Trains.com

Amtrak #4 derails, lands all cars on side after hitting dump truck at Mendon KS today (/)

12678 views
240 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2010
  • 2,515 posts
Amtrak #4 derails, lands all cars on side after hitting dump truck at Mendon KS today (/)
Posted by Electroliner 1935 on Monday, June 27, 2022 3:24 PM

 

I'm posting this here but only to move this to PASSENGER forum.

https://www.kmbc.com/article/passenger-train-derails-missouri-monday-afternoon/40435950

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Monday, June 27, 2022 3:30 PM

Dump truck driver is in some serious trouble. (every public crossing within 5 miles of town is gated.)

Stalled on crossing or drove around gates?

 

Probably FELT STREET / MP 360.56   005-278V Marcelline Sub

Waiting on the details.

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    January 2019
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 9,728 posts
Posted by Flintlock76 on Monday, June 27, 2022 3:49 PM

mudchicken

Dump truck driver is in some serious trouble. (every public crossing within 5 miles of town is gated.)

Stalled on crossing or drove around gates?

 

Yes, he's in DEEP trouble assuming he's not dead.  From the live feed it looks like the truck came completely apart.  

Shocking to say the least.  I don't think there's ever been an Amtrak train put totally on the ground like that.   

Stalled on the crossing or going around the gates?  We'll have to wait to find out.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, June 27, 2022 4:19 PM

mudchicken
Dump truck driver is in some serious trouble. (every public crossing within 5 miles of town is gated.)

Stalled on crossing or drove around gates? 

Probably FELT STREET / MP 360.56   005-278V Marcelline Sub

Waiting on the details.

Is this the former ATSF 90 MPH territory?

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,023 posts
Posted by tree68 on Monday, June 27, 2022 4:30 PM

Mendon, MO, not KS.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 2,505 posts
Posted by caldreamer on Monday, June 27, 2022 4:59 PM

Just looked on Google Maps.  The tracks cross Felt Street and there are two main tracks with a third that ends just beyond Felt St.  There are signals and gates on both sides of the crossing.

  • Member since
    September 2020
  • 12 posts
Posted by xrds72 on Monday, June 27, 2022 5:20 PM

Location is at CR 113 just west of Mendon. Crossbucks only

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,139 posts
Posted by Gramp on Monday, June 27, 2022 5:33 PM

xrds72

Location is at CR 113 just west of Mendon. Crossbucks only

 

Yes, gravel road with crossbucks.  State Patrol reported. 
An Appleton, Wi Boy Scout troop group and adult leaders were on the train. Four children were injured, but not seriously. Others (ironically) were helping other passengers. 

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, June 27, 2022 5:42 PM

Gramp
 
xrds72

Location is at CR 113 just west of Mendon. Crossbucks only 

Yes, gravel road with crossbucks. County sheriff reported. 
An Appleton, Wi Boy Scout troop group and adult leaders were on the train. Four children were injured, but not seriously. Others (ironically) were helping other passengers. 

National News is reporting 3 dead including the truck driver.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,754 posts
Posted by diningcar on Monday, June 27, 2022 5:51 PM

Believe this is about two miles west of the town on a gravel road with no electronic crossing warning devices; just a crossbuck

  • Member since
    September 2017
  • 5,636 posts
Posted by charlie hebdo on Monday, June 27, 2022 6:16 PM

Private crossing with cross bucks only?   Any trackage with passenger trains at least needs proper gated crossings.These private crossings should be eliminated or cease running service.

  • Member since
    December 2017
  • From: I've been everywhere, man
  • 4,269 posts
Posted by SD70Dude on Monday, June 27, 2022 6:29 PM

xrds72

Location is at CR 113 just west of Mendon. Crossbucks only

Location:

https://www.google.com/maps/place/39%C2%B033'38.1%22N+93%C2%B010'52.2%22W/@39.5605975,-93.1829962,461m/data=!3m2!1e3!4b1!4m6!3m5!1s0x0:0xf2df087ca440031c!7e2!8m2!3d39.5605941!4d-93.1811532

Looks like a public road with excellent sightlines (no brush, trees or buildings).   

In Canada the standards for new crossings require warning devices on double track, and when double track is built any existing crossings must be upgraded to current standards.  There are still a lot of older crossings that are grandfathered in, both public and private.

Greetings from Alberta

-an Articulate Malcontent

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Monday, June 27, 2022 6:40 PM

That was the old 90 mph (ATS) territory. If the crossing is as claimed, CR-113 (Porche Prairie Road)is in the middle of a 14 mile long tangent with light curves at each end. (The train [#4]would not have gotten to Mendon yet. 005-284Y Has not had any type of reportable accident/ collision in over 50 years according to FRA. Crossing is at about a 45 degree angle, table top flat (0%) grade and is just east (1.5 Mi) of the old Wabash line to Omaha used to cross near Whitham (ATSF over WAB)....As DC correctly pointed out, wide-open site-lines (farm fields and almost no trees).

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Monday, June 27, 2022 7:04 PM

charlie hebdo

Private crossing with cross bucks only?   Any trackage with passenger trains at least needs proper gated crossings.These private crossings should be eliminated or cease running service.

 

PUBLIC crossing. (The AADT is really small, but trying to close these or get the rail side of MoDOT to throw Section 400 Money at it is a non-starter. Good argument for bringing back the old RR Commission and demanding that the agency have at least one person with a railroad qualified pedigree...NOT gonna happen in MO.)

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Monday, June 27, 2022 7:15 PM

Clear sightlines are sometimes the worst.. no reference points makes it very easy to misjudge speed and distance. 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,023 posts
Posted by tree68 on Monday, June 27, 2022 8:10 PM

xrds72

Location is at CR 113 just west of Mendon. Crossbucks only.

The road and tracks cross at about a 45 degree angle.  I haven't seen which way the truck was travelling, but if it was northbound, the train would have been seen over over the driver's left shoulder.  Depending on a lot of variables, the driver may not have seen the train.

The train was running late, so the driver may not have expected it (I know, always expect...)

Just another factor to throw into the mix.

If the truck was southbound, the driver should have had a clear view of the oncoming train.  

EDIT:  The crossing database for crossing 005284Y shows 58 trains a day, plus two Amtrak.  Average road traffic (1989) was five, 10% trucks.  From the FRA crossing databse.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Monday, June 27, 2022 8:18 PM

Flintlock76

mudchicken

Dump truck driver is in some serious trouble. (every public crossing within 5 miles of town is gated.)

Stalled on crossing or drove around gates?

 

Yes, he's in DEEP trouble assuming he's not dead.  From the live feed it looks like the truck came completely apart.  

Shocking to say the least.  I don't think there's ever been an Amtrak train put totally on the ground like that.   

Stalled on the crossing or going around the gates?  We'll have to wait to find out.

 

  Recall: about i.5 to 3 years back(?) the SW CHIEF[#3] went on the ground near Dodge City Ks.: when a local feed lot's truck backed up on the track,and I think, 'rolled a rail over'(?)  and put her on the ground.  Not as bad as this current crash, but still pretty ugly....

 

 


 

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,139 posts
Posted by Gramp on Monday, June 27, 2022 8:28 PM

The 16 Boy Scouts from Appleton were coming back from an adventure week at that Boy Scout camp in New Mexico that Santa Fe/Amtrak have ferried kids to forever in the summertime.  Two of the adult leaders were taken to the hospital.  Hoping broken ribs were the worst of the injuries.  The kids lended first aid to other passengers and the dump truck driver.  Reported driver as deceased, so don't know if only one person was in the truck.  The group were scheduled to take the Hiawatha from Chicago up to Milwaukee once they got to Chicago.

I've complained here with pushback about the need to invest in grade crossing elimination on trunk lines, particularly where commuter/Amtrak train service is prevalent.  It was accomplished on the NEC.  A bigger chunk of state highway dollars should be directed to that in my book.  

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,023 posts
Posted by tree68 on Monday, June 27, 2022 8:54 PM

Gramp
I've complained here with pushback about the need to invest in grade crossing elimination on trunk lines, particularly where commuter/Amtrak train service is prevalent.  It was accomplished on the NEC.  A bigger chunk of state highway dollars should be directed to that in my book.  

I don't disagree.

But, as MC points out, that crossing has zero accident history.  With the  limited traffic (in another post), grade separation is an unlikely possibility, and the 4 or so mile detour closing the crossing would require, it might not be a popular decision locally.

I'm sure the highway folks have bigger fish to fry, this incident notwithstanding.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, June 27, 2022 9:27 PM

Gramp
...

I've complained here with pushback about the need to invest in grade crossing elimination on trunk lines, particularly where commuter/Amtrak train service is prevalent.  It was accomplished on the NEC.  A bigger chunk of state highway dollars should be directed to that in my book.  

Your complaints pale in comparison to the efforts the carriers expend in crossing elimination - and the push back they get from any and every local organization and governmental body in the area.

Before I retired, I know local operating division officers were given a quota number of crossings to be closed on the division and how closely they attained or exceeded that number was one aspect of their 'performance review' that set their compensation.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,139 posts
Posted by Gramp on Monday, June 27, 2022 10:15 PM

It was the scout leader's son who tried to aid the truck driver, and he was with him when he died.  And some of the other scouts' medical aid training that automatically kicked in in their being able to assist others on the train.

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,139 posts
Posted by Gramp on Monday, June 27, 2022 10:18 PM

BaltACD

 

 
Gramp
...

I've complained here with pushback about the need to invest in grade crossing elimination on trunk lines, particularly where commuter/Amtrak train service is prevalent.  It was accomplished on the NEC.  A bigger chunk of state highway dollars should be directed to that in my book.  

 

Your complaints pale in comparison to the efforts the carriers expend in crossing elimination - and the push back they get from any and every local organization and governmental body in the area.

Before I retired, I know local operating division officers were given a quota number of crossings to be closed on the division and how closely they attained or exceeded that number was one aspect of their 'performance review' that set their compensation.

 

I'm not knocking the railroads for crossings not being taken out.  I was speaking to choices governmental bodies involved with roads make.

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,139 posts
Posted by Gramp on Monday, June 27, 2022 10:44 PM

tree68

 

 
Gramp
I've complained here with pushback about the need to invest in grade crossing elimination on trunk lines, particularly where commuter/Amtrak train service is prevalent.  It was accomplished on the NEC.  A bigger chunk of state highway dollars should be directed to that in my book.  

 

I don't disagree.

But, as MC points out, that crossing has zero accident history.  With the  limited traffic (in another post), grade separation is an unlikely possibility, and the 4 or so mile detour closing the crossing would require, it might not be a popular decision locally.

I'm sure the highway folks have bigger fish to fry, this incident notwithstanding.

 

tree68

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 

I understand the perspective.  What I disagree with is the foundational thinking often in play.  Remember the battle over putting seatbelts in cars.  The probability of you being in an accident at an intersection... any intersection... no matter how busy... through time... is such that it's folly not to wear a seatbelt.  The "cost" is worth it.

We know an active railroad right-of-way is by its nature mighty dangerous.

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • 104 posts
Posted by railfanjohn on Monday, June 27, 2022 10:45 PM

From the Amtrak Website:

Service Update:

As a result of the derailment, passengers who were traveling onboard Train 4, which departed L.A. on Sunday, June 26, will be reaccommodated as quickly as possible on other trains or buses as available. Additionally, Southwest Chief Train 3, scheduled to depart Chicago on Tuesday, June 28, will now originate at Kansas City (KCY).

Couldn"t they detour the Southwest Chief;  Kansas City to St. Louis?  Then St. Louis to Chicago?  Amtrak already runs over these two routes.  I know it would be a longer trip but I would think it is possible.  Only the stops between Galesburg, Il. and Kansas City would be missed.  How many stops does the Southwest Chief make between these two cities?

railfanjohn
  • Member since
    December 2017
  • From: I've been everywhere, man
  • 4,269 posts
Posted by SD70Dude on Monday, June 27, 2022 11:06 PM

railfanjohn

From the Amtrak Website:

Service Update:

As a result of the derailment, passengers who were traveling onboard Train 4, which departed L.A. on Sunday, June 26, will be reaccommodated as quickly as possible on other trains or buses as available. Additionally, Southwest Chief Train 3, scheduled to depart Chicago on Tuesday, June 28, will now originate at Kansas City (KCY).

Couldn"t they detour the Southwest Chief;  Kansas City to St. Louis?  Then St. Louis to Chicago?  Amtrak already runs over these two routes.  I know it would be a longer trip but I would think it is possible.  Only the stops between Galesburg, Il. and Kansas City would be missed.  How many stops does the Southwest Chief make between these two cities?

 

Perhaps the next No. 4 will be turned at Kansas City tomorrow and assume No. 3's schedule from there.  

Greetings from Alberta

-an Articulate Malcontent

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Tuesday, June 28, 2022 2:34 AM

railfanjohn

Couldn"t they detour the Southwest Chief;  Kansas City to St. Louis?  Then St. Louis to Chicago?  Amtrak already runs over these two routes.  I know it would be a longer trip but I would think it is possible.  Only the stops between Galesburg, Il. and Kansas City would be missed.  How many stops does the Southwest Chief make between these two cities?

 

 
I believe that the ule now conects or close to conects to Chief at KC.  Why not attach Chief equipment to those train sets? Already have qualified crews.  Axel counts be dammed.
  • Member since
    May 2019
  • 1,314 posts
Posted by BEAUSABRE on Tuesday, June 28, 2022 4:41 AM

From the news

"MODOT's 2022 State Freight and Rail plan released in February listed the intersection at County Road 113 and Porche Prairie Road for installation of lights, and gates, and roadway improvements at the public crossing.

The plan estimated the cost for improvements at $400,000. It lists projects for their ability to improve the "efficiency, intermodal and safety of freight shipments in Missouri."

Another draft document for anticipated project schedules listed the improvements to the intersection in MODOT's 2022 state fiscal year project budget. However, it is unclear when or if that work was scheduled to begin. A spokeswoman for MoDOT in Chariton County said Monday evening that MODOT's state office is working to provide answers to questions about the schedule of safety improvements at the intersection."

  • Member since
    May 2019
  • 1,314 posts
Posted by BEAUSABRE on Tuesday, June 28, 2022 4:42 AM

Flintlock76
Yes, he's in DEEP trouble assuming he's not dead

He's gone

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, June 28, 2022 6:23 AM

SD70Dude
 
railfanjohn

From the Amtrak Website:

Service Update:

As a result of the derailment, passengers who were traveling onboard Train 4, which departed L.A. on Sunday, June 26, will be reaccommodated as quickly as possible on other trains or buses as available. Additionally, Southwest Chief Train 3, scheduled to depart Chicago on Tuesday, June 28, will now originate at Kansas City (KCY).

Couldn"t they detour the Southwest Chief;  Kansas City to St. Louis?  Then St. Louis to Chicago?  Amtrak already runs over these two routes.  I know it would be a longer trip but I would think it is possible.  Only the stops between Galesburg, Il. and Kansas City would be missed.  How many stops does the Southwest Chief make between these two cities? 

Perhaps the next No. 4 will be turned at Kansas City tomorrow and assume No. 3's schedule from there.  

Remember - this incident has taken one complete trainset in the operation of #3 & #4 out of service.  Amtrak has been having issues keeping enough equipment operational to run their normal schedules.  Losing one complete trainset does not help the situation.  Inserting a route that takes longer to negotiate than the normal route doesn't help the equipment situation either.

 

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    April 2002
  • From: Delmarva Peninsula
  • 116 posts
Posted by SealBook27 on Tuesday, June 28, 2022 8:43 AM

For over 30 years I have driven medium and heavy duty trucks.  The view out the right side is more restricted than you think, what with a 2 square foot blindspot due to the west coast and spot mirrors.  The dirt road does not cross the tracks at 90 degrees.  If the shallow angle (less than 90 degrees) is on the right side, the driver has got to angle more to the right in order to get any decent view down the tracks.  That means moving to the left first in order to have enough room on this narrow road to swing to the right.  And you better keep the inside wheel of the dual wheels on the "pavement", or you risk getting stuck.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy