Trains.com

Modern Steam

687 views
6 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Modern Steam
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 8, 2003 2:45 PM
Some years back, I saw a photo of an experimental steam locomotive some company was trying out. Apart from the cylinders and connecting rods on the wheels it actually looked like a diesel in body. Does anyone know what ever happened to it? How the tests worked out?
Pop
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 8, 2003 6:57 PM
Sir, If you can give us an around date I have some reference books I can check.
TIM ARGUBRIGHT
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 8, 2003 9:33 PM
I can't really recall offhand, I think it could have been something in the middle eighties but I'm really not sure.
Pop
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Tuesday, April 8, 2003 9:53 PM
Sounds like you're talking about the "ACE 3000". Never got past testing a few components in former C&O 4-8-4 614. Financial support didn't materialize. Check early and mid-1980s. ACE=American Coal Enterprises.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Seattle
  • 36 posts
Posted by rrbrewer on Tuesday, April 8, 2003 11:56 PM
I agree, it probably was the ACE 3000. Check out

http://www.trainweb.org/tusp/ace_det.html

For details and a shop drawing

RRB
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Milwaukee WI (Fox Point)
  • 11,428 posts
Posted by dknelson on Wednesday, April 9, 2003 8:22 AM
I recall seeing a photo of a frame with drivers in Railroad/Railfan. Model Railroader, I think, published drawings of the proposed prototype.
Dave Nelson
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 9, 2003 10:02 PM
Thanks for the info guys, that was the loco I was thinking about. It seems to have had a lot going for it, I wonder why it wasn't pushed further.
Pop

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy