Trains.com

Trains Magazine

761 views
11 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 8:15 AM
Modelcar is right, one just does not throw away an issue of TRAINS magazine. I held on to the very first issue I ever purchased (July 1965) even after it was battered beyond belief and threw it out only after I was able to obtain a replacement copy at a swap session.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 12:33 AM
It was up to $75.00 when I scraped that together and took the plunge (rough for a college kid who paid his own way). At the time (I might have been about 20), I figured that I'd have it "paid off" at about 34, compared to the then-current three-year subscription price ($18.00). With a two-year subscription now costing $79.95, I go through another lifetime every 24 months or so.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: SIOUX FALLS, SOUTH DAKOTA
  • 2,483 posts
Posted by CANADIANPACIFIC2816 on Monday, September 12, 2005 5:49 PM
While I am not a lifetime subscriber of Trains Magazine, I certainly have a large collection of back issues from the last thirty years. I only wi***hat the publisher of Trains would go back to using the old familiar, traditional masthead. TRAINS splashed diagonally across the front cover just donesn't cut it with me.

Ray Loftesness II
CANADIANPACIFIC2816
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Monday, September 12, 2005 11:53 AM
$60 [:O] even after adjusting for inflation that would be a no brainer !!!!!!
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Monday, September 12, 2005 11:41 AM
I don't have continous years back in history of TRAINS but I have many, many years of them.....The problem is where to keep them....One just does not through away a TRAINS magazine. Have Railroad magazines, some back in the mid 40's. They sure had some good human interest railroad stories and great drawings in them...One can look in one of them and REALLY see how much railroading has changed.
....I had never heard of the lifetime subscription {TRAINS}, before....I could have been temped with that. What a savings that would have been.

Quentin

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Crozet, VA
  • 1,049 posts
Posted by bobwilcox on Monday, September 12, 2005 11:29 AM
As I recall, forty years ago it was $60. To bad I didn't have the good sense to take Kalmbach up on the deal!
Bob
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Monday, September 12, 2005 11:06 AM
Interesting. I never heard of this before. I would like to know what it cost to be a lifetimer.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NE Oklahoma
  • 287 posts
Posted by richardy on Monday, September 12, 2005 10:31 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by CShaveRR


By the way...I'm one of 'em! Got in within a year of the time the curtain fell. That was over 30 years ago.


CS:

Do you remember what the cost for a lifetime versus an annual susscription was at that time?

Richard
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Monday, September 12, 2005 9:50 AM
I have it from a good source that the Lifetime subscribers to Trains will be mentioned in some way in the November issue.

By the way...I'm one of 'em! Got in within a year of the time the curtain fell. That was over 30 years ago.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, September 11, 2005 8:35 PM
Well, the first Trains I purchased was in a newsstand in Speculator New York. around 1960. It had a neat article about the KATY -- and I turned in enough deposit bottles to subscribe ASAP. And so I have that pile going back 45 years as a subscriber (35 as a Lifetime subscriber -- a category not offered in almost as many years).

I have also collected backwards -- complete to 1946 and most issues back to Vol 1 #2.

I also have MRs from 1947 until about 1970 (when I decided the 1'=1' was more my interest; also RMC, Model Trains, the "old" Toy Trains and even HO Monthly in that period. Most of those are in "well read" condition <g>.

I know about a half-dozen other life subscribers, so there has to be a fair number of us.

Most special-interest magazines like Trains would probably note such things as their longest-subscriber and maybe its old lifers in an aniversary issue .

David P. Morgan (and I'm told, Al. Kalmbach before that) used to send a personal note of thanks, BTW.

Maybe Trains at 65 will include such.

In any case, a number for us on the R&LHS list -- which has guys with Railroad History collections going back to the 1920s -- that's a pile too! <g> . My guess is either they're not married or have spouses that have [space-consuming] hobbies of their own.

Cheers,
Jim Guthrie
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, September 11, 2005 7:24 PM
I have over 20 years worth of Trains Magazines and most are complete years. I never considered a life-time subscription and I am sure there are others out there who have a bigger pile of magazines than me.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Trains Magazine
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, September 11, 2005 3:58 PM
Over on the R&LHS List the topic has come up as to how many of us are Lifetime Subscribers to Trains magazine.

I might ask the same thing of Model Railroader (which discontinued that option before Trains did, I think).

Cheers,
Jim Guthrie

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy