcy liquidation.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, July 15, 2006 10:26 PM
In Two words... No dice!
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Chicago Subarbs
  • 638 posts
What happened to The Rock Island?
Posted by Glen Ellyn on Saturday, July 15, 2006 9:50 PM
What happened to The Rock Island?
Andrew Barchifowski, Glen Ellyn</font id="red">, LJ, #3300, Scott, FLODO.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy