Trains.com

Making tracks...

1339 views
22 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 7, 2005 12:35 PM
Thanks for the 411 Mud. When I was cut off a few years ago, I spoke to R&R about wprking there during my furlough. Those guys acted like they were a class 1. I thought about asking them if they use a Tyco or Lionel power box to power their little toy RR. I also rode the RGCX, one great way to see the Gorge! Holy cow! Whomever was running ran like crap. I mean, I have been with student engineers in undulating terrain on a 17,000 ton coal drag that ran less lumpy than that. All that I can say is that the Automatic is your friend....fear the independant brake!
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Monday, December 5, 2005 11:43 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by ironken

Originally posted by Big_Boy_4005

Mud...what's the deal on the line between Pueblo and Canon City. Who's is it? UP, BNSF,Rock-n-rail,CCRG? I have seen Rock-n-Rails motors on the joint line between Pueblo and Springs. Can their crews run on that line or is it UP's or BNSF's crews?


Get your scorecard out IronKen:

BNSF leased all and later sold all of its holdings to RRRR/RGCX between Canon Jcn. in Pueblo to end of the line in Canon City. (incredibly poor job by BNSF Asset Management and their attorneys...they failed to contact the people who actually knew what was what out there in the engineering departments - really a botched deal)

UP sold to RRRR/RGCXfrom 9th St. Canon City ,thru the Royal Gorge to Parkdale while retaining trackage rights later (almost as bad a goof as BNSF's) and still maintaaining signal and dispatch responsibilities.

After the 1923 flood, the parallell ATSF and DRGW lines were merged into a joint line containing the best main track segments of each with DRGW controlling the main. ATSF got trackage rights to reach it's "islands" at Prtland, Canon City, Rockvale Branch and Cotter Spur out of Canon City. . (RRRR /RGCX got those trackage rights)

RRRR constantly goes broke and changes owners. (Railroad isn't losing $$$$, but the aggregate mines do due to really poor management) RGCX and RRRR really don't like one another and FRA has had to step in and play referee more than once.

Both RRRR and RGCX need to be taken out behind the woodshed and whomped-on. Both are classic lessons on how not to operate, maintain and inspect a railroad. What a sorry mess.[V][V][V]
Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    April 2002
  • From: Northern Florida
  • 1,429 posts
Posted by SALfan on Monday, December 5, 2005 11:00 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by mudchicken

Carl: I had a foreman (now an Asst. Rdm.) who was 6'-10" 360bs.....spikes jumped into the ties out of self defence and/or fear.



Bet that guy didn't have to put up with any lip from the crew he supervised . . . . or the people who supervised HIM.
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 2,593 posts
Posted by PNWRMNM on Monday, December 5, 2005 10:44 AM
Erik,

It was the CP crew that laid just over 10 miles of track in a day. Yes, that record still stands.

Mac
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Monday, December 5, 2005 7:07 AM
I think with the advent of panel track, and a good logistics manager, ten miles in a day is quite possible....but the budget guys would like it!

MOW might be the most under appreciated guys on the road, it all starts with
the quality of what they do.

For my money, tie plates, with the plate screws and Pandrol clips looks like the way to go...exactly what they show in the photo in Trains.
Holds the track in gauge, and doesn’t seem to work loose like spikes.
Not as fast as a good spike gang, but it looks a lot more durable.

Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, December 5, 2005 6:38 AM
Ed, thanks for the links. It's nice to know that automation hasn't taken over all the trades in railroading. Still, track laying and alignment looks like a miserable job... it just takes less people to do it.

One of the accomplishments that was highly touted on the UP-CP first transcon was the ability of a UP crew to lay ten miles of track in one day. Does that record still stand? What is the average amount of rail laid in one day nowadays? And how many people actually make up a rail laying crew?

Erik
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Southern Region now, UK
  • 820 posts
Posted by Hugh Jampton on Monday, December 5, 2005 6:10 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by mudchicken

(3) The mechanical engineers have yet to come up with an effective pandrol setter, but no-one has it right yet (too many variables, esp. capturing the loose pandrol pretzel clip). The skill sets required to be a good trackman are more than most understand.


<insert a load of them WTF smilies here please>

I can't believe that pan pullers have yet to cross the Atlantic.
Have a look at http://www.rotamag.co.uk/page2.htm There's some down the page a bit, I've used them and you get the hang of it quite quickly,, and they're safer than whackin them with a BFH.
The only problem is that a different one is neede for each type of clip, and some need both a setter and a puller..
Generally a lurker by nature

Be Alert
The world needs more lerts.

It's the 3rd rail that makes the difference.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, December 5, 2005 2:19 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Big_Boy_4005

MC, It must be the lag bolt driver in the photo. If you look closely, there is some sawdust on the tops of the ties. They must have predrilled them a little to make them go in a little easier. There were pallets of plates and buckets of bolts as well as lots of other parts at the sight.

As for the greenhorn, I didn't see him break any handles, but the clip went flying a few times before he got it started.[swg]


Big boy, they are called screw spikes. When building T/Os, you pre drill the ties after the tie plates and rail are down, then drive the spikes. The spreads/gage all have to be in tolerance, so you have to be accurate. I have put a bunch of screw spikes into ties and am glad to say that it has been a few years since I had to earn my money like that. Try looking up Geismar if you are further interested in this machinery. Mud......do you have anymore to add? P.S. Mud...what's the deal on the line between Pueblo and Canon City. Who's is it? UP, BNSF,Rock-n-rail,CCRG? I have seen Rock-n-Rails motors on the joint line between Pueblo and Springs. Can their crews run on that line or is it UP's or BNSF's crews?
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Sunday, December 4, 2005 10:17 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by espeefoamer

QUOTE: Originally posted by ChuckCobleigh

QUOTE: Originally posted by erikthered

There was also a figure thrown out of 11,000 tons of rails being manufactured. How much track, in length, is that?

Erik


11,000 tons of 150 pound rail works out to about 83 miles of rail or 41+ miles of track.



The heaviest rail I ever heard of was some 144 # rail the PRR used over the alleghennies back around WW2.


Try PRR/Lackawanna 157 # Rail (then visualize 90# rail welded to it which is a really strange sight)...there is 175# thick web crane rail out there now as well)
Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Sunday, December 4, 2005 8:26 PM
Sarah...That is the NS here in Muncie that I note of the Pandrol clips also....Also along with them the tie plates are bolted and some are spiked.....

Quentin

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Sunday, December 4, 2005 7:13 PM
MC, It must be the lag bolt driver in the photo. If you look closely, there is some sawdust on the tops of the ties. They must have predrilled them a little to make them go in a little easier. There were pallets of plates and buckets of bolts as well as lots of other parts at the sight.

As for the greenhorn, I didn't see him break any handles, but the clip went flying a few times before he got it started.[swg]
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Rockton, IL
  • 4,821 posts
Posted by jeaton on Sunday, December 4, 2005 5:53 PM
10,000 tons or 80-some miles of new rail sure doesn't sound like very much. Was that supposed to be for just one project, one railroad or nationwide? (My January Trains has not yet arrived.)

Jay

"We have met the enemy and he is us." Pogo Possum "We have met the anemone... and he is Russ." Bucky Katt "Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." Niels Bohr, Nobel laureate in physics

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Sunday, December 4, 2005 5:39 PM
Erik,
Here is a link for Pandrol clips, scroll down to see the common application used here in the US...
http://www.pandrol.com/cstudies/c35_bdy.htm

http://www.pandroluk.com/casestudies/prj31_bdy.htm

Tried to "drive" one in a few days ago, Mudchicken is right, looks easy, but really requires a lot more skill than you think.

Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Sunday, December 4, 2005 5:32 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by ChuckCobleigh

QUOTE: Originally posted by erikthered

There was also a figure thrown out of 11,000 tons of rails being manufactured. How much track, in length, is that?

Erik


11,000 tons of 150 pound rail works out to about 83 miles of rail or 41+ miles of track.



The heaviest rail I ever heard of was some 144 # rail the PRR used over the alleghennies back around WW2.
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Sunday, December 4, 2005 4:57 PM
Sarah: that thing you have lying around the house is a rail anchor (which does not fasten the rail to the tie; it just pushes against the tie to keep the tie from skewing and the rail from running accross the tie plate)

The machine is actually two hydraulic lag-screw drivers (Screw applicator), spike puller or hairpin pullers (can't see the actual workhead behind the rail)

Erik: (1) Keep it simple, (2) setting a pandrol clip is easy compared to diving a spike (and you do not want to overdrive a pandrol and (3) The mechanical engineers have yet to come up with an effective pandrol setter, but no-one has it right yet (too many variables, esp. capturing the loose pandrol pretzel clip). The skill sets required to be a good trackman are more than most understand.

Carl: I had a foreman (now an Asst. Rdm.) who was 6'-10" 360bs.....spikes jumped into the ties out of self defence and/or fear.

BigBoy: How many maul handles did the greenhorn newbie break?
Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Louisville, KY
  • 1,345 posts
Posted by CSXrules4eva on Sunday, December 4, 2005 2:50 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by CShaveRR

You should see a pair of experienced section men driving a spike. Takes only a couple of seconds--not only do they hit it every time, but they manage to keep the hammers out of each other's way.


That sort of reminds me of some of the guys at my job driving a broken axle out of the rear of a truck. I'd rather see the section men though. lol

Modelcar, over here Septa (Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority) uses nothing but clips on all their mainlines to attach the rails to the ties. I have occasionally seen another method of holding the rail to the tie with the use of some kind of clamp (I have one lying around the house somewere) that you put undeneath the rail, or something like that I don't know the techical term for it but, I do know that NS loves this method of rail attachment on all of their former Conrail lines in PA.
LORD HELP US ALL TO BE ORIGINAL AND NOT CRISPY!!! please? Sarah J.M. Warner conductor CSX
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Sunday, December 4, 2005 11:57 AM
You should see a pair of experienced section men driving a spike. Takes only a couple of seconds--not only do they hit it every time, but they manage to keep the hammers out of each other's way.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Sunday, December 4, 2005 10:59 AM
....Those clips are in use on wood ties too......

Quentin

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Sunny (mostly) San Diego
  • 1,919 posts
Posted by ChuckCobleigh on Sunday, December 4, 2005 10:57 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by erikthered

There was also a figure thrown out of 11,000 tons of rails being manufactured. How much track, in length, is that?

Erik


11,000 tons of 150 pound rail works out to about 83 miles of rail or 41+ miles of track.

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Sunday, December 4, 2005 9:58 AM
Well Erik, when I took that photo, there was a crew building a switch that was eventually lifted into place. Obviously switch construction is hand work. I wouldn't be at all surprised if there was an automated method for doing that on normal track.

While I was watching, there was this one guy who just couldn't hit the clip. It took him like four tries just to hit it. Most of the other guys could get them set in a couple of swings. [swg]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, December 4, 2005 8:33 AM
Yep, those are the clips I'm talking about.

I'm surprised with all the machinery used in laying track that something as mundane as a sledge hammer would be used to install these clips. Next thing you know, we will be bringing back gandy dancers and John Henry.

Erik
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Sunday, December 4, 2005 8:06 AM
As far as I know railroads still use spikes on most of their track.

Are these the clips you are talking about? This gizmo, I believe, is a drill, or else it is a device for screwing in long lag bolts, which hold the special plates to the ties. The clips are driven in from the side with a sledge hammer. I think these clips are used on concrete ties. Spring tension in the clip is what holds the rail down.



Rail is measured in pounds per yard, and comes in different sizes. My guess is that most rail produced today is for mainline replacement, meaning 100 pounds plus per yard. The math is simple once you know size being produced.

Hope this answer holds you over til Mud Chicken gets here.[;)]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Making tracks...
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, December 4, 2005 7:24 AM
The latest TRAINS had an article on composite ties. I actually have seen some concrete ties in the middle of nowhere in Georgia...

I noticed that there is a new (to me, anyway) way of attaching the rails to the ties. It looks like some kind of clip arrangement.

Which leads to the question. Do railroads use spikes any more? Who makes them?

There was also a figure thrown out of 11,000 tons of rails being manufactured. How much track, in length, is that?

Erik

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy