Trains.com

Grade Separations

966 views
2 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Saturday, September 13, 2003 10:34 AM
The same problem exists with the proposals on the Southwest Side such as 63rd St on the BRC 59th St Line and several proposals along the IHB. The one proposal that looks impossible is the flyover at Belt Junction for the Metra Southwest Service over the BRC.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Saturday, September 13, 2003 10:34 AM
The same problem exists with the proposals on the Southwest Side such as 63rd St on the BRC 59th St Line and several proposals along the IHB. The one proposal that looks impossible is the flyover at Belt Junction for the Metra Southwest Service over the BRC.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:08 AM
If grade-separation projects I've seen in the past are any indication, don't expect trivial details such as existing buildings to stand in the way. I'm sure 31st Street will be put over the tracks, much like Cermak is. And I wouldn't be surprised to see some easing of the curves in connection with the 47th Street project (how could you do 47th without doing East Avenue too?).

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:08 AM
If grade-separation projects I've seen in the past are any indication, don't expect trivial details such as existing buildings to stand in the way. I'm sure 31st Street will be put over the tracks, much like Cermak is. And I wouldn't be surprised to see some easing of the curves in connection with the 47th Street project (how could you do 47th without doing East Avenue too?).

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Grade Separations
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 28, 2003 6:03 AM
The Sept. issue of Trains mentions new grade separations for IHB at 31St. LaGrange, IL and 47 th. St., and BNSF at Maple Ave., Brookfield, IL. plus others. Exactly what is planned for these separations. I live here and hard to imagine what might be done. IHB at 31St. is a problem as may get 'stuck' by as many as 3 5/15 mph trains at crossing at one time. Thanks for your reply.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Grade Separations
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 28, 2003 6:03 AM
The Sept. issue of Trains mentions new grade separations for IHB at 31St. LaGrange, IL and 47 th. St., and BNSF at Maple Ave., Brookfield, IL. plus others. Exactly what is planned for these separations. I live here and hard to imagine what might be done. IHB at 31St. is a problem as may get 'stuck' by as many as 3 5/15 mph trains at crossing at one time. Thanks for your reply.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy