Trains.com

Whats up with Union Pacific in Fort Maddisson?

1517 views
18 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Chicago Subarbs
  • 638 posts
Whats up with Union Pacific in Fort Maddisson?
Posted by Glen Ellyn on Sunday, March 20, 2005 2:08 PM



Why is Union Pacific holding up traffic for the BNSF in Fort Maddison?
Andrew Barchifowski, Glen Ellyn</font id="red">, LJ, #3300, Scott, FLODO.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, March 20, 2005 2:32 PM
What's the question? Your series of shots show a train moving on the tracks. Is it just going too slow?

Your Rochelle series shows trains hours apart. Look at the times. Your top series can't be more than a couple of seconds between the first and last. Look at the autos. You can follow them down the road.

Wayne
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, March 20, 2005 2:37 PM
Now what? The photos are different. You've hot linked this thread to the train cam?

Wayne
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, March 20, 2005 3:06 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Muddy Creek

What's the question? Your series of shots show a train moving on the tracks. Is it just going too slow?

Your Rochelle series shows trains hours apart. Look at the times. Your top series can't be more than a couple of seconds between the first and last. Look at the autos. You can follow them down the road.

Wayne


I dont get what the question is either. The train might of had a approach signal. Please explain what you are trying to ask/point out.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, March 20, 2005 3:45 PM
glad i don't have dial-up internet otherwise your posts would take years to load up... the copious amount of pictures and reeeeaaaallllllllyyyyyy long quotes get old...
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Chicago Subarbs
  • 638 posts
Posted by Glen Ellyn on Sunday, March 20, 2005 4:34 PM
Before the pictures got changed, I got saved shots from a 30 minute period of a Union Pacific train sitting their doing nothing. My question is, does anyone know why the UP train was doing that?
Andrew Barchifowski, Glen Ellyn</font id="red">, LJ, #3300, Scott, FLODO.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, March 20, 2005 4:37 PM
No idea. What's up with the Rochelle camera? Is that connected to the question?

Wayne
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,045 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Sunday, March 20, 2005 4:39 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Glen Ellyn

Before the pictures got changed, I got saved shots from a 30 minute period of a Union Pacific train sitting their doing nothing. My question is, does anyone know why the UP train was doing that?


There are only an infinate number of reasons that any train can be sitting still for 30 minutes....most all of the legitimate operating occurences.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Chicago Subarbs
  • 638 posts
Posted by Glen Ellyn on Sunday, March 20, 2005 4:39 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Muddy Creek

No idea. What's up with the Rochelle camera? Is that connected to the question?

Wayne


no.
Andrew Barchifowski, Glen Ellyn</font id="red">, LJ, #3300, Scott, FLODO.
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Southern Region now, UK
  • 820 posts
Posted by Hugh Jampton on Sunday, March 20, 2005 4:41 PM
It could be any one of 42 different reasons why the train is stopped, and I'm not going to list them all.
Generally a lurker by nature

Be Alert
The world needs more lerts.

It's the 3rd rail that makes the difference.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Posted by spbed on Tuesday, March 22, 2005 1:38 PM
Maybe the bridge is open to allow a barge to pass thru[?][?]



Originally posted by Glen Ellyn
[

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Posted by spbed on Tuesday, March 22, 2005 1:45 PM
I think I answered the question. At one time on this cam you could have gotten a better shot of the bridge. I used to time them in most cases the transaction from the opening of the bridge to the closing takes on average 15 minutes or more. There is a signal about 1/4 mile passed the road that now you can not see. Once upon a time you could key into that signal & know when the signal lit a EBer was on its way. When that signal is red the EB trains must stop before the road since they all have that I observed[:D][:D]

Originally posted by Glen Ellyn

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Still on the other side of the tracks.
  • 397 posts
Posted by cpbloom on Tuesday, March 22, 2005 5:50 PM
If you ask me this sounds like yet another attempt to [B)] Union Pacific.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 22, 2005 5:59 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by cpbloom

If you ask me this sounds like yet another attempt to [B)] Union Pacific.

Well, that's obvious by the question posed under the (still) hot-linked webcam photos. Or perhaps it's just to suck bandwith from the Fort Madison web cam?

Wayne
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Posted by spbed on Wednesday, March 23, 2005 6:55 AM
I thought so to it was UPRR bashing by the tone of the post. Just by the luck of the draw the UPRR train was caught at FM when the bridge was opening. I watch the FM cam a lot & when they have greens the UPRR is hot tailing it thru FM just like the BNSF does. The poster better think twice about UPRR bashing as maybe they will build that connector at Edelstein IL unplug EL Paso then they will swamp the BNSF with A/rackers & D/stackers/Intermodal which will slow down BNSF own running on there transcon. [:D][:D]

Originally posted by cpbloom

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Posted by spbed on Wednesday, March 23, 2005 6:58 AM
I watch the FM cam a lot & you get a least 12 minutes between disconnects so I do not think it was B/width. [:D][:p]

Originally posted by Muddy Creek

Originally posted by cpbloom

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Posted by spbed on Friday, March 25, 2005 7:18 AM
Well right now there is a EB BNSF train holding up the BNSF transcon @ FM because the bridge is opened. It arrived @ 0810 EST & I am typing this @ 0816 EST. Think we should begin a investigation for the delay? [:o)][:p]


Originally posted by Glen Ellyn

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Posted by spbed on Friday, March 25, 2005 7:29 AM
OK that BNSF train just got underway @ 0826EST. So that meant it sat there 16 minutes waiting for the opening/closing of the bridge[:p][:)][:D][8D]


Originally posted by Glen Ellyn
[

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Posted by spbed on Friday, March 25, 2005 2:03 PM
OK EB BNSF engine 701 lead on a Dstacker is now stopped at FM at 1500 hours EST because a barge is going thru so the bridge is open.


Originally posted by Glen Ellyn
[

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy