Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com
Originally posted by Mark_W._Hemphill Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR Austin TX Sub Reply martin.knoepfel Member sinceDecember 2003 400 posts Posted by martin.knoepfel on Tuesday, April 12, 2005 12:41 PM Extensive pooling requires standardized engines. In steam-days, this was not the case. Reply daveklepper Member sinceJune 2002 20,029 posts Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, April 12, 2005 12:55 PM It was not until the New Haven was merged into Penn Central that GG-1's started regularly handling passenger trains up to New Haven, eliminating the engine change at Penn Station, New York. Despite the New Haven EP-2's having been tested on the PRR and having been the basis for the GG-1 design. After the GG-1's started running through to New Haven, and before Conrail took over, the Electric Railroaders' Association charged an MP-54 Pennsy multiple-unit train to cover the trackage from Penn Station to New Haven and New Canaan. As far as I know that was the only time Pennsy MU equipment other than Metroliners ran across the Hell Gate Bridge and on New Haven tracks. Reply Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 12, 2005 4:16 PM B&M and Central Vermont pooled passenger power between White River Jct and Springfield. I believe this was to equalize mileage as part of the run was on CV rails and part on BM rails. Also there was some sort of crew pooling as well. Also CP and BM freight between White River Jct and Newport Vt. pooledd freight power. Reply Edit Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 13, 2005 11:21 AM QUOTE: Originally posted by dehusman The RDG and WM pooled power on the crossline operations between Rutherford and Cumberland. The RDG and CNJ also pooled steam passenger power between Jersey City and Harrisburg. They also pooled steam freight power between Elizabethport and Falls yard in Philadelphia. B&O ran their power through on the RDG and CNJ from Philadelphia to Jersey City. CNJ ran through their power on the Reading's Atlantic City Railroad from Winslow Junction to Atlantic City. I do not know if you would call it a pooling arrangement but the PRR and RDG would take turns providing power and crews for the transfer runs between Enola and Rutherford. Each would run it for a set number of months, then the other. Reply Edit CSSHEGEWISCH Member sinceMarch 2016 From: Burbank IL (near Clearing) 13,492 posts Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Thursday, April 14, 2005 9:21 AM Transfer arranagements as mentioned above are informal agreements to attempt to balance the work between each road's seniority rosters and are not really pooling. It is usually an attempt to get control labor costs compared to the usual method of a crew delivering transfers from their road and returning light or caboose hop. The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul Reply Join our Community! Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account. Login » Register » Search the Community Newsletter Sign-Up By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy More great sites from Kalmbach Media Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy
Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR Austin TX Sub
QUOTE: Originally posted by dehusman The RDG and WM pooled power on the crossline operations between Rutherford and Cumberland.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.