Trains.com

Control stands on CN SD70M-2's

6456 views
23 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: My Old Kentucky Home
  • 599 posts
Posted by mackb4 on Tuesday, January 20, 2009 9:52 PM

NS SD70M-2 INSIDE CAB VIEW     Although I've not ran a CN SD70M-2,here is a picture of the Engineers's control stand I took of the first NS SD70M-2 I operated.

 

         

Collin ,operator of the " Eastern Kentucky & Ohio R.R."

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,103 posts
Posted by ValleyX on Tuesday, January 20, 2009 9:44 PM

It's always funny to see a topic this old that someone has dredged up deep from the depths of the forums and surprising when you see that you were one of the responders.

And everything I abhorred about desktop controls still stands. 

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Sold Soul to North Shore Scenic Railroad for labor
  • 379 posts
Posted by nssr9169 on Monday, January 19, 2009 12:22 PM

tormadel
did crews not like the desktop arrangement?

 

They were knee knockers and uncomfortable

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Chelan County Washington
  • 15 posts
Posted by BNSF2828 on Monday, January 19, 2009 8:22 AM
I saw a BNSF Freight with 15 cars and a lone GP60M runing long hood first at 40MPH how would the engineer do this? GP60M,s have desktop controls.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 319 posts
Posted by sanvtoman on Wednesday, April 5, 2006 2:34 PM
I think Doug Harrop also wrote about no leg room with desk type controls.
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • 60 posts
Posted by cprs8622 on Tuesday, April 4, 2006 10:47 PM
Almost all CN locos are teh standing AAR cab minus the SD60/50. The Dash 8-40CM I think are desk top as well... The first order of Dash 9, were Dash 9-CWL correct, and thse 25 locos have desk top as well but the others have the standard.
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,103 posts
Posted by ValleyX on Monday, April 3, 2006 8:41 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by farmer03

Aren't there any adjustment to the seats? No up/down, side to side, back and forth?


The underside of the desk isn't L shaped, it's at a 45 degree angle, for who knows what reason, get the seat too far away and you're always reaching, get it too close and there's no room for your knees. I can't emphatically state just how much I dislike these units and how grateful I am that I don't have to run them EVERY trip.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, April 3, 2006 11:32 AM
Aren't there any adjustment to the seats? No up/down, side to side, back and forth?
  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: Milwaukee, WI, US
  • 1,384 posts
Posted by fuzzybroken on Monday, April 3, 2006 11:13 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Saxman

The Dash 9's that are lettered for the IC are ex LMS units that under a lease agreement spent six months on the CN and the other six months on Conrail prior to the splitting up of Conrail.

The LMS units (Blue Boats?) are actually Dash 8-40CWs (IC 2455-2466). CN has also lettered some of a new order of Dash 9-44CWs for Illinois Central (IC 2697-2726).
-Fuzzy Fuzzy World 3
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Monday, April 3, 2006 10:54 AM
I've met a few engineers. Most seem to like the AAR style conventional control stand. Years back one engineer in a magazine article referred to the desktop control as "Trolly Car Desk that gives you no room for your knees".

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,103 posts
Posted by ValleyX on Monday, April 3, 2006 10:48 AM
I despise desktop controls, they're uncomfortable, there is no way to get the proper distance from the seat to the desktop, the space for your legs isn't adequate, they're awkward to run, don't like the automatic or independent brake setup, I can't say enough bad about them.

Exabopper, I'll take a chance on accidentally sounding the whistle (and yes, I have had that happen), give me conventional controls every trip.
  • Member since
    May 2001
  • From: US
  • 158 posts
Posted by Saxman on Monday, April 3, 2006 8:22 AM
The Dash 9's that are lettered for the IC are ex LMS units that under a lease agreement spent six months on the CN and the other six months on Conrail prior to the splitting up of Conrail.

I have not been on any of the CN EMD or GE locomotives ( it will be a loooong time before we see them at Flat Rock, MI) but have operated the new NS, CSX and BNSF SD 70's and like the new control stand layout. I never have cared for the desk top. It is an absolute pain in the neck to run these backwards. I guess the designers of the desk top never "anticipated" the need to run the units backwards for any distance.

Saxman
  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: Milwaukee, WI, US
  • 1,384 posts
Posted by fuzzybroken on Monday, April 3, 2006 8:05 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by THayman

QUOTE: Originally posted by coborn35

Conventional is NOT what the C44-9W's have. They have DESKTOP.
The SD70M-2's, along with the ACe's, have the CONVENTIONAL control stand, like the SD40-2, but with minor adjustments. A guy i know who works for CN took a pic of the cab and its on rialpictures.net.


This might have been one of their aquired ex-Illinois Central units, because all of the Dash 9's actually built for CN were done with conventional control stands.

Illinois Central never had any Dash 9s before CN took over, so there wouldn't be any "ex-IC" Dash 9s...
-Fuzzy Fuzzy World 3
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Halifax, NS
  • 405 posts
Posted by THayman on Monday, April 3, 2006 7:07 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by coborn35

QUOTE: Originally posted by THayman

Do CN's SD70M-2's have conventional or desktop control stands?

I know the new ES44DC's have conventional stands, like the C44-9W's and SD70/75i locomotives before, but I have yet to see a cab shot of an SD70M-2.


Conventional is NOT what the C44-9W's have. They have DESKTOP.
The SD70M-2's, along with the ACe's, have the CONVENTIONAL control stand, like the SD40-2, but with minor adjustments. A guy i know who works for CN took a pic of the cab and its on rialpictures.net.


This might have been one of their aquired ex-Illinois Central units, because all of the Dash 9's actually built for CN were done with conventional control stands.

-Tim

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Sarnia, Ontario
  • 534 posts
Posted by ShaunCN on Saturday, March 11, 2006 3:33 PM
Cn's dash9's don't have desktops at all, they have they conventional style. i beleive the only ones that had the desktops on CN were the SD50F's and SD60F's.
derailment? what derailment? All reports of derailments are lies. Their are no derailments within a hundreed miles of here.
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Duluth,Minnesota,USA
  • 4,015 posts
Posted by coborn35 on Saturday, March 11, 2006 2:34 PM
QUOTE: I think if they made it so that you could move the control stand closer and farther away as needed, it would be a lot better (but that's my futuristic crazy talk, to be filed away along with my idea for remote-control helocopters with video to watch the opposite end of shove moves).

LOL Or have the chair slide up.

Mechanical Department  "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."

The Missabe Road: Safety First

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, March 11, 2006 12:36 PM
The conventional control stand (with the throttle/reverser mounted opposite the window instead of on the desktop) has not exactly gotten rave reviews. It allows better visibility when backing up, so it's good for yard switching, but it's rarely needed for road work, so the controls are in a more awkward position for your primary job (and on a widebody cab, rear visibility is not very good anyway). In general, the engineer's station is more cramped, and it's hard to get in and out of the seat without knocking against the controls (accidental horn sounding off is common).

I think if they made it so that you could move the control stand closer and farther away as needed, it would be a lot better (but that's my futuristic crazy talk, to be filed away along with my idea for remote-control helocopters with video to watch the opposite end of shove moves).
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Duluth,Minnesota,USA
  • 4,015 posts
Posted by coborn35 on Friday, March 3, 2006 7:09 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by THayman

Do CN's SD70M-2's have conventional or desktop control stands?

I know the new ES44DC's have conventional stands, like the C44-9W's and SD70/75i locomotives before, but I have yet to see a cab shot of an SD70M-2.


Conventional is NOT what the C44-9W's have. They have DESKTOP.
The SD70M-2's, along with the ACe's, have the CONVENTIONAL control stand, like the SD40-2, but with minor adjustments. A guy i know who works for CN took a pic of the cab and its on rialpictures.net.

Mechanical Department  "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."

The Missabe Road: Safety First

 

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Mesa, AZ
  • 778 posts
Posted by silicon212 on Friday, March 3, 2006 6:53 PM
It would seem that most engineers prefer the original AAR control stand to the desktop, at least according to some engineers on the UP...
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Appleton, WI
  • 275 posts
Posted by tormadel on Friday, March 3, 2006 2:10 PM
did crews not like the desktop arrangement?
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NW Wisconsin
  • 3,857 posts
Posted by beaulieu on Friday, March 3, 2006 12:42 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by trainboyH16-44

And when you say conventional, that means desktop, right?


No, it is a slightly modified version of the upright stand found on locomotives built prior to the introduction of the widenose cabs.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Mile 7.5 Laggan Sub., Great White North
  • 4,201 posts
Posted by trainboyH16-44 on Friday, March 3, 2006 12:21 PM
And when you say conventional, that means desktop, right?

Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296

Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NW Wisconsin
  • 3,857 posts
Posted by beaulieu on Friday, March 3, 2006 8:27 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by THayman

Do CN's SD70M-2's have conventional or desktop control stands?

I know the new ES44DC's have conventional stands, like the C44-9W's and SD70/75i locomotives before, but I have yet to see a cab shot of an SD70M-2.



They have a conventional control stand.
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Halifax, NS
  • 405 posts
Control stands on CN SD70M-2's
Posted by THayman on Friday, March 3, 2006 7:07 AM
Do CN's SD70M-2's have conventional or desktop control stands?

I know the new ES44DC's have conventional stands, like the C44-9W's and SD70/75i locomotives before, but I have yet to see a cab shot of an SD70M-2.

-Tim

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy