Trains.com

The H3 BNSF scheme is taking over cars.

1718 views
19 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, June 14, 2005 1:11 AM
I saw a BNSF train in january, with BRAND NEW hoppers, (end of january) and they were just built! haha! sucks for BNSF!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, June 14, 2005 1:10 AM
*uc*s, doesn't it? Apparently the BNSF is going with all due speed to put in that swoosh, or to use my terminology ban the warbonnet.

What is so special about block-italics of BNSF? General Electric put its initials (GE) on the top of Rockefeller Center in italics. The public doesn't much care for it, though. GE went back to its "monogram" logo and even named the credit service that.

As for GE's problem child, NBC, they use all kinds of logos: the 1940's "chimes" logo that goes back to the NBC Red radio network; the "snake" ("NBC" spelling itself out in one motion, the drawing never leaving the screen [1959]), the "Peacock" of course, concurrent with the shift to all-color broadcasting (mid-Sixties); and the more stylized Peacock of recent years.

As far as I remember, the only logo National Broadcasting left alone after its introduction was that crazy, blocky "N" that some high-powered design firm came up for them in about 1976--that was the one that looked very much like the "N" that a Nebraska PBS outlet had designed for themselves earlier.

And what, pray, is so great about the swoosh? I mean, it was cute when Michael Jordan was advertising with it ten or fifteen years ago, but it is SO tired and overused. My bank uses one. My produce stand uses one. Value City, a local department store, uses one. And on and on. Hardly a symbol of daring modernity!

Conclusions: (1) No one, not even graphix people, are quite as cool as they think they are. (2) Heritage works. An anhistorical motto like the new swoosh may cause RR people to think they are being extra cool, but in the public's eye (and that includes most shippers, I'd wager), recognizable trademarks are not to be jettisoned. (3) When a railroad's company store offers only the latest logos (and here BNSF seems to fit), that line is in effect going to some trouble to throw away money.

I know the April 11 board meeting put BNSF on track to paint the new design on as much stuff as possible. I won't deign to call it Heritage Anything, because as the writer so well remarked in a posting above, "Heritage" has nothing to do with it.

Heck, why can't the BNSF incorporate the old -- I think it was Northern Pacific -- circle with red and black "yin" and "yang" kind of symbols? Would look great on freight for exort to Asia and send a message two.

Is it worth bothering Mr. Rose again about these issues. Or is this a totally done deal and the paint-overs couldn't even be phased in more gradually?

allen




  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: Milwaukee, WI, US
  • 1,384 posts
Posted by fuzzybroken on Monday, June 13, 2005 11:37 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by ericsp

I seem to recall reading somewhere, I think it might have been in Trains, that the green has been replaced with black on the new paint scheme. If this is correct, can this still be called a "Heritage" scheme?
Maybe another "Dark Future" paint scheme??? [:o][}:)]

-Mark
www.fuzzyworld3.com
-Fuzzy Fuzzy World 3
  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 5,134 posts
Posted by ericsp on Monday, June 13, 2005 11:22 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by edblysard

You should see it on the side of their new grain hoppers!

Ed

I saw one of those last week. It actually did not look bad. Fortunately, I still have not seen a locomotive in this paint scheme.

I seem to recall reading somewhere, I think it might have been in Trains, that the green has been replaced with black on the new paint scheme. If this is correct, can this still be called a "Heritage" scheme?

"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • 484 posts
Posted by DPD1 on Monday, June 13, 2005 11:10 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by n_stephenson

What's more unusual to me is seeing a RR owned tankcar. The overwhelming majority of tank cars I have ever seen have been privately owned. I wonder if BNSF's new logo scheme could inspire a new era of logo changes for the other RR's.


I was thinking the same thing... I didn't think those existed anymore. I also saw a pic someone took of a gray BNSF hopper that had the logo in orange, and it looked like the swoosh might be dark green, but I couldn't tell. At least it's nice to see some color other then brown and white.

Dave
-DPD Productions - Featuring the NEW TrainTenna LP Gain RR Scanner Antenna-
http://eje.railfan.net/dpdp/
  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: Milwaukee, WI, US
  • 1,384 posts
Posted by fuzzybroken on Monday, June 13, 2005 8:50 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by CHPENNSYLVANIA

Bring back the Warbonnet.
I'll second that one! Heck, if they wanna be creative, one with Cascade (BN) green and silver would even do!

-Mark
www.fuzzyworld3.com
-Fuzzy Fuzzy World 3
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Monday, June 13, 2005 7:59 PM
Looks great on the side of a tank car[:)],sucks on the nose of a GEVO[:(!].
Saw a string of BNSF 5 unit articulated well gons last Friday.
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Monday, June 13, 2005 7:42 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Bob-Fryml

Thirteen years ago BN was buying diesel fuel for its Guernsey, Wyo. locomotive servicing facility from the Frontier Oil Refinery in Cheyenne. Quite a few larger capacity tank cars stencilled for the C.B.& Q. plus the Great Northern Railway handled that Company business and there may have been some B.N. ones as well.

This issue does bring to mind one interesting practice that the pre-BNSF BN had implemented and that was a series of Galesburg-Seattle power sets equipped with diesel fuel tank cars. A typical locomotive consist featured two SD40-2s + BN tank car + two SD40-2s. The tank car was equipped with M.U. cable pass-through wiring as well as M.U. hoses pass-though pipes. The idea here was to fuel the train at the cheapest point just ONCE each round trip between northern Illinois and Puget Sound. Does BNSF still maintain that practice, or have they abandoned it?

BN stopped using fuel cars before the merger.
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: US
  • 733 posts
Posted by Bob-Fryml on Monday, June 13, 2005 7:34 PM
Thirteen years ago BN was buying diesel fuel for its Guernsey, Wyo. locomotive servicing facility from the Frontier Oil Refinery in Cheyenne. Quite a few larger capacity tank cars stencilled for the C.B.& Q. plus the Great Northern Railway handled that Company business and there may have been some B.N. ones as well.

This issue does bring to mind one interesting practice that the pre-BNSF BN had implemented and that was a series of Galesburg-Seattle power sets equipped with diesel fuel tank cars. A typical locomotive consist featured two SD40-2s + BN tank car + two SD40-2s. The tank car was equipped with M.U. cable pass-through wiring as well as M.U. hoses pass-though pipes. The idea here was to fuel the train at the cheapest point just ONCE each round trip between northern Illinois and Puget Sound. Does BNSF still maintain that practice, or have they abandoned it?
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Monday, June 13, 2005 7:05 PM
It’s a combustible liquid...I agree with you Jay, it a tank car full of diesel fuel...
Still a lot of the old ATSF fuel tank cars running around....[
quote]Originally posted by jeaton

Can't read the Haz Mat Placard, but wouldn't it be company material, possibly diesal fuel?

Jay

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Monday, June 13, 2005 6:04 PM
Much simpler stencil application.
Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 13, 2005 5:59 PM
Interesting how BNSF is using two types of lettering on the tank car. The older style lettering is use for the reporting marks above the car's number.

Regarding the new paint scheme on BNSF's locomotives, what's the point in changing from green to black anyway?
  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Illinois
  • 484 posts
Posted by joegreen on Monday, June 13, 2005 5:55 PM
QUOTE: First, they don't paint new ES44DC's in H3


Actually any engine from the 7740s and up have the new H3 scheme.
www.12ozprophet.com
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Louisville, KY
  • 1,345 posts
Posted by CSXrules4eva on Monday, June 13, 2005 5:20 PM
Hay you know what BNSF's new scheme and logo might just as well in spire the other railroads to do something more "futuristic". I honestly don't know. I already know CSX isn't going to get inspired because, they already invested in the yn3 paint.
I have to keep a sharp lookout for new tank cars with the new BNSF logo!

Glen Ellyn you never know Metra might look good in H4 paint! Really lol.
LORD HELP US ALL TO BE ORIGINAL AND NOT CRISPY!!! please? Sarah J.M. Warner conductor CSX
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 13, 2005 5:13 PM
Bring back the Warbonnet.
  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: Milwaukee, WI, US
  • 1,384 posts
Posted by fuzzybroken on Monday, May 30, 2005 12:18 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by n_stephenson

I wonder if BNSF's new logo scheme could inspire a new era of logo changes for the other RR's.
I hope not!!! Hopefully the new logo will inspire a new logo change on BNSF! (Not to mention name change!)

-Mark
www.fuzzyworld3.com
www.geocities.com/fuzzybroken
-Fuzzy Fuzzy World 3
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Rockton, IL
  • 4,821 posts
Posted by jeaton on Sunday, May 29, 2005 9:00 PM
Can't read the Haz Mat Placard, but wouldn't it be company material, possibly diesal fuel?

Jay

"We have met the enemy and he is us." Pogo Possum "We have met the anemone... and he is Russ." Bucky Katt "Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." Niels Bohr, Nobel laureate in physics

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, May 29, 2005 8:49 PM
What's more unusual to me is seeing a RR owned tankcar. The overwhelming majority of tank cars I have ever seen have been privately owned. I wonder if BNSF's new logo scheme could inspire a new era of logo changes for the other RR's.
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Sunday, May 29, 2005 8:04 PM
You should see it on the side of their new grain hoppers!

Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Chicago Subarbs
  • 638 posts
The H3 BNSF scheme is taking over cars.
Posted by Glen Ellyn on Sunday, May 29, 2005 8:00 PM
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=107855

Very strange. First, they don't paint new ES44DC's in H3, but they will paint cars in H3? What's next, H4 on METRA?
Andrew Barchifowski, Glen Ellyn</font id="red">, LJ, #3300, Scott, FLODO.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy