Trains.com

C36-7 to C30-7?

1117 views
13 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2001
  • 415 posts
C36-7 to C30-7?
Posted by bbrant on Monday, March 28, 2005 10:54 AM
Saw a former Conrail unit, now CSX #7133, this weekend. Under the road number on the cab (engineer's side) were the markings C36-7. However, they were spray painted over and C30-7 was stenciled next to it.

My question is this. What would (was) changed that made this unit go from being a C36-7 to a C30-7?

Here's a link to a photo if anyone is interested.

http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=107133

Brian
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: roundhouse
  • 2,747 posts
Posted by Randy Stahl on Monday, March 28, 2005 10:56 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by bbrant

Saw a former Conrail unit, now CSX #7133, this weekend. Under the road number on the cab (engineer's side) were the markings C36-7. However, they were spray painted over and C30-7 was stenciled next to it.

My question is this. What would (was) changed that made this unit go from being a C36-7 to a C30-7?

Here's a link to a photo if anyone is interested.

http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=
Brian
The governer must be changed or recalibrated alog with the exitation panel.
Randy
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: US
  • 12 posts
Posted by trains61 on Monday, March 28, 2005 12:37 PM
They proably derated the H.P. of the engine by adjusting the fuel racks. Going from 3600 H.P. back to 3000 H.P. thereby reducing maintenance costs and fuel consumption.
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Back home on the Chi to KC racetrack
  • 2,011 posts
Posted by edbenton on Monday, March 28, 2005 12:59 PM
All that would need to be changed would be the fuel rack settings and also the electronics for the traction motors since they are not going to be getting all the amps they used to.
Always at war with those that think OTR trucking is EASY.
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: roundhouse
  • 2,747 posts
Posted by Randy Stahl on Monday, March 28, 2005 2:27 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by edbenton

All that would need to be changed would be the fuel rack settings and also the electronics for the traction motors since they are not going to be getting all the amps they used to.
If you change the injector rack without changing the governer or all of the governer settings the engine will hunt.
Randy
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Indianapolis, Indiana
  • 2,434 posts
Posted by gabe on Monday, March 28, 2005 2:42 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Randy Stahl

QUOTE: Originally posted by edbenton

All that would need to be changed would be the fuel rack settings and also the electronics for the traction motors since they are not going to be getting all the amps they used to.
If you change the injector rack without changing the governer or all of the governer settings the engine will hunt.
Randy


What do these engines hunt for?

Gabe
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Monday, March 28, 2005 2:44 PM
The quintessential RPM.
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: roundhouse
  • 2,747 posts
Posted by Randy Stahl on Monday, March 28, 2005 2:47 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by chad thomas

The quintessential RPM.
and the quintessential air box pressure.
Randy
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: North Carolina
  • 1,905 posts
Posted by csxns on Monday, March 28, 2005 3:09 PM
The engines hunt for the next car to hit at the next crossing.

Russell

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,794 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Monday, March 28, 2005 4:56 PM
If you get carried away with this you wind up with an SF30C which is what GE couldn't come up with in the first place.

And that poor prime mover is going to be alternately starving for air and then drowning in too much air until something can't take it anymore and dies (which is just like any old GE around here.[xx(], especially those ragged-out Cascade green things..)
Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: roundhouse
  • 2,747 posts
Posted by Randy Stahl on Monday, March 28, 2005 5:15 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by mudchicken

If you get carried away with this you wind up with an SF30C which is what GE couldn't come up with in the first place.

And that poor prime mover is going to be alternately starving for air and then drowning in too much air until something can't take it anymore and dies (which is just like any old GE around here.[xx(], especially those ragged-out Cascade green things..)
Soooo, you have seen our current fleet !
Randy
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,794 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Monday, March 28, 2005 5:22 PM
You got Kyle's Ex-BN GE's?....If so, saw them a lot, including the hanger queens!
Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, March 28, 2005 10:49 PM
Anything below three thousand horsepower would probably mean nixing the turbocharger. But, losing the turbocharger would necessitate a large drop in full fuel position and thus horsepower, so three thousand horsepower is probably a practical limit for derating without major changes.

The lower horsepower probably will cause the turbocharger to spool up more slowly. So keeping the exhaust clean might need some fiddling with fuel rack/ manifold pressure controls.
  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: U.S.-midwest
  • 68 posts
Posted by SID6FIVE on Saturday, April 2, 2005 6:50 AM
Mebbe someone sprayed the wrong numbers on the side...and it wasn't noticed 'til later??????
Don't worry,it's not supposed to make sense...

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy