Trains.com

An odd sight

941 views
16 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 5,134 posts
An odd sight
Posted by ericsp on Sunday, April 17, 2005 8:08 PM
Now I have seen everything. Here is an intermodal train with two SW1500s in the consist.
http://www.donsdarkroom.com/images/SP%20Photos/sp%209766%20east-sunset.jpg

"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Sunday, April 17, 2005 8:19 PM
At least they were not in the lead !!!

But seriously, I used to see that from time to time on the Sunset over Beaumont pass. They must be heading to the shop for there 90 day or for more serious maintainance. Probably headed for Taylor shops.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, April 17, 2005 9:36 PM
Well its not UP... 2 years later it would be UP
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, April 18, 2005 2:17 AM
Yes, I agree, seeing an SW-1500 in a consist is an odd sight out on the mainline. Just the other day I found that the Union Pacific was doing the same thing. There's was a MP15DC.
  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 5,134 posts
Posted by ericsp on Monday, April 18, 2005 2:54 AM
Seeing a switcher on a train on the mainline is not necesarily odd, they do have to transfer from a yard to a maintence facility and vice versa. It is seeing them on an intermodal train that is odd.

What is the point in pointing out that two years after the picture was taken UP bought out SP?

"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,048 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Monday, April 18, 2005 3:16 AM
If you are going to move power from one point to another for maintenance or any other reason, and use of the power on the train, intermodal or anything else, even Amtrak, won't restrict the maximum speed, why not have the power used instead of being just dead weight? If they did anything else it would be wasting money.
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: roundhouse
  • 2,747 posts
Posted by Randy Stahl on Monday, April 18, 2005 5:56 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by daveklepper

If you are going to move power from one point to another for maintenance or any other reason, and use of the power on the train, intermodal or anything else, even Amtrak, won't restrict the maximum speed, why not have the power used instead of being just dead weight? If they did anything else it would be wasting money.
Most likely the switchers are isolated, SWs have a bad habit of overheating if the airflow into the radiators is resticted ,like coupling another engine in front of it.
Randy
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Back home on the Chi to KC racetrack
  • 2,011 posts
Posted by edbenton on Monday, April 18, 2005 7:08 AM
Yes they do but with the UP so power short right now I would not have been amazed if they were not under power. The old SP SW1500 were gear4ed for 74 MPH so they could run road speed.
Always at war with those that think OTR trucking is EASY.
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,502 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Monday, April 18, 2005 12:57 PM
An even odder sight was found by me at Jamaica on LIRR in 1982. An MP15AC was on the head end of a suburban train with an HEP control cab rebuilt from an F7A on the other end. It was apparently standard practice.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Gateway to Donner Summit
  • 434 posts
Posted by broncoman on Monday, April 18, 2005 10:26 PM
I didn't know the layout of BNSF in Seattle but I was staying at a hotel along the water front that was all of 500 feet from a double track mainline and I saw 2 SW1500s moving a cut of about 50 or so double stacks with a caboose on the end. I know the container port was to the south and I am assuming that the classification yard was to the north? But to see the 2 little guys giving it there all was pretty impressive seeing as almost all other movements were being done with BNSF or CN 6 axles. They were probably holding about 20 MPH or so.

Dave
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Tuesday, April 19, 2005 5:32 PM
I saw a train in 1973,near West Colton yard,that was headed by 5 SW 1500s.
SW1500s were sometimes used in freight consists. I saw them on more than one occasion.
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • 484 posts
Posted by DPD1 on Wednesday, April 20, 2005 2:17 AM
In the early days, SWs use to get put in with the road power fairly often. I remember seeing that happen on the EJ&E a few times when I was a kid. They were hooked up with SD38-2s, and they were trying so hard to keep up, they sounded like they were going to explode. A typical early diesel consist on that RR was one center cab and an SW. Crazy mix.

Dave

-DPD Productions - Featuring the TrainTenna RR Radio Monitoring Antennas-
http://eje.railfan.net/dpdp/
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: NW Chicago
  • 591 posts
Posted by techguy57 on Wednesday, April 20, 2005 11:04 AM
On the flip side of the coin, I have generally seen geeps and MP15's on UP's HArvard Sub here in Crystal Lake. With the exception of a few regulars auto trains that run to and from Janesville, WI most of the the rest of the service is local switching. Interestingly enough lately have seen what would typically be road power, Dash-9's and AC4400's even UP 3300 Sd40-2 in United Way Red White and Blue Paint scheme running through with some frequency. Just a bizarre change of pace for a line that has not seen heavy freight traffic for some time.

Mike
techguy "Beware the lollipop of mediocrity. Lick it once and you suck forever." - Anonymous
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Wednesday, April 20, 2005 11:21 AM
The AAR type one (switcher) truck had no real lateral suspension. Running switchers at higher speeds is a BAAAAD idea! (even if they're geared for it!)

The flexicoil switcher truck does have lateral suspension and is OK for soeed.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Still on the other side of the tracks.
  • 397 posts
Posted by cpbloom on Wednesday, April 20, 2005 12:09 PM
The first thing I thought when I saw the photo is they are probably isolated but would they put them in the middle of the locos and not at the end???

I seem to remember a Pentrex video of Conrail where they had a switcher in a train and it WAS online with the SDs! [:O]
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,052 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, April 20, 2005 1:48 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by cpbloom

The first thing I thought when I saw the photo is they are probably isolated but would they put them in the middle of the locos and not at the end???

I seem to remember a Pentrex video of Conrail where they had a switcher in a train and it WAS online with the SDs! [:O]


Looking at the smoke images from the picture, the switchers are either isolated or being handled DIT (Dead in Tow) as they are not blowing smoke. The lead engine and the trailing road engines can be seen blowing smoke.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Wednesday, April 20, 2005 2:01 PM
When I used to see SP SWs going over Beaumont pass they would be working right along with the GP/SDs.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy