Trains.com

Santa Fe at Temple TX

1066 views
6 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Near Promentory UT
  • 1,590 posts
Santa Fe at Temple TX
Posted by dldance on Thursday, February 24, 2005 8:48 PM
I drove throught Temple TX Sunday afternoon and stopped to see the BNSF engine service yard. You would have thought that it was still owned by the Santa Fe. Almost every engine in the yard area was in SF paint (with a discrete BNSF near the locmotive number). I much prefer BNSF's renumbering approach to that yellow and red bandaid that UP is using.

dd
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • 45 posts
Posted by brazos87 on Thursday, February 24, 2005 10:31 PM
I agree about the BNSF approach. While you were in Temple, did you get to see any of the cabooses which have (rather crudely) Shoving Platform Only stenciled on the sides?
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Near Promentory UT
  • 1,590 posts
Posted by dldance on Thursday, February 24, 2005 10:43 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by brazos87

I agree about the BNSF approach. While you were in Temple, did you get to see any of the cabooses which have (rather crudely) Shoving Platform Only stenciled on the sides?


No - the only other thing I saw was a gravel train - even it had SF engines.

dd
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Posted by spbed on Friday, February 25, 2005 6:30 AM
Yes when I 1st saw the UPRR bandaid on a SPRR loco I wonder to myself if the UPRR was short of $$$$$$ & could not afford the paint for a total repainting. [;)]





QUOTE: Originally posted by dldance

I drove throught Temple TX Sunday afternoon and stopped to see the BNSF engine service yard. You would have thought that it was still owned by the Santa Fe. Almost every engine in the yard area was in SF paint (with a discrete BNSF near the locmotive number). I much prefer BNSF's renumbering approach to that yellow and red bandaid that UP is using.

dd

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, February 25, 2005 8:57 AM
From the old railroads of BNSF, only the Santa Fe reached the Gulf in Texas, Frisco reached the Gulf in Mobile.... The old Fort Worth & Denver did exactly that, and the Frisco never ventured further south than DFW.... Therefore, the reason why there is so much former Santa Fe equipment in Temple.....
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Near Promentory UT
  • 1,590 posts
Posted by dldance on Friday, February 25, 2005 9:02 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by donclark

From the old railroads of BNSF, only the Santa Fe reached the Gulf in Texas, Frisco reached the Gulf in Mobile.... The old Fort Worth & Denver did exactly that, and the Frisco never ventured further south than DFW.... Therefore, the reason why there is so much former Santa Fe equipment in Temple.....


However, most of the time I stop there BNSF has a much broader variety of paint. One time most of what was in the shop area was from TFM!

dd
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, March 3, 2005 9:49 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by donclark

From the old railroads of BNSF, only the Santa Fe reached the Gulf in Texas, Frisco reached the Gulf in Mobile.... The old Fort Worth & Denver did exactly that, and the Frisco never ventured further south than DFW.... Therefore, the reason why there is so much former Santa Fe equipment in Temple.....


The Frisco was built and went all the way to Menard, below San Angelo, in the early 1900s, when it was under ATSF control, and then the line was sold to GCSF.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy