Trains.com

BNSF Orders EMD SD70ACe's for 2006

4939 views
52 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Sacramento, California
  • 420 posts
Posted by SactoGuy188 on Wednesday, March 1, 2006 9:44 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie

I have commented to the Driver how bad the 9's and the AC4400's sound. I hope they hold together better than they sound to an amateur ear. They shake, they smoke, and they are just plain flat out noisy.


I've heard Dash 9-44CW's and AC4400CW's in SP service and the "chugging" sound from the prime mover is just flat-out weird compared to whine and roar of EMD 710 prime movers on SD70M's.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 1, 2006 9:28 PM
Didn't I read in TRAINS that BNSF ordered 350 locomotives from EMD?
  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Illinois
  • 484 posts
Posted by joegreen on Wednesday, March 1, 2006 10:58 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Swafford

After reviewing the Trains magazine April issue, it appears that BNSF has ordered 70 SD70Ace’s for 2006.
“While BNSF hasn’t said what models it will get, at least 70 are expected to be SD70ACe.

Best regards,
Swafford



They will be SD70ACe's, BNSF already announced it. They originally ordered 30 but uped the order
www.12ozprophet.com
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Wednesday, March 1, 2006 10:30 AM
I have commented to the Driver how bad the 9's and the AC4400's sound. I hope they hold together better than they sound to an amateur ear. They shake, they smoke, and they are just plain flat out noisy.

An observer.

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 1, 2006 9:25 AM
After reviewing the Trains magazine April issue, it appears that BNSF has ordered 70 SD70Ace’s for 2006.
“While BNSF hasn’t said what models it will get, at least 70 are expected to be SD70ACe.

Best regards,
Swafford
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, February 28, 2006 2:22 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by joegreen

QUOTE: Originally posted by rdganthracite

QUOTE: Originally posted by bnsfengineer

As a engineer I hate the GEVO, and for that fact I don't like and GE's. Take them all to the scrap yard. I have been running coal trains for 3 years now and GE just cannot do what GM does. The dash 9, AC4400cw, the GEVO all slip and slide all over the rails. The desk top shakes and you can barely hear yourself think. All I can say is junk, junk, junk. The brand new Gevo has one thing going for them and that is I like the cab set up as for the the control stand, but that is about it. I love running anything GM. I would take an SD40-2 or especially an old Oakway SD60 anyday. Now SD70Mac's are about the best engines ever built. I had moved 128 loaded coal cars with just one Mac and that engine did not know the word quit. I hope the SD70Ace is about the same.


I am not an engineer nor do I pretend to be. But what you say is exactly opposite of what the engineers I talk to on NS and CSX say. They detest the SD50s, SD60s, SD70s and SD70ACs as being extremely slippery on anything other than perfectly dry rail. I have been told several times that even the morning dew is enough to cause them to lose thier feet. Every one of the engineers I talk to prefer the newer GEs or the GP40-2 plus slug sets.


Remember BNSF and NS are different railroads.

If NS is having problems with the SD70M-2 then why did they order so many in the first place, and why did they order so many more after the first were delivered?


Yes, joegreen is correct that BNSF and NS are different railroads, but how many cars does NS run on their coal trains? BNSF is running trains with 135 cars, at 19 thousand tons with 1 and 1 dp. Now that is doing some pulling which the GE cannot do very well with out slipping. The Mac does a very good job for these types of trains and BNSF has started running 150 car trains to the Thomas Hill power plant in Missouri. These have been test trains that bnsf has ran a couple of times and only with Mac's for power.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, February 28, 2006 7:30 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by bnsfengineer

Yes, joegreen is correct that BNSF and NS are different railroads, but how many cars does NS run on their coal trains? BNSF is running trains with 135 cars, at 19 thousand tons with 1 and 1 dp. Now that is doing some pulling which the GE cannot do very well with out slipping. The Mac does a very good job for these types of trains and BNSF has started running 150 car trains to the Thomas Hill power plant in Missouri. These have been test trains that bnsf has ran a couple of times and only with Mac's for power.
SWEET! I love SD70MAC's.
  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Illinois
  • 484 posts
Posted by joegreen on Monday, February 27, 2006 1:26 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by rdganthracite

QUOTE: Originally posted by bnsfengineer

As a engineer I hate the GEVO, and for that fact I don't like and GE's. Take them all to the scrap yard. I have been running coal trains for 3 years now and GE just cannot do what GM does. The dash 9, AC4400cw, the GEVO all slip and slide all over the rails. The desk top shakes and you can barely hear yourself think. All I can say is junk, junk, junk. The brand new Gevo has one thing going for them and that is I like the cab set up as for the the control stand, but that is about it. I love running anything GM. I would take an SD40-2 or especially an old Oakway SD60 anyday. Now SD70Mac's are about the best engines ever built. I had moved 128 loaded coal cars with just one Mac and that engine did not know the word quit. I hope the SD70Ace is about the same.


I am not an engineer nor do I pretend to be. But what you say is exactly opposite of what the engineers I talk to on NS and CSX say. They detest the SD50s, SD60s, SD70s and SD70ACs as being extremely slippery on anything other than perfectly dry rail. I have been told several times that even the morning dew is enough to cause them to lose thier feet. Every one of the engineers I talk to prefer the newer GEs or the GP40-2 plus slug sets.


Remember BNSF and NS are different railroads.

If NS is having problems with the SD70M-2 then why did they order so many in the first place, and why did they order so many more after the first were delivered?
www.12ozprophet.com
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, February 27, 2006 10:31 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by bnsfengineer

As a engineer I hate the GEVO, and for that fact I don't like and GE's. Take them all to the scrap yard. I have been running coal trains for 3 years now and GE just cannot do what GM does. The dash 9, AC4400cw, the GEVO all slip and slide all over the rails. The desk top shakes and you can barely hear yourself think. All I can say is junk, junk, junk. The brand new Gevo has one thing going for them and that is I like the cab set up as for the the control stand, but that is about it. I love running anything GM. I would take an SD40-2 or especially an old Oakway SD60 anyday. Now SD70Mac's are about the best engines ever built. I had moved 128 loaded coal cars with just one Mac and that engine did not know the word quit. I hope the SD70Ace is about the same.


I am not an engineer nor do I pretend to be. But what you say is exactly opposite of what the engineers I talk to on NS and CSX say. They detest the SD50s, SD60s, SD70s and SD70ACs as being extremely slippery on anything other than perfectly dry rail. I have been told several times that even the morning dew is enough to cause them to lose thier feet. Every one of the engineers I talk to prefer the newer GEs or the GP40-2 plus slug sets.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, February 26, 2006 11:51 PM
*** that's impressive.. lol
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Chicago Subarbs
  • 638 posts
Posted by Glen Ellyn on Sunday, February 26, 2006 9:24 PM
I wonder what set it off. He propably flooded it. [;)]
Andrew Barchifowski, Glen Ellyn</font id="red">, LJ, #3300, Scott, FLODO.
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Maine,USA
  • 64 posts
Posted by CaptainChuck on Sunday, February 26, 2006 8:43 AM
haha watch this. Theres one commercial about harley davisons but after that theres a news clip of a BNSF unit on fire and exploding!
http://kshb.dayport.com/viewer/viewerpage.php?Art_ID=164750&Category_ID=5&tf=kshbviewer.tpl
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, February 25, 2006 5:16 PM
As a engineer I hate the GEVO, and for that fact I don't like and GE's. Take them all to the scrap yard. I have been running coal trains for 3 years now and GE just cannot do what GM does. The dash 9, AC4400cw, the GEVO all slip and slide all over the rails. The desk top shakes and you can barely hear yourself think. All I can say is junk, junk, junk. The brand new Gevo has one thing going for them and that is I like the cab set up as for the the control stand, but that is about it. I love running anything GM. I would take an SD40-2 or especially an old Oakway SD60 anyday. Now SD70Mac's are about the best engines ever built. I had moved 128 loaded coal cars with just one Mac and that engine did not know the word quit. I hope the SD70Ace is about the same.
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Chicago Subarbs
  • 638 posts
Posted by Glen Ellyn on Friday, February 24, 2006 7:28 PM
Just as long as they don't replace the BN SD70M that is hanging out here.
Andrew Barchifowski, Glen Ellyn</font id="red">, LJ, #3300, Scott, FLODO.
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Maine,USA
  • 64 posts
Posted by CaptainChuck on Friday, February 24, 2006 3:29 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Joby

QUOTE: Originally posted by farmer03

what was the reason for the alleged 'bad blood' between BNSF and EMD anyway? BN bought however many hundreds of sd70macs and the bulk of santa fe power was EMD. name change comes with an attitude change i guess.


Gm sold ALL autorack contracts west of the Mississippi to UP. BNSF returned the favor by not Purchasing any GM products. Now that Bombardier is n control of EMD, things might change.

Secondly, GE's are still the coolest. All you SD40 lovers want an universal engine again to be from EMD. Personally, I'll always liked U-Boats and ALCOs way more, but that's me. MORAL of the Story: GE is the best

Especially when they catch fire, thats when GE's are the coolest [:D]
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 71 posts
Posted by Valleyline on Thursday, February 23, 2006 6:59 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by arbfbe

The GE's, they can be called roaches. They are everywhere and you just can't get rid of them.

BNSF 5525 had a turbo charger over run last night. It took 45 minutes to burn out all the crankcase oil. What a show. Sparks out the stack for 25' in all directions, flames for 30'-50' straight out the stack. Best 4th of July fountain display I have ever seen. I am glad there was snow on the ground and not extreme fire danger in the forest.

Just another reason to go 2 cycle.


Hmmmmmm......45 minutes. One would think it might have been appropriate to shut down the unit.
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • 33 posts
Posted by Joby on Thursday, February 23, 2006 2:44 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by bnsfkline

Price shouldn't be the matter in what builder a railroad buys from. It should be the quality. EMD has had a history of putting out quality locomotives. They have had more locomotive models go over the 1,000 mark, and a few gove over the 2,000 mark, and one gone over the 4,000 (SD40 Series) mark in total production.

GE has had only 5 models hit the 1,000 mark and only 2 over the 2,000 mark. That goes to show that EMD know what they are doing.


You can't really argue with the quality of the 40's. However, when EMD was still asking for an unbelievable price for SD50's, Railroads turned to GE. The -8 set the standard, and EMD has been playing catch-up ever since.

The reason less GE's are sold is that a Railroad needs less to do the same job (hp increase). Also, deregulation allowed railroads to maximize the usefullness of one locomotive, and the newer locomotives (generally) need less maintenance. Finally, during the SD40's boring, dry, and unprecedented run at the top, EMD was basically holding railroads hostage. Except for a few exceptions, such as SP's U33C's, EMD had the market bought and paid for. And Even though the economy was in a recession, railroads needed large amounts of engines to replace F units, SD9s, and ALCO's. Which is why it was nice when those wide nosed -8's/9's broadsided EMD
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • 33 posts
Posted by Joby on Thursday, February 23, 2006 2:31 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by farmer03

what was the reason for the alleged 'bad blood' between BNSF and EMD anyway? BN bought however many hundreds of sd70macs and the bulk of santa fe power was EMD. name change comes with an attitude change i guess.


Gm sold ALL autorack contracts west of the Mississippi to UP. BNSF returned the favor by not Purchasing any GM products. Now that Bombardier is n control of EMD, things might change.

Secondly, GE's are still the coolest. All you SD40 lovers want an universal engine again to be from EMD. Personally, I'll always liked U-Boats and ALCOs way more, but that's me. MORAL of the Story: GE is the best
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, February 23, 2006 1:25 AM
He's not suggesting that BNSF is considering retiring them, but the older ones day's of pulling top assignments are probably limited. They're getting up there for important heavy haul coal trains and such. I imagine stuff like these new SD70ACe's will bump some of the older 70MAC's to new assignments.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, February 22, 2006 9:43 PM
Even if they were only 15 y/o BNSF would rebuild them. They're even rebuilding old SD40-2's.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, February 22, 2006 8:56 PM
Mr. Benton,
The SD70MAC's are only 9-12 Years old depending on delieverly dates.

QUOTE: Originally posted by edbenton

Also remember those first 70MAC's are also 15 years old and maybe BNSF is looking for a replacement for them. 15 years of pulling max weight and maxpower on grades will wear out an engine regardless of who made it. There are fleets out there in the trucking feild they are replaced every 2-3 years just do to the wear from the mountains. try having only 12000 hp remember the first sd70's only had 4000 hp and pulling crawford hill or other grades like that.
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: Stevens Point
  • 436 posts
Posted by AlcoRS11Nut on Wednesday, February 22, 2006 8:15 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by UPTRAIN

They need some, lol. Spice up that wastepool of GE's.


exactly!!!!!!
I love the smell of ALCo smoke in the Morning. "Long live the 251!!!" I miss the GBW and my favorite uncle is Uncle Pete. Uncle Pete eats Space Noodles for breakfast.
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • 7,968 posts
Posted by K. P. Harrier on Wednesday, February 22, 2006 8:04 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by rrnut282

QUOTE: Originally posted by arbfbe


Just another reason to go 2 cycle.


I thought both GE and EMD went to 4-cycle prime movers to meet Tier2 regulations.


Nope. EMD dabbled in four-cycle, but still uses two as its standard. Proof is in the sound -- SD70ACe's don't chug ...

K.P.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- K.P.’s absolute “theorem” from early, early childhood that he has seen over and over and over again: Those that CAUSE a problem in the first place will act the most violently if questioned or exposed.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, February 21, 2006 6:32 PM
QUOTE: Dingoix you goof. I still like my Athearn H1 GP38-2's. Your realy hooked on those H3's arn't you? Allan.
sure am. H1 is fine, but H3 is so much better.
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: MP CF161.6 NS's New Castle District in NE Indiana
  • 2,148 posts
Posted by rrnut282 on Tuesday, February 21, 2006 11:38 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by arbfbe


Just another reason to go 2 cycle.


I thought both GE and EMD went to 4-cycle prime movers to meet Tier2 regulations.
Mike (2-8-2)
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Back home on the Chi to KC racetrack
  • 2,011 posts
Posted by edbenton on Tuesday, February 21, 2006 11:11 AM
Also remember those first 70MAC's are also 15 years old and maybe BNSF is looking for a replacement for them. 15 years of pulling max weight and maxpower on grades will wear out an engine regardless of who made it. There are fleets out there in the trucking feild they are replaced every 2-3 years just do to the wear from the mountains. try having only 12000 hp remember the first sd70's only had 4000 hp and pulling crawford hill or other grades like that.
Always at war with those that think OTR trucking is EASY.
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Maine,USA
  • 64 posts
Posted by CaptainChuck on Tuesday, February 21, 2006 8:26 AM
I really havent looked through this entire thread but what is the time period inwhich these units will be delivered?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, February 20, 2006 6:56 PM
From what I have heard BNSF isn't happy with the some of the GEVO's functions like the DPU System.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, February 20, 2006 5:52 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dingoix

QUOTE: BNSF will be getting these 30 SD70ACe's in H3, just as the 40 new GP38-2's from NRE will too.
YES!!!! H3 GP38-2's!!!

Dingoix you goof[;)]. I still like my Athearn H1 GP38-2's. Your realy hooked on those H3's arn't you? Allan.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy