Trains.com

Rochelle Webcam

1265 views
24 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Rochelle Webcam
Posted by spbed on Thursday, March 24, 2005 12:33 PM
Any else have difficulty seeing the pix? [:(]

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • 101 posts
Posted by ozzy01 on Thursday, March 24, 2005 12:41 PM
I was there earlier and caught the end of an UP coal train with ex SP unit as a dpu. Went to look at recent pics, went back to railcam and got initializing cam, but nothing happened,must be down.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Posted by spbed on Thursday, March 24, 2005 12:43 PM
Thanks good to know it was not me. My story is exactly the same as your. Hope T/magazine knows. [:(]

QUOTE: Originally posted by ozzy01

I was there earlier and caught the end of an UP coal train with ex SP unit as a dpu. Went to look at recent pics, went back to railcam and got initializing cam, but nothing happened,must be down.

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Wisconsin, land o' cows
  • 207 posts
Posted by mikeyuhas on Thursday, March 24, 2005 1:29 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by spbed

Thanks good to know it was not me. My story is exactly the same as your. Hope T/magazine knows. [:(]

QUOTE: Originally posted by ozzy01

I was there earlier and caught the end of an UP coal train with ex SP unit as a dpu. Went to look at recent pics, went back to railcam and got initializing cam, but nothing happened,must be down.


The good people at Rochelle are having some network issues, and expect the problem to be rectified within a couple hours.
Thank you for reading Trains magazine! click here if you dare
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, March 24, 2005 1:46 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by mikeyuhas
Click here if you dare


I dared, and wow! Thanks for the update, now can we get them a better camera? [:D]

EDIT nice camera you use for your shots, but umm..it's not exactly cheap [:p]
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 24,888 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, March 24, 2005 2:19 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by SteamerFan

QUOTE: Originally posted by mikeyuhas
Click here if you dare


I dared, and wow! Thanks for the update, now can we get them a better camera? [:D]

EDIT nice camera you use for your shots, but umm..it's not exactly cheap [:p]

It's not the camera (well, it could be, partly)- it's the bandwidth, and it costs money.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Louisville, KY
  • 9,002 posts
Posted by cherokee woman on Thursday, March 24, 2005 2:26 PM
I just pulled up the webcam; didn't have any trouble, but nothing on the
tracks, either.
Angel cherokee woman "O'Toole's law: Murphy was an optimist."
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, March 24, 2005 2:43 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by tree68
It's not the camera (well, it could be, partly)- it's the bandwidth, and it costs money.


Larry, I've been viewing thier pictures off and on over the course of the year, I doubt it's a bandwidth problem, because even on the good days, the image is of poor quality. it looks as if they're using your basic Quickcam (low quality, low compression) for a PC, instead of a better high quality, High Compression Digital camera set up. Now today, yes it's having bandwitdh problems, sicne you get occasional loss of image and packet loss indicators.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 24,888 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, March 24, 2005 2:51 PM
The idea of bigger and better for Rochelle has been discussed many times. Right now we're seeing 2-4 second refreshes, and can have something like 5 concurrent viewers. Improving the camera image will likely require more bandwidth, meaning someone has to pony up for the bandwidth, or we have to settle for less frequent views or fewer concurrent viewers.

Mr Yuhas can elaborate.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, March 24, 2005 3:18 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by tree68

The idea of bigger and better for Rochelle has been discussed many times. Right now we're seeing 2-4 second refreshes, and can have something like 5 concurrent viewers. Improving the camera image will likely require more bandwidth, meaning someone has to pony up for the bandwidth, or we have to settle for less frequent views or fewer concurrent viewers.

Mr Yuhas can elaborate.
You mean like the Ft Madison web cam? Your only allowed a Max of 15 mins of cam time before the cam goes "Disconnected".
BNSFrailfan.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Wisconsin, land o' cows
  • 207 posts
Posted by mikeyuhas on Thursday, March 24, 2005 4:57 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by tree68

The idea of bigger and better for Rochelle has been discussed many times. Right now we're seeing 2-4 second refreshes, and can have something like 5 concurrent viewers. Improving the camera image will likely require more bandwidth, meaning someone has to pony up for the bandwidth, or we have to settle for less frequent views or fewer concurrent viewers.

Mr Yuhas can elaborate.

A little, perhaps. Our setup uses an industrial grade Sony video camera that provides reasonably good resolution. The live and still images you see are scaled to about 50% of the camera's normal capability. We've experimented with 100% images, but they tend to look like video captures, which is essentially what they are. At 100%, we could offer larger size, but at no perceptible increase in quality -- and we'd eat up bandwidth at a rate 4X what we use now.

Larry is correct: we could offer more (larger images, less compressed and higher quality images, faster live image refreshes, and more concurrent users) but the bandwidth price would be prohibitive. We want to keep the Rochelle webcam free to all our users [:)]





While I'm here, one more thing...

QUOTE: Originally posted by SteamerFan

QUOTE: Originally posted by mikeyuhas
Click here if you dare


I dared, and wow! Thanks for the update, now can we get them a better camera? [:D]

EDIT nice camera you use for your shots, but umm..it's not exactly cheap [:p]

Just so we're clear, when you click the "Click here if you dare" link in my signature, you're taken to my own personal website, where I showcase some of my off-hours railroad photography. It's not connected with trains.com, Kalmbach Publishing Co., or Erik Bergstrom in any way.

But I do love my Canon Digital Rebel...
Thank you for reading Trains magazine! click here if you dare
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, March 24, 2005 6:52 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by mikeyuhas
Just so we're clear, when you click the "Click here if you dare" link in my signature, you're taken to my own personal website, where I showcase some of my off-hours railroad photography. It's not connected with trains.com, Kalmbach Publishing Co., or Erik Bergstrom in any way.

But I do love my Canon Digital Rebel...



well i Knew it was your personal site, but it's missing some steam [;)]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, March 24, 2005 7:06 PM
I know that im gona get yelled at for saying this but,TRAIN.COM.........What is the Point of haveing a Web Cam on during the Night time when you can't even see the Trains? BNSFrailfan.
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Southern Region now, UK
  • 820 posts
Posted by Hugh Jampton on Thursday, March 24, 2005 7:38 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by BNSF railfan.

I know that im gona get yelled at for saying this but,TRAIN.COM.........What is the Point of haveing a Web Cam on during the Night time when you can't even see the Trains? BNSFrailfan.


I watch it at night.. The lights of the trains are very pretty.
Generally a lurker by nature

Be Alert
The world needs more lerts.

It's the 3rd rail that makes the difference.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, March 24, 2005 7:49 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Hugh Jampton

QUOTE: Originally posted by BNSF railfan.

I know that im gona get yelled at for saying this but,TRAIN.COM.........What is the Point of haveing a Web Cam on during the Night time when you can't even see the Trains? BNSFrailfan.


I watch it at night.. The lights of the trains are very pretty.
You would too.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Posted by spbed on Friday, March 25, 2005 7:24 AM
Its a 24/7 thing also people like in Calif 2 hours behind CST people can at least look in & see the bright lites as they go by. I watch it sometimes @ 0500 CST & find it kind of neat. [:D]

Originally posted by BNSF railfan.
[

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Posted by spbed on Friday, March 25, 2005 7:27 AM
Then all you have to do is hit your refresh button! Works everytime[:D][:D]


Originally posted by BNSF railfan.

[

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Friday, March 25, 2005 7:30 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by BNSF railfan.

QUOTE: Originally posted by Hugh Jampton

QUOTE: Originally posted by BNSF railfan.

I know that im gona get yelled at for saying this but,TRAIN.COM.........What is the Point of haveing a Web Cam on during the Night time when you can't even see the Trains? BNSFrailfan.


I watch it at night.. The lights of the trains are very pretty.
You would too.
I am in here a dark-30 in the morning and enjoy seeing the lights coming down the track toward me!

Moo

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: SIOUX FALLS, SOUTH DAKOTA
  • 2,483 posts
Posted by CANADIANPACIFIC2816 on Thursday, March 31, 2005 10:00 AM
It is too bad that TRAINS is not able to make significant improvements with it's Rochelle webcam and still keep this service free to their users. I wi***he picture could be a lot sharper, and it has an overall gray tone to it, which I do not care for. But still, watching it has become somewhat adictive to me. I watched five trains roll past the camera within the space of about an hour. And that's more than what I am used to seeing here at home.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Posted by spbed on Thursday, March 31, 2005 11:13 AM
My logic is something is better then nothing. Have you tried the Ft. Madison cam? If I had my druthers I could think of spots that would give more typical RR action then Rochelle. But I really/truly appreciate Trains for doing it & allowing us access. [:o)][:I]

Originally posted by CANADIANPACIFIC2816

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 24,888 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, March 31, 2005 12:18 PM
I think our firewall is now blocking the video, so trainwatching at work is out now for me...

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Thursday, March 31, 2005 12:29 PM
Hmmm - firewall in fire station and fire chief has problems.

Pictures at 11.....

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: The Worlds first Navy Base (Kent)
  • 34 posts
Posted by Old Limey on Saturday, April 2, 2005 5:48 PM
As things improve with bandwiths etc, one day sound will really put you at the end of the platform in Rochelle.(I Hope) One advantage at night is knowing that the freights are creeping up on you from either track behind. I did see a anorak at the viewing point in front of the camera during the day once who by body language let us viewers know that a hidden train was coming. Has anyone seen a streaker yet?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, April 2, 2005 6:03 PM
i hope not

but with everyone wanting to upgrade the webcam why dont we all pitch in and make a website with a better webcam?

by the way i cant view the cam with dsl connection. is it norton antivirus or what.?
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Duluth,Minnesota,USA
  • 4,015 posts
Posted by coborn35 on Saturday, April 2, 2005 6:41 PM
Wouldnt we have to have permission from whoever owns the Rochelle Railroad Park?

Mechanical Department  "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."

The Missabe Road: Safety First

 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy