Trains.com

Somebody help me out here, Is there any Product or Raw material that HAS to go by train?

3939 views
57 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Somebody help me out here, Is there any Product or Raw material that HAS to go by train?
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 8, 2005 4:29 PM
That cant be moved by truck. Dimentional Loads would be one.
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Tuesday, March 8, 2005 4:32 PM
Yes,ME.I truly HATE to travel any other way[;)]!
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: US
  • 2,358 posts
Posted by csxengineer98 on Tuesday, March 8, 2005 4:41 PM
anything "could" be moved by truck that is moved by train..but it would take a hell of alot of trucks to do what 1 unit train can do.... 1 unit train of grain or coal of 100 cars and weighing around 15000 tons...would take a fleet of trucks to move..... you want more trucks on the highways?
csx engineer
"I AM the higher source" Keep the wheels on steel
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Canoga Park (Los Angeles)
  • 494 posts
Posted by TheS.P.caboose on Tuesday, March 8, 2005 4:50 PM
To go a little further on what csxengineer98 was saying, back in 1983 the Southern Pacific started a unit tank train, a contract train for Shell Oil, that is a unit train carrying crewd oil 1,848,600 gallons worth in 78 tankers with a weight of 10,608 tons that moved from Bakersfield to the Shell Oil refinery in the Long Beach area.

It would take up a lot of tanker trucks for that move.
Regards Gary
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 8, 2005 4:51 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by csxengineer98

anything "could" be moved by truck that is moved by train..but it would take a hell of alot of trucks to do what 1 unit train can do.... 1 unit train of grain or coal of 100 cars and weighing around 15000 tons...would take a fleet of trucks to move..... you want more trucks on the highways?
csx engineer


Ahem.... [8]

A river barge properly manned and with enough capacity can haul everything you can put on that 80 car train.

[^]
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Tuesday, March 8, 2005 5:05 PM
But only where the river runs....at some point it has to travel over land, either by truck or rail, with a few exceptions,
Some products do travel from point of origin/manufacter to point of use/consumption by barge only, but more products travel by rail.

Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Tuesday, March 8, 2005 8:42 PM
Anything that has to be put on a Schnabel car.
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 8, 2005 8:45 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by HighIron2003ar

QUOTE: Originally posted by csxengineer98

anything "could" be moved by truck that is moved by train..but it would take a hell of alot of trucks to do what 1 unit train can do.... 1 unit train of grain or coal of 100 cars and weighing around 15000 tons...would take a fleet of trucks to move..... you want more trucks on the highways?
csx engineer


Ahem.... [8]

A river barge properly manned and with enough capacity can haul everything you can put on that 80 car train.

[^]


...you don't see too many river barges hauling coal out of the powder river basin.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Crozet, VA
  • 1,049 posts
Posted by bobwilcox on Tuesday, March 8, 2005 8:57 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by TheS.P.caboose

To go a little further on what csxengineer98 was saying, back in 1983 the Southern Pacific started a unit tank train, a contract train for Shell Oil, that is a unit train carrying crewd oil 1,848,600 gallons worth in 78 tankers with a weight of 10,608 tons that moved from Bakersfield to the Shell Oil refinery in the Long Beach area.

It would take up a lot of tanker trucks for that move.


The Shell crude moved by pipeline before the train started in late 1981.
Bob
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 8, 2005 9:15 PM
Large pieces of dimension limestone, limestone used in building construction (pentagon, all kinds of memorials, etc.) I know use to basically use a all rail route until it got very near the final destination. This is basically due to the fact that it is cost prohibitive to ship very heavy pieces long distance by truck. All kinds of permitting and escorts are needed for very large and heavy loads.

Another example is the Boeing aircraft bodies and parts, which travel on the "Boeing Train" from Kansas to Washington State.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 8, 2005 9:36 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by bobwilcox

QUOTE: Originally posted by TheS.P.caboose

To go a little further on what csxengineer98 was saying, back in 1983 the Southern Pacific started a unit tank train, a contract train for Shell Oil, that is a unit train carrying crewd oil 1,848,600 gallons worth in 78 tankers with a weight of 10,608 tons that moved from Bakersfield to the Shell Oil refinery in the Long Beach area.

It would take up a lot of tanker trucks for that move.


The Shell crude moved by pipeline before the train started in late 1981.


Question how fast can the Oil move in a pipeline?
  • Member since
    September 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,015 posts
Posted by RudyRockvilleMD on Tuesday, March 8, 2005 9:44 PM
Some articles are even too large to be moved by rail because of clearences so they are moved by barge. An example of this were the External Tanks for the Shuttle. They were shipped by barge from the Michoud Assembly Facility to Cape Kennedy. Some articles are too heavy to be shipped by truck because of axle load restrictions.
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Antioch, IL
  • 4,371 posts
Posted by greyhounds on Tuesday, March 8, 2005 9:48 PM
QUOTE:

Question how fast can the Oil move in a pipeline?


For what it's worth, being that I read it in the Chicago Tribune, fuel from Texas moves to Chicago via pipeline at 4 MPH.

"By many measures, the U.S. freight rail system is the safest, most efficient and cost effective in the world." - Federal Railroad Administration, October, 2009. I'm just your average, everyday, uncivilized howling "anti-government" critic of mass government expenditures for "High Speed Rail" in the US. And I'm gosh darn proud of that.
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Antioch, IL
  • 4,371 posts
Posted by greyhounds on Tuesday, March 8, 2005 9:49 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by greyhounds



Question how fast can the Oil move in a pipeline?


For what it's worth, being that I read it in the Chicago Tribune, fuel from Texas moves to Chicago via pipeline at 4 MPH.

But it just keeps comming out of that pipe, or so I hope.
"By many measures, the U.S. freight rail system is the safest, most efficient and cost effective in the world." - Federal Railroad Administration, October, 2009. I'm just your average, everyday, uncivilized howling "anti-government" critic of mass government expenditures for "High Speed Rail" in the US. And I'm gosh darn proud of that.
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 4,115 posts
Posted by tatans on Tuesday, March 8, 2005 9:59 PM
Large military convoys(heavy tanks etc) over long distances.
  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 5,134 posts
Posted by ericsp on Tuesday, March 8, 2005 10:08 PM
Hoboes.

"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Tuesday, March 8, 2005 10:10 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by bobwilcox

QUOTE: Originally posted by TheS.P.caboose

To go a little further on what csxengineer98 was saying, back in 1983 the Southern Pacific started a unit tank train, a contract train for Shell Oil, that is a unit train carrying crewd oil 1,848,600 gallons worth in 78 tankers with a weight of 10,608 tons that moved from Bakersfield to the Shell Oil refinery in the Long Beach area.

It would take up a lot of tanker trucks for that move.


The Shell crude moved by pipeline before the train started in late 1981.


If the oil moved in a pipeline b4 81' why did the SP even get involved???

I don't think a pipeline ever moved oil in this lane.

  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 5,134 posts
Posted by ericsp on Tuesday, March 8, 2005 10:16 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by chad thomas

QUOTE: Originally posted by bobwilcox

QUOTE: Originally posted by TheS.P.caboose

To go a little further on what csxengineer98 was saying, back in 1983 the Southern Pacific started a unit tank train, a contract train for Shell Oil, that is a unit train carrying crewd oil 1,848,600 gallons worth in 78 tankers with a weight of 10,608 tons that moved from Bakersfield to the Shell Oil refinery in the Long Beach area.

It would take up a lot of tanker trucks for that move.


The Shell crude moved by pipeline before the train started in late 1981.


If the oil moved in a pipeline b4 81' why did the SP even get involved???

I don't think a pipeline ever moved oil in this lane.



Almost all of the crude oil from the southern San Joaquin Valley and central coast goes to LA. The August 1994 issue of Trains has an article about the Oil Cans. Also, the BKDOU, then MJDOU, has been completely replaced by a pipeline. They finally built a new one. It seems like it was over the Tejon Pass. I remember seeing a new pipeline being laid there in the late 1990s.

"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Tuesday, March 8, 2005 10:41 PM
I've been out of the LA scene for a few years (disclaimer),but...
The only pipeline I know of is the one from Bakersfield(Taft) to Mojave(Fleta). The tank train still runs from Mojave to Dolores. The pipeline just eliminated the run over the hill.
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Leadville, CO
  • 5 posts
Posted by drgw12 on Tuesday, March 8, 2005 10:58 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by ericsp

Hoboes.


LOL!!! [:D]Good one. Definatly got a laugh out of me. I don't think that Hoboes can travel by anything else ether.[;)]
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: State College PA
  • 344 posts
Posted by ajmiller on Tuesday, March 8, 2005 11:21 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by ericsp

Hoboes.


Is it cheaper to ship Minnesota hoboes to the Pacific Northwest or Montana hoboes?
  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 5,134 posts
Posted by ericsp on Tuesday, March 8, 2005 11:25 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by chad thomas

I've been out of the LA scene for a few years (disclaimer),but...
The only pipeline I know of is the one from Bakersfield(Taft) to Mojave(Fleta). The tank train still runs from Mojave to Dolores. The pipeline just eliminated the run over the hill.

No, the Mojave to Dolores run was eliminated in 1999, three years after the Mojave terminal opened. The Bakersfield Californian had an article about it in May 1999. Their online archieves do not go back that far, however, you can probably buy a copy of the article from them. Paramount Petroleum is using the Mojave terminal as an asphalt terminal (http://www.ppcla.com/Paramount/l_mojave.html). If you cannot view the photopgraphs in the Paramount Petroleum link in Netscape, try Internet Explorer.

http://www.aspeneg.com/L2/L2_AIR_PacificPipeline.htm
http://www.pacificenergypartners.com/iPACHD2c.htm
http://www.pacificenergypartners.com/IPACHD2WCO.htm
http://www.pacificenergypartners.com/iPAC2H01.htm
http://www.pacificenergypartners.com/iPACH3b.htm
It looks like Anschutz was involved with it.

"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Wednesday, March 9, 2005 7:50 AM
A power company is building a coal fired power plant in Arkansas. A local farmer drives up to the construction superintendent and asks what they're buiding. The super tells him a coal fired power plant. The local tells him if he needs to haul coal he has a dump truck. The super tells him he doesn't understand they are going to use a LOT of coal. The local tells the super in that case, if the company will guarantee him the loads, he'll go buy a second dump truck.

True story.

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,006 posts
Posted by tree68 on Wednesday, March 9, 2005 8:59 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by greyhounds

QUOTE: Originally posted by greyhounds



Question how fast can the Oil move in a pipeline?


For what it's worth, being that I read it in the Chicago Tribune, fuel from Texas moves to Chicago via pipeline at 4 MPH.

But it just keeps comming out of that pipe, or so I hope.


I calculated the speed of water moving through a 5" fire hose at 1000 gallons per minute for a training exercise - it is travelling at about 11 mph. If I remember my area calculations correctly the cross section is a little less than 20 square inches. A 10" pipe would have over three times the cross section.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 9, 2005 9:33 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Conrail7659

Large pieces of dimension limestone, limestone used in building construction (pentagon, all kinds of memorials, etc.) I know use to basically use a all rail route until it got very near the final destination. This is basically due to the fact that it is cost prohibitive to ship very heavy pieces long distance by truck. All kinds of permitting and escorts are needed for very large and heavy loads.

Another example is the Boeing aircraft bodies and parts, which travel on the "Boeing Train" from Kansas to Washington State.



Washington County Railroad no longer moves stone for Rock of Ages Quarry. But with the war and the increased buisness from that who knows?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 9, 2005 9:37 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by ericsp

Hoboes.

Nah most of them became hitchikers. But the truth is with Greyhound and go any were for 69 dollers or less with unlimited stops many bo's just ca***here check and take the bus.
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Harrisburg PA / Dover AFB DE
  • 1,482 posts
Posted by adrianspeeder on Wednesday, March 9, 2005 9:50 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dehusman

A power company is building a coal fired power plant in Arkansas. A local farmer drives up to the construction superintendent and asks what they're buiding. The super tells him a coal fired power plant. The local tells him if he needs to haul coal he has a dump truck. The super tells him he doesn't understand they are going to use a LOT of coal. The local tells the super in that case, if the company will guarantee him the loads, he'll go buy a second dump truck.

True story.

Dave H.


Ahhh, the powerstroke diesel will handle it....

Adrianspeeder

USAF TSgt C-17 Aircraft Maintenance Flying Crew Chief & Flightline Avionics Craftsman

  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: State College PA
  • 344 posts
Posted by ajmiller on Wednesday, March 9, 2005 10:17 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by tree68

QUOTE: Originally posted by greyhounds

QUOTE: Originally posted by greyhounds



Question how fast can the Oil move in a pipeline?


For what it's worth, being that I read it in the Chicago Tribune, fuel from Texas moves to Chicago via pipeline at 4 MPH.

But it just keeps comming out of that pipe, or so I hope.


I calculated the speed of water moving through a 5" fire hose at 1000 gallons per minute for a training exercise - it is travelling at about 11 mph. If I remember my area calculations correctly the cross section is a little less than 20 square inches. A 10" pipe would have over three times the cross section.


1 us gallon = 0.133680556 cubic feet according to google.
1000 gallons per minute = 133.68 cubic feet per minute.
Assuming circular cross section: area = pi * r^2 where r is pipe radius, or
area = (pi * d^2)/4 where d is pipe diameter.
For 5 inch diameter hose, area = 19.63 square inches or 0.13635 square feet approximately.
Then the average velocity of the flow would be 133.68 cu. ft per min / 0.13635 sq. ft = 980.39 ft per min.
Converting to miles per hour: 980.39 ft per min * 60 min per hr / 5280 ft per mile = 11.14 mph.

If you double the diameter from d to 2d then area increases by a factor of 4 from the area formula: Area1 = pi * d^2 / 4; Area2 = pi * (2*d)^2 / 4 = pi * d^2 = 4 * Area1. Assuming a constant volume rate of 1000 gal per min, a 10 in diameter hose would give a flow velocity of 2.785 mph which is 11.14 mph / 4.
  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: US
  • 2,358 posts
Posted by csxengineer98 on Wednesday, March 9, 2005 3:21 PM
i forgot to ask...why do you want to know?
csx engineer
"I AM the higher source" Keep the wheels on steel
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Wednesday, March 9, 2005 3:33 PM
I do know of one paticular chemical that I have never seen move by truck, and I think evry state's DOT forbids to move by water...
Hydrocyanic Acid....
Liquid cyanide...under pressure, it is a liquid, at atmosphere, it is a gas...(yes,, the gas chamber stuff) it is used in making some plactics, and recovering precious metals...


I have only seen this stuff move via rail...
Ed

23 17 46 11

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy