Trains.com

100 ton PCF RPL

1486 views
9 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 5,134 posts
Posted by ericsp on Wednesday, July 13, 2005 11:41 PM
I have not seen either one of these since 02/17/05. Has anyone seen these or other ARMN 750000 series cars?

"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Tuesday, February 22, 2005 9:26 AM
Just got the word back this morning--ARMN 757402 and 757493 are in fact formerly SPFE 457402 and 457493, respectively.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 5,134 posts
Posted by ericsp on Saturday, February 19, 2005 6:15 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by wncrails

I have a pic of ARMN 766147. Is it also one of the upgraded cars?

That is a 70 ton reefer. It is a rebuilt R-70-16. It has had some work done on it (I do not know the extent). Some some of the ARMN 766000 series cars are incorrectly stenciled R-70-20 though.

"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Saturday, February 19, 2005 8:20 AM
Eric, I may have steered you wrong about those 100-ton cars. I don't think any SPFE cars were relettered UPFE and not renumbered.

The cars I looked at yesterday in the 760000 series were all 70-ton cars; I'm now wondering whether your 750000s are sequentially renumbered from the 460000s-- i.e. ARMN 757402 might be ex-UPFE 467402. I will try and dig the prior identities out, though it may take a while.

Meantime, I found two things a little troublesome about the R-100-2 stenciling on the car: Looking at ARMN 757402, I find that the load limit and light weight still add up to 220000 pounds--that's the gross rail load of a 70-ton car. Also, class R-100-2 is already assigned to some FGE-built "Chilled Express" reefers in the ARMN 931000, 932000, and 933000 series. I wonder if that classification was stencilled in error.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, February 19, 2005 6:59 AM
I have a pic of ARMN 766147. Is it also one of the upgraded cars?
  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 5,134 posts
Posted by ericsp on Saturday, February 19, 2005 12:29 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by CShaveRR

Given UP's practice for renumbering those cars, they're formerly UPFE 457000-series cars with the same last three digits. Upgrading them to 100-ton capacity is merely a matter of changing the trucks, and possibly someother components.

That means that they are ex-SPFE cars, according to Pacific Fruit Express, 2nd Edition. Thinks for all your help with my questions about reefers.

"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Friday, February 18, 2005 11:13 AM
Given UP's practice for renumbering those cars, they're formerly UPFE 457000-series cars with the same last three digits. Upgrading them to 100-ton capacity is merely a matter of changing the trucks, and possibly someother components.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 5,134 posts
Posted by ericsp on Thursday, February 17, 2005 11:38 PM
The only two I have been able to find anything on so far are the ARMN 757402 and ARMN 757493. Maybe they are uprgrading some 70 ton RPLs to 100 ton RPLs.

"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Thursday, February 17, 2005 6:36 PM
The load restraints are there to keep the prisoners inside from escaping!
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 5,134 posts
100 ton PCF RPL
Posted by ericsp on Thursday, February 17, 2005 6:33 PM
Today I saw a first. It was a 100 ton Pacific Car and Foundry (PCF) Mechanical Reefer with load restraints or dividers (RPL). I have never seen nor heard of such a thing, until today. It is ARMN 757493, class R-100-2 and looked like a class R-70-20. Does anyone know anything about it? Was it a 70 ton RPL rebuilt with 100 ton capacity or did it start out as a 100 ton RPL?

"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy