-ChrisWest Chicago, ILChristopher May Fine Art Photography"In wisdom gathered over time I have found that every experience is a form of exploration." ~Ansel Adams
QUOTE: Originally posted by CopCarSS Hmmmm...sounds a little like the rhetoric that kept rural lines barely used open by the regulation that killed off the pre-Conrail roads. I'd hate to see Amtrak go, because I ride it quite a bit. At the same time I'd really like to see some changes made to it if it sticks around. I really do think that if Amtrak died, there would be public and private interests that would resurrect passenger service. It wouldn't look anything like Amtrak does, and I think that's the point that the Bush administration is trying to make. High speed rail, touristy routes, and rail "cruise" lines could be very profitable I think. Perhaps even a national passenger system that would learn how to run on time could compete. Just my [2c] though. Chris May Denver, CO
Mechanical Department "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."
The Missabe Road: Safety First
QUOTE: Amtrak's on time performance seldom is their fault. It is the freight railroads fault added to by a well entioned FRA rule about NEVER exceeding the speed limit. So there is never any chance of making up any time at all.
QUOTE: The Oregonians comments were more centered around the Pacific Northwest than nationally, but your comments about the regulatory mindset is well taken. If the freight railroads were being required to operate and subsidize the trains, you would have a very valid point. But what is being promoted here is a service that has been deemed "necessary" by the "public authorities" and therefore any shortfall at the fare box should be covered by "the government".
QUOTE: have no problem with the several states contributing to specific trains operations. Oregon and Washington cover all of the Cascades fare box shortfall to the tune of $13 million per year. California does the same for the Surfliners and the Central Cal trains to/from the Bay Area. We see much the same effort around Chicago and other places. Montana and North Dakota could also, perhaps, contribute since the Empire Builder service is so vital to their areas. If the affected states would pony up the trains shortfalls, I don't think we would be seeing the "Mineta Plan" attempted to be forced on Amtrak because from Amtraks view, the trains would be breaking even - no subsidy needed.
QUOTE: I once read a Dave Riddell article that said if when he was an Amtrak engineer, they would not be able to make up even a minute because of strict speeding regulations. And i'm beting none of the numerous grade crossing accidnets were Amtraks fault. But they do need to get some high speed service, like Japan and France.
QUOTE: Originally posted by kenneo If a profit could be made operating passenger rail, Amtrak would be making it, and the freight railroads would be beating up on the Feds to get passenger rail back
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.