croteaudd Hey, Fred M. Cain: Are you OK? Haven’t heard anything from you …
Hey, Fred M. Cain:
Are you OK? Haven’t heard anything from you …
I started typing up a response yesterday while at work and got distracted and the message failed to post so I just let it go.
It's fun to think about a new railroad in the Tonopah area but at this point we're all just speculating so I guess I'll wait until we can get more detailed information on the planned mines.
I wonder how much water is required for processing and if it is available in the vicinity.
The closest active railhead to Tonopah is at Hawthorne (ex-SP). The line ran beyond to Mina until about the 1980s. From there ran the Tonopah & Goldfield until 1947.
I understand they need a lot of chemicals to process the Li ore, so they may need a RR more for inbound traffic.
Fred M. Cain:
Looking at a map the impression one gets about Tonopah, Nev. is it is in a no man’s land. The surrounding areas were examined on a map. Beatty is close to 100 miles to the south, slightly east. Not too far east from Beatty, in the TRAINS Newswire some years ago was news about a rail effort to haul nuclear waste to Yucca Mountain by a new rail line that would connect to the Union Pacific at I believe Caliente, Nev.
Going west from Beatty one enters California and after many miles comes to Lone Pine, a town that rail photographer Richard Steinheimer took a number of photos in, that appeared in TRAINS. Lone Pine is also the town the famed photographer Ansel Adams in the early 1940’s shot one of his super well-known photos in. I’ve been to both photo sites! The last visit was a disaster. Plotting to take a photo that combined Steinheimer’s and Adams’ efforts, that last mile was barricaded off! What a disappointment!
Anyway, your thread brought related ex- or possibly future rail areas to mind.
Croteaudd,
Well, yes, like I'd mentioned, it just all depends if the lithium is milled and refined right at the mine or not. If so, then, yes, you could get all the lithium you'd need in a semi or maybe even in a straight truck. (It's dangerous, so I doubt FedEx or UPS would accept it).
BUT ~ ! If the ore has to be shipped remotely, that raises a whole 'nother wrinkle. My guess is that several 120 ton ore car loads would be needed to just produce a relatively small amount of pure lithium. That's my best guess but I have to admit I don't know for sure.
I'm thinking about contacting the mining company but I suspect I won't get very far with them.
In the bitter end, my speculation may be hugely premature because the mine at Tonopah may never even open at all in the first place. The environmentalists are already sharpening their knives.
I used to be an adament environmentalist myself but my views have changed somewhat. We can't just stop all mining, drilling and logging. The human population requires raw materials to support itself. People impose pressure on the natural environment which is a most unfortunate fact but that's just the way it is.
There's an old axiom, "if didn't come from a farm or a forest, then it had to have come from a mine". Petroleum extraction is, its own way, also a form of mining.
A similar situation was recently discussed elsewhere here on the forum. It had to do with copper.
The feeling was that the volume just wasn't there to warrant rail transport, and particularly the investment necessary to make rail transport possible.
Larry Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date Come ride the rails with me! There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...
Hi, Fred!
For the sake of argument, you could put a lot of cell phone and camera lithium batteries in a coal car! There may be a huge market for lithium, but I don’t think railroads could economically tap into it. Batteries could be made on site and have FedEx or UPS “Ground” deliver to corporate distributors or big purchasers. A fifty to a hundred lithium ‘coal cars’ seems extremely unlikely. Fifty to hundred coal cars of coal are the norm. And remember, Fred, the railroads are interested in volume. It just doesn’t strike me as something railroads would pursue.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.