QUOTE: Originally posted by Sask_Tinplater I'm not an expert on this by any means, but I had always been under the impression that Canadian track standards were higher than US ones. The reason for this is because a couple of years ago CP was replacing the old ties on the line that runs through my town. When the workers stopped in the coffee shop some people asked them if it would be possible to buy the ties for their own uses. The response was that since US track standards are lower that CP sells their old ties to Amtrak. Anyone else hear of this? Like I say, I'm no expert on track regulations, but that's what was said. Perhaps the guy was even lying to get the people off his back or maybe regulations have changed since then? Tin Plate: Somebody's blowin smoke.....sometimes ties will get pulled from a main track in good shape, turned over and inserted in a backtrack, but that's about as far as it goes. Rule of thumb is if it isn't broken, excessively worn, holds a spike firmly, isn't plate cut and you can't see ballast working up through the tie, it's a servicable tie. Canada or US..... Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west Reply mudchicken Member sinceDecember 2001 From: Denver / La Junta 10,820 posts Posted by mudchicken on Friday, July 25, 2003 6:26 PM QUOTE: Originally posted by TARGUBRIGHT I am surprised Class 1's have there own Geometry cars. I would think they would want to subcontract that out. It would remove alot of the liablity off the railroad. TIM A Tim: If you just want to comply with the letter of the law, the contractor idea might work. The railroads have a vested interest in assessing the quality of the plant they own and they tend to test at a more resstrictive level than the FRA and they tend to test things outside the parameters of the 49CFR213 FRA standard. The other irony isd that the FRA's car is operated with a contractor (ENSCO) and past history (I can't speak for 1999 forward) is that the FRA car put out some rather questionable results (read the contractor's fault, not the FRA), especially when they still had "feelers" to measure gage. I personally witnessed an incident where the FRA T-2 car measured almost 200 miles of cross level defects that were not there including a claimed 5" cross level in a switch in tangent track that was in reality flat level. Remember also that the car is used as a maintenance planning tool and carries proprietary data that is unique to that railroad (i.e. - no two of these cars are even slightly similar and are in effect "custom built") Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west Reply Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 25, 2003 5:00 PM QUOTE: Originally posted by CShaveRR (If I remember correctly, CP got into trouble for using Canadian standards to maintain its U.S. track. If the AC line is bad by those standards, it must be really something to look at!) I'm not an expert on this by any means, but I had always been under the impression that Canadian track standards were higher than US ones. The reason for this is because a couple of years ago CP was replacing the old ties on the line that runs through my town. When the workers stopped in the coffee shop some people asked them if it would be possible to buy the ties for their own uses. The response was that since US track standards are lower that CP sells their old ties to Amtrak. Anyone else hear of this? Like I say, I'm no expert on track regulations, but that's what was said. Perhaps the guy was even lying to get the people off his back or maybe regulations have changed since then? Reply Edit Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 25, 2003 4:51 PM I am surprised Class 1's have there own Geometry cars. I would think they would want to subcontract that out. It would remove alot of the liablity off the railroad. TIM A Reply Edit mudchicken Member sinceDecember 2001 From: Denver / La Junta 10,820 posts Posted by mudchicken on Friday, July 25, 2003 3:58 PM FRA 213.9(a) its called "excepted track" (as in 49CFR213) If its only 20 pages, it's out of date, pre 6/9/2001. Also, railroads tend to do other measurements that are not in the book that tell managers different things. G-Cars also tend only to do main tracks and passing sidings, yards and backtracks are measured monthly on foot with hand tools. Have measured many tracks that look like hell, but still meet Class 1 or Class 2 criteria. The big issue is how the track behaves UNDER LOAD. (Transport Canada has its own similar version for north of the border) Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west Reply Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 25, 2003 3:09 PM Interesting reading is the pocket size 20 page "FRA Track Safety Standards" published by the Federal Railroad Administration. It lays out all the specs for rail which are measured by a geometry car. It is easy to see why a lot of track is Class 1. (Some I think should be Class 0, however, the classifications do not go that low). Reply Edit mudchicken Member sinceDecember 2001 From: Denver / La Junta 10,820 posts Posted by mudchicken on Thursday, June 26, 2003 5:14 PM Ed: Oh Ye great Uni-Head and operating wizard... With the exception of the ultrasonic rail detection part, you are on the money. Rail flaw detection (electromagnetic or ultrasonic) is the forte of the detector car (D-Car). The FRA and Class 1's all have track geometry cars. A very few others have them account of their costs to operate and maintain. There are also ride quality cars out there with accelerometers (sp?)that measure vertical and lateral forces on the railcars (we likened it to the "empty soda pop can on the dashboard" ride quality test). Each of the major railroads have their own cars and they all differ slightly. (most were recyled passenger or business cars plus Plasser makes a self-propelled unit. FRA/Amtrak's T-1000 is a Budd SPV-2000 (nice car with rather questionable/dubious equipment in the precision department)....Most cars squirt out a stream of colored grease or talcum powder AT TRACK SPEED when a defect is found... The cars used to have feelers to measure gauge, they now use focused light beams or other remote sensing technology (mind candy for us mudchickens)... Many of the railroad owned cars check against pre loaded railroad maps for locations of switches, crossings, bridges, curves, etc. in terms of location and if they are still in place as well as the geometry spec.s in 49CFR213. Many cars have video cameras and lite-slice (rail profile and corrugation [FOR calling out the rail grinder]) equipment on board. These cars are equipped with multiple high end computers,lasers, gyrocscopes and accelerometers to check the ride safety and ride quality of the main tracks and sidings (rarely, if ever, used in yards and backtracks)...railroads were using this stuff long before the highway people caught-on. Roadmasters and Engineering folks ride the cars determining what get fixed first and by who... Also causes great headaches in the maintenance budget and operating departments in terms getting the money to pay for fixing stuff and releasing slow orders.The cars generally are well stocked with food, drink (non-alcoholic) and industrial strength barrel of Excedrin/Tylenol/Aspirin for the roadmaster and Division Engineer.(suspect this is what killed off the Algoma toy trains up north for the season)... The cars results on a run often show where planned future maintenance work will happen and where a roadmaster needs to concentrate his efforts. (Now if we could train a few trainmasters,dispatchers, etc. why we can't lift slow orders and quit their whining, we might be able to fix some of the problems a little sooner)...If you realize also that these cars are usually ballasted heavy to create the most adverse conditions and measure at speeds over 60 MPH on the appropriately boarded track, then you begin to realize how advanced this technology and computer power is.... The GPR and cone penetrometer stuff usually is set on slower equipment and not on the geometry cars because of the stop & go nature of the beast. -mudchicken (uni-Head Ed Fan & One who has seen/ ridden many a G-Car...} ps: reserved a whole barrel of yellow grease for those rediculously defective M&M clowns.... Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west Reply Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, June 24, 2003 2:49 AM If I'm not mistaken, our geo test cars have hot box simulators to check the TWD accuracy. Ken Reply Edit wabash1 Member sinceApril 2001 From: US 2,849 posts Posted by wabash1 on Monday, June 23, 2003 4:24 PM ed is right and it mostly checks the rail if there is a defect in the rail. alignment and anything else that would couse a derailment. if the track has alignment problem it will couse the track to be reduced to a 25mph speed limit. if there is a bad section of rail it will be dropped to 25mph if it is real bad it is dropped to 10 mph. Reply Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 23, 2003 4:01 PM should you ever get out to Ca. the Ca. State RR museum in Old Sacramento, has an old sperry rail analysis car that used to belong to the UP. its not on display yet but it's stored in the old SP locomotive works marty,Ca Reply Edit edblysard Member sinceMarch 2002 9,265 posts Posted by edblysard on Monday, June 23, 2003 12:12 PM Geomerty Car is a fancy way of saying "rail inspection" car. It measures the guage of the rail, radius of curves, and uses ultrasonic technology to inspect the interior condition of the rail. It will also check super elevation, or lack of such. They look for wide guage track, gapped switch points at turnouts, rotted ties, insufficent ballast and loose or missing joint bars and sun kinks. It also checks the crown of the railhead, and looks for shelling inside the rail itself. Rail can look a-ok from the outside, but have a major defect inside. One of the major things they check is the elevation, or condition of the tracks. On tangent track, is the track level? Is there is a lot of dip or sag at joints, or curves whos radius exceeds certain specs without super-elevation,(outside rail higher than the inside)? Is the roadbed capable of holding the track structure in place at speed? If not, then the speed limit is lowered untill the problem is repaired. Thats just some of the things they check. I am sure I missed some, but rest assured someone will fill in the blanks. Stay Frosty, Ed 23 17 46 11 Reply GerFust Member sinceFebruary 2001 From: East Lansing, MI, US 223 posts Posted by GerFust on Monday, June 23, 2003 11:39 AM Carl: Thanks - that's much appreciated. The AC goes over some rough terrain and tall trestles, so perhaps they are extra cautious under those circumstances? Thanks, Jer [ ]===^=====xx o o O O O O o o The Northern-er (info on the layout, http://www.msu.edu/~fust/) Reply CShaveRR Member sinceJune 2001 From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois 13,681 posts Posted by CShaveRR on Monday, June 23, 2003 11:28 AM It would measure the gauge (distance between rails), vertical alignment (whether one rail is higher than the other at a given point... acceptable on superelevated curves but not elsewhere, and changes in those two measurements from point to point. (If I remember correctly, CP got into trouble for using Canadian standards to maintain its U.S. track. If the AC line is bad by those standards, it must be really something to look at!) Carl Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!) CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM) Reply GerFust Member sinceFebruary 2001 From: East Lansing, MI, US 223 posts Geometry Car Posted by GerFust on Monday, June 23, 2003 11:23 AM I was one of thousands of train excursionists that found out all too late last week that the Algoma Central Railroad had to suspend its Agawa Canyon Tour leaving from Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario. They cancelled the excursions because after an inspection by the government "Geometry Car" they had to lower speed limits to a crawl, unrealistically lengthening the round trip tour. MY QUESTION IS - what, specifically, does a geometry care measure when inspecting the track? [ ]===^=====xx o o O O O O o o The Northern-er (info on the layout, http://www.msu.edu/~fust/) Reply Join our Community! Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account. Login » Register » Search the Community Newsletter Sign-Up By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy More great sites from Kalmbach Media Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy
I'm not an expert on this by any means, but I had always been under the impression that Canadian track standards were higher than US ones. The reason for this is because a couple of years ago CP was replacing the old ties on the line that runs through my town. When the workers stopped in the coffee shop some people asked them if it would be possible to buy the ties for their own uses. The response was that since US track standards are lower that CP sells their old ties to Amtrak. Anyone else hear of this? Like I say, I'm no expert on track regulations, but that's what was said. Perhaps the guy was even lying to get the people off his back or maybe regulations have changed since then?
QUOTE: Originally posted by TARGUBRIGHT I am surprised Class 1's have there own Geometry cars. I would think they would want to subcontract that out. It would remove alot of the liablity off the railroad. TIM A
QUOTE: Originally posted by CShaveRR (If I remember correctly, CP got into trouble for using Canadian standards to maintain its U.S. track. If the AC line is bad by those standards, it must be really something to look at!)
23 17 46 11
Carl
Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)
CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.