Pump
USAF TSgt C-17 Aircraft Maintenance Flying Crew Chief & Flightline Avionics Craftsman
QUOTE: Originally posted by ndbprr Another brilliant first post. Explain to me how traction motors work under water on tracks that are washed out and how people borad under 8' of water? Why don't you volunteer to ride the first train so when it derails the others know where the danger is.
QUOTE: Originally posted by AntonioFP45 If this were the early 1980s, perhaps a "Pre-Evacuation could have been facilitated as Amtrak's fleet was actually larger. There were plenty of heritage fleet cars that were rebuilt. However, as pointed out before, getting train crews, arranging dispatching schedules, etc., would likely prove very difficult. Add the fact that so called "redundant" rail routes have been scaled back or eliminated Passenger rail still has great potential in this country but with the current mindset in Washington and our rail systems infrastructure, it's doubtful it will see its true potential realized.
"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"
QUOTE: Noone would have to!! What would they say, If you cant pay, you will be killed in the flood water!!!!?????? Amtrak could have done it for free if they wanted to!
QUOTE: Originally posted by chad thomas Amtrak barely gets by with what equiptment they do have for everyday operations. Where are they going to get the equiptment for a rescue of this magnitude? And who would pay for it?
Mechanical Department "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."
The Missabe Road: Safety First
QUOTE: Originally posted by Junctionfan QUOTE: Originally posted by chad thomas Amtrak barely gets by with what equiptment they do have for everyday operations. Where are they going to get the equiptment for a rescue of this magnitude? And who would pay for it? Who's going to pay for the 15,000 buses? Considering that Bush is going to have to dip into the reserves, it makes no sense to operate that many fuel guzzlers when it would be more efficient to conserve it and lash up a bunch Amtrak and non-Amtrak rollingstock. I don't see money being a problem as that is alot easier to obtain then oil.
-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/)
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.