Trains.com

CB&Q O-5B 4-8-4 #5629

10929 views
24 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: SIOUX FALLS, SOUTH DAKOTA
  • 2,483 posts
CB&Q O-5B 4-8-4 #5629
Posted by CANADIANPACIFIC2816 on Sunday, March 27, 2005 7:35 PM
A Burlington Route 05-B class 4-8-4, #5629, has been sitting on the grounds of the Colorado Railroad Museum in Golden for a good many years. And I sometimes wonder if ANYONE out there has ever done a mechanical study of her to determine if #5629 could ever be restored to operating condition. The Burlington had condemned her before the Colorado Railroad Museum had acquired her in the early 1960's.

I dream of seeing #5629 restored to operating condition, but I just wonder if she is too-far gone for that to ever happen. Are there any other CB&Q fans out there who would share my dream and would be asking the same questions??
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, March 27, 2005 8:41 PM
I saw that engine a couple of weeks ago on a trip down there. The engine did look pretty far gone. All of the moving parts look like they have been painted over about ten times, but I'm not sure what state the actual mechanics of the engine is in. I'm sure that with unlimited funds anything can run again, but it might be too high to make it worth while. But I would love to see it run again!

Also I might be able to get some pictures posted, I would just need to scan some slides that I took of it.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,790 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Sunday, March 27, 2005 8:53 PM
The engine just got into the museum grounds. It sat for years with another snowblower and steam engine on the opposite side of 44th on the Coors/BNSF property until could be moved. It slid more than it rolled during the moving process. The museum is justifyably spending its limited funds on other projects.

http://www.crrm.org/locomotives.htm It was retired in Mookietown the same year I was hatched.
Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Monday, March 28, 2005 7:17 AM
And my money is on my thinking that my dad probably hand-fired that particular engine more than once!

Let's see - 1956 to 2005 = Well, your feathers are a lot older than the Mookie, that is for sure!

[(-D]

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    August 2002
  • From: Turner Junction
  • 3,076 posts
Posted by CopCarSS on Monday, March 28, 2005 7:58 AM
#5629 is one of those engines I would love to see run again, but probably never will. There were lots of bigger, more powerful, sleeker 4-8-4's out there, but the O5a/b's were just the quintessential steam locomotive to me. It's the locomotive I picture in my mind when I don't have a better description.

As the others have said, chances are really slim she'll ever run again. Probably about the same as me winning Powerball. Come to think of it, if I win Powerball, maybe I could finance her return to steam! It's always nice to dream a little, isn't it!

Chris
Denver, CO

-Chris
West Chicago, IL
Christopher May Fine Art Photography

"In wisdom gathered over time I have found that every experience is a form of exploration." ~Ansel Adams

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,029 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Monday, March 28, 2005 3:28 PM
What happened to 5632?
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,442 posts
Posted by Overmod on Monday, March 28, 2005 4:21 PM
Dave, you don't want to know. It's too sad.
  • Member since
    August 2002
  • From: Turner Junction
  • 3,076 posts
Posted by CopCarSS on Monday, March 28, 2005 4:30 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by daveklepper

What happened to 5632?


May she rest in peace. [:(] Like Overmod said, it's pretty sad. I can spill the details, but its best you remember her in her excursion service, and while she was the world's biggest brass engine (remember the gold paint job? I don't...but I've seen pictures). Wish I could've known you 5632. [:(][sigh]

-Chris
West Chicago, IL
Christopher May Fine Art Photography

"In wisdom gathered over time I have found that every experience is a form of exploration." ~Ansel Adams

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, March 28, 2005 5:08 PM
Dear Dave,
http://www.steamlocomotive.com/lists/recent-losses.shtml

May they rest in peace.

Sincerely,
Daniel Parks
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: SIOUX FALLS, SOUTH DAKOTA
  • 2,483 posts
Posted by CANADIANPACIFIC2816 on Monday, March 28, 2005 8:01 PM
What happened to #5632? She was sold for scrap over a dispute involving the cost of her storage. At least that is the word that I got several years ago. While I don't have tabs on what steamers from the Burlington, and Colorado & Southern were preserved, I know that a large number of them were sold for scrap, including virtually all of the Q's M-4 class 2-10-4's...........and that was a crime!!! I first got interested in the Burlington Route in 1982 when I purchased an HO scale CB&Q 2-10-4, #6315, imported by Nickel Plate Products, from a local hobby dealer. I still have it today and I still occasionally run it out on our club's layout in Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

Ray Loftesness II
CANDADIAN PACIFIC2816
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Monday, March 28, 2005 8:11 PM
I saw this engine at the CRM in 1979.I took a picture of it as an example of a pre 1970 Burlington Northern[}:)]!
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, March 28, 2005 8:48 PM
Guess I'm the lucky one. I remember standing in an open dutch door vestibule with stop watch in hand to measure the time between mile posts. It was one of the Burlington fantrips out of Chicago. She was cruising at 90 per! And for photo run bys she was the loudesat engine I ever heard. I'm a Milwaukee Road fan but the 5632 was a mighty impressive engine.
Gordon Smith
  • Member since
    February 2012
  • 257 posts
Posted by nobullchitbids on Monday, March 28, 2005 9:06 PM
Speaking of old steam locos I have known, anyone know the fate of:

The Chessie Kanawha once parked near Cleveland's zoo?

The NKP S-2 once kept on a siding in Conneaut, Ohio?

The Reading T-1 at the time stored in what was left of Conneaut's roundhouse and shops?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, March 28, 2005 9:44 PM
I know in the 80's the BN was considering using 5629, the Pacific in Childress, or another Burlington engine for excursion duty. I looked at two of them. If I remember right, the 29 was the first choice, but was nixed by the Golden people. That stopped that.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 29, 2005 7:20 AM
I remember 5632 pulling fan-trips as well and might have seen 5629 on the Christmas mail & express trains, but was too young to remember engine numbers. Aside from major things like the boiler, If 5629 was vandalized while stored, replacing missing appliances and cab fittings can be a major headache. The Illinois Railway Museum has a Q 4-6-4, a 2-8-2, and a 4-6-0. Of the 3 the Hudson is probably in the worst shape.
  • Member since
    August 2001
  • From: US
  • 240 posts
Posted by gbrewer on Tuesday, March 29, 2005 10:02 AM
Gordon,

Was that the 5632 at the end of the day when they doubled with 6315? The ride I remember sure was fast and in the dark. I was in another dutch door savoring the sounds.
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 131 posts
Posted by BurlingtonJohn on Tuesday, March 29, 2005 10:43 AM
IIRC, 5629 belongs to the NRHS chapter in Denver and is NOT owned by the CRRM.

I took pictures of the cab interior several years ago and everything is in good shape (just a little dusty). Everything is where it should be. The cab is kept locked and not opened to the general public.

That said, I can't speak for the condition of the boiler/firebox. I seem to remember somebody telling me that it was used as a stationary boiler at one time and as a result, the boiler/firebox is not in the best of shape. I could be (and probably am) wrong.

5629 is an oil burner, so if I ever win the lottery .....

Regards & Everywhere West,

Burlington John

PS - I have a CD of the 6315/5632 on a doubleheader excursion run to Galesburg. The sound is incredible .... the 6315 went lame and the 5632 ended up pushing the disabled engine the rest of the way, as well as pulling a considerable excursion consist!

THE site for American Freedom Train fans http://www.freedomtrain.org

  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: SIOUX FALLS, SOUTH DAKOTA
  • 2,483 posts
Posted by CANADIANPACIFIC2816 on Tuesday, March 29, 2005 11:04 AM
Burlington John:

The Colorado Railroad Museum now owns #5629. The NRHS donated her to the museum last year. I read this in the November 2004 issue of the museum's Iron Horse News.

Ray Loftesness II
CANADIANPACIFIC2816
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 131 posts
Posted by BurlingtonJohn on Tuesday, March 29, 2005 11:51 AM
Thanks Ray, I didn't know that. You learn something new every day!

Regards,
Burlington John

THE site for American Freedom Train fans http://www.freedomtrain.org

  • Member since
    August 2002
  • From: Turner Junction
  • 3,076 posts
Posted by CopCarSS on Tuesday, March 29, 2005 3:34 PM
Since we're talking so much about her, I thought she deserved to have her picture shown to world, since she such a good-looking lady:







Chris
Denver, CO

-Chris
West Chicago, IL
Christopher May Fine Art Photography

"In wisdom gathered over time I have found that every experience is a form of exploration." ~Ansel Adams

  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: SIOUX FALLS, SOUTH DAKOTA
  • 2,483 posts
Posted by CANADIANPACIFIC2816 on Tuesday, March 29, 2005 3:48 PM
Thanks for sharing your pictures with the rest of us, Chris. The last time I had seen her up close was in the summer of 1985. I have some black and white photos of her that I had purchased at a Burlington Route Historical Society meet in Lincoln, Nebraska in 1997. #5629 looks better in your pictures than she does in the black & white prints that I have. So even though she is not likely to ever run again, the Colorado Railroad Museum is at least keeping her looking sharp.

Ray Loftesness II
CANADAINAPACIFIC2816
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, March 31, 2005 3:21 PM
The C&O 2707 by the zoo in Cleveland was moved in 1982 to the B&O
yards in the flats area of Cleveland where it sat for another 11 years
until1993. Then it was moved to the Illinos Railroad Museam.
The Nickel Plate locomotive I beleave you refer to is the 755. It now sits
outside the old New York Central depot in Conneaut with a hopper and, caboose that are all part of a museam in the depot.
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,029 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, March 31, 2005 3:29 PM
Apparently, according to the add in TRAINS, the K4 that used to be at Horseshoe, is now the "Official State of Pennsylvania Locomotive." Does this mean she'll get or got some State tax money?

If so, maybe some New York State fans can boost the fate of the remaining Mowhawk, where she may be. It is too bad a J3A or even a J1 Hudson wasn;t saved somewhere, but there is a Mowhawk 4-8-2 somewhere I understand.
  • Member since
    August 2002
  • From: Turner Junction
  • 3,076 posts
Posted by CopCarSS on Thursday, March 31, 2005 5:54 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by daveklepper
If so, maybe some New York State fans can boost the fate of the remaining Mowhawk, where she may be. It is too bad a J3A or even a J1 Hudson wasn;t saved somewhere, but there is a Mowhawk 4-8-2 somewhere I understand.


I wanna see one of those Dreyfuss Art Deco Hudson Streamliners running at 100+!!!![sigh]

Chris
Denver, CO

-Chris
West Chicago, IL
Christopher May Fine Art Photography

"In wisdom gathered over time I have found that every experience is a form of exploration." ~Ansel Adams

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: US
  • 33 posts
Posted by BNIRRLives on Sunday, April 3, 2005 6:56 PM
It would be cool to see her run but it is also important keeping it from rusting away. I have never seen the engine in person, but the insulation and jacket should be removed, or move the engine inside under a roof some how.

BNIRRLives

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy